It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: alienjuggalo
I don't condone it. I think they are wrong. The "right ones" are fleeing to avoid having to join up. We call them refugees. So many want to punish these refugees by denying them sanctuary. That's wrong too.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: alienjuggalo
I don't condone it. I think they are wrong. The "right ones" are fleeing to avoid having to join up. We call them refugees. So many want to punish these refugees by denying them sanctuary. That's wrong too.
Yea, that's a good point actually. I'm sure the west's sour opinion of the refugees isn't exactly inspiring a lot of confidence to flee and be a refugee in lieu of being conscripted into ISIS.
originally posted by: redhorse
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: alienjuggalo
I don't condone it. I think they are wrong. The "right ones" are fleeing to avoid having to join up. We call them refugees. So many want to punish these refugees by denying them sanctuary. That's wrong too.
Yea, that's a good point actually. I'm sure the west's sour opinion of the refugees isn't exactly inspiring a lot of confidence to flee and be a refugee in lieu of being conscripted into ISIS.
Maybe, but I would think that the "right" ones would care about their families enough to bring them too. Historically, this is not how a refugee population fleeing from war looks. They pull up, root and branch, the whole family as much as they can. What we are seeing is weird. I am skeptical.
Having said that, if economic and physical security are being used as leverage to such competent effect by ISIS then offering these refugees a chance to achieve that somewhere else could entice more people away from the group. If they feel that they have an option besides ISIS it could destroy the groups leverage of desperation.
The United States had previously refrained from striking the fleet of trucks, believed to number over 1,000, out of concern over civilian casualties, according to the New York Times. This meant that, up until Monday, the IS oil logistics system remained largely intact, but reconnaissance drones had been surveying the area where the trucks assemble for some time.
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Stop making excuses for ISIL.
If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” ― Sun Tzu
Last year, 51% of refugees were under 18 years old. This is the highest figure for child refugees in more than a decade.
Male (49.7%)
0 - 4 8.9%
5 - 11 10.8%
12 - 17 6.6%
18 - 59 22.1%
60 + 1.3%
Age (50.3%) Female
0 - 4 8.4%
5 - 11 10.3%
12 - 17 6.2%
18 - 59 23.7%
60 + 1.7%
What I'm implying is that we do not see that many women, children and elderly among the refugee population.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
What are we "seeing" exactly? And what are you implying?
originally posted by: avriel
I'm getting a major operation on socialist health care, in the USA I would be looking at an estimated expiry date on my life.