posted on Nov, 19 2015 @ 04:15 PM
How is this 'terrorism' any different to Guy Fawkes sponsored by the Catholic Church, the French Resistance murdering those who wouldn't join them
backed by the British and their Defender of the Faith and the murder of over 200,000 civilians in a predominantly agricultural area in just two blasts
by the US, self-proclaimed blessed by God? All relied on fear to get their way in the name of a freedom allegedly defined in the Christian tradition
which purportedly preaches peace among men through tolerance and inaction. Islam and its 'terrorists' are no different. Each century's generations
follow the precedents set in the previous century. The West set all the precedents in the 19th and 20th centuries. 21st century cultures see these,
see they were successful and imitate them. They also see what happened to those who surrendered or were subjugated. Germany, Japan, Israel all seem
to have done pretty well, invested in by the victors. Where's the lesson for them to learn?
The biggest stumbling block to world peace is the USA. It was the one that went crazy with its nuclear arsenal, was mad to build the biggest army per
capita and over-funded itself on lunatic foundations of land theft, slavery and organised gambling on a mass scale. It holds the biggest repository
of lethal viruses. Mental. With all that behind it, it strike more fear in the rest of world than the Middle East groups. The majority of its
population supports the use of violence and indeed the right for the individual, sane or otherwise, to kill or maim is enshrined in its constitution
and protected despite numerous killing sprees. Is that rational?
And that's just what we know about.
Maybe if the US could be cured, the 'terrorists' might follow suit and seek a doctor.