It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The laws revolving around illegal entry or overstaying are found in Section 1325 in Title 8 of the United States Code. This section, titled “Improper Entry of Alien” will provide a fine or imprisonment (or both) for any immigrant who: 1. Enters or attempts to enter America at any time or location other than what was designated by the United States Government (immigration official, or 2. Any individual who eludes inspection or examination instituted by the United States Government and its immigration agents, or 3. Any individual who attempts to enter the United States by providing a false or misleading representation of oneself or through a willful concealment of fact. For instance, if you provide a false passport, driver’s license or pretend to be anyone else, you will be charged with attempting to enter the United States in an illegal fashion. The maximum prison sentence for an individual caught in the act of violating immigration policy is 6 months for the first offense and additional 2 years for any subsequent offense.
So, what about the law? Is there a double standard when it comes to immigration?
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
At the same time, I have empathy for those that are legitimately trying to get out of harm’s way. For them, I would advocate finding ways to make their life better in the region.
originally posted by: darkbake
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
At the same time, I have empathy for those that are legitimately trying to get out of harm’s way. For them, I would advocate finding ways to make their life better in the region.
You don't have empathy for the refugees if you want them to try and make their life better in the region. The region is way too dangerous and in ruins, which is why they are leaving.
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
We also now know that ISIS is sending jihadists.
originally posted by: links234
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
We also now know that ISIS is sending jihadists.
No we don't.
originally posted by: links234
There's some reason to believe that preventing foreign nations from accepting refugees is exactly what ISIS wants. It allows them to force people to fight for them AND it creates a sense of fear and distrust that would make Muslims already in the West want to go fight for God.
originally posted by: darkbake
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
At the same time, I have empathy for those that are legitimately trying to get out of harm’s way. For them, I would advocate finding ways to make their life better in the region.
You don't have empathy for the refugees if you want them to try and make their life better in the region. The region is way too dangerous and in ruins, which is why they are leaving.
But there are several reasons why it’s worth waiting until all the facts are known before making too strong a link between the attacks and the refugee crisis. The first is a general one: on at least 12 occasions, Isis has actually criticised refugees for fleeing to Europe. “For those who want to blame the attacks on Paris on refugees, you might want to get your facts straight,” wrote Aaron Zelin, an analyst of jihad, in an online commentary about the 12 outbursts. “The reality is, [Isis] loathes that individuals are fleeing Syria for Europe. It undermines [Isis’s] message that its self-styled caliphate is a refuge.” It’s therefore unlikely that the vast majority of Syrians fleeing to Europe are Isis supporters, since their actions are in obvious contravention of the group’s creed.