It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: stolencar18
a reply to: Bedlam
Apparently you forget reasonable suspicion is. Not saying that was the case, but there are conditions where LEO can enter without a warrant.
I don't know why everyone on here thinks a warrant is mandatory 100% of the time.
This entire thing reeks of cop haters making crap up. The entire story. You guys should all be ashamed. You have less than half the story and zero proof at all and you're ready to hang the guy.
Can he lawfully enter without a warrant? Yes.
Is his statement being considered by you? No.
Has any evidence, such as dash cams, body cams, local video, etc been provided? No, but it may not exist.
Any forensics analysed and factored in yet? No.
Your ENTIRE story is "This other guy said that the cop busted the door down and shot him, so it must be true".
If ATS confirmed conspiracies around 9/11, Area 51, Bigfoot, and aliens the same way ATS crucifies cops this site would be out of material.
originally posted by: THEatsking
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: infolurker
I'm guessing there won't be any rioting in North Carolina? Why not? This isn't a vague racist remark. This is a serious question. WHY NOT?!
Why are white communities so docile when it comes to allowing themselves to be abused? I always hear of how black communities are "bad" because they react to injustices but that's how it should be. When police do this, it needs to cost the city money. Every time. Eventually, the folks in charge will realize that it's far more cost-effective to promote better training and stricter punishment for cops than to defend them in court all the time.
Wow, I think we have a racist.
White folks don't riot, we vote, we contact our representatives in congress, we write letters to the local paper. There may be more than a few that will do more, but most of us are working and trying to make a living and pay the bills.
originally posted by: Komodo
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
Not defending these officers actions. LEO's experience stress that most of us don't experience in our lives, was an automotive machinist, that set of chevy 350 heads in no way threatened my life. Walk a mile in another's moccasins and all of that, but mental health exams need to be performed.
well....
this isn't about feelings of stress ....which officers ARE or should be trained for ..
it's about the Civil Rights, period and upholding those Rights as the highest Law in the land...and making those crimes against our God given rights so harsh, this action would NEVER come up in a court of law...why? Because if we are slack and turn a blind eye...that door could be yours, mine and our children and Grand-children, NO ONE would be safe and the Republic becomes nothing and Democracy becomes Dictatorial....and then they will finally shout.."Welcome to the New World Order!"
70 years ago, Brown shirts turned Grey, then turned pitch Black...we must never forget.
originally posted by: stolencar18
a reply to: Bedlam
Apparently you forget reasonable suspicion is. Not saying that was the case, but there are conditions where LEO can enter without a warrant.
I don't know why everyone on here thinks a warrant is mandatory 100% of the time.
This entire thing reeks of cop haters making crap up. The entire story. You guys should all be ashamed. You have less than half the story and zero proof at all and you're ready to hang the guy.
Can he lawfully enter without a warrant? Yes.
Your ENTIRE story is "This other guy said that the cop busted the door down and shot him, so it must be true".
originally posted by: stevieray
lol, yes, like slamming a door in the cops' face, as though there's something that needs to be hidden from them.
That just MAY cause a cop to come on in. Amazing how simple logic and obvious likelihoods are avoided like the plague, in the greater effort to make the cops 100% guilty of everything. Never the fault of the guy with a rap sheet a mile long, lol.
originally posted by: stolencar18
Warrantless searches can be performed if the officer fears for their safety or the publics. Not necessarily life or death.
originally posted by: stevieray
Somebody slams the door on the cops and they just quietly walk away.....they own whatever that person's doing behind that door. Could be nothing or could be Dahmer getting ready to eat somebody, or the guys in Cleveland with the girls hidden away for 10 years.
originally posted by: J.B. Aloha
a reply to: Bedlam
Yepper doo.
These officers employed what is called here in NC the "knock and talk" initially to ascertain if the person in question was at the residence. Then proceeded to try to get consent for a search voluntarily from the resident. This procedure is outlined in North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 15 Article 9. When consent was not given, that should have been the end of it.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: stevieray
We get it. You love cops, so much you will defend them when they murder people. That is clear.
What isn't clear is why, but I am not so interested as to ask. I just chalk it up there are all types in the world.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: stevieray
lol, yes, like slamming a door in the cops' face, as though there's something that needs to be hidden from them.
That just MAY cause a cop to come on in. Amazing how simple logic and obvious likelihoods are avoided like the plague, in the greater effort to make the cops 100% guilty of everything. Never the fault of the guy with a rap sheet a mile long, lol.
Refusing entry to an officer who does not have a warrant has case law behind it. And that law states that police cannot use refusal to search as reasonable suspicion.
Again, if that were true, why bother with the fourth amendment at all? Because every encounter would be -
cop: I have no proof, and no warrant, yet I would like to search your home
homeowner: no. Get a warrant.
cop: rar! Your refusal makes me suspicious, so now I invoke reasonable suspicion!
The courts long ago stomped that one. So go try again.
originally posted by: stolencar18
You're speculating. For all you know the cop saw a bazooka on the coffee table over the guys shoulder. Reasonable suspicion exists in many forms.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: J.B. Aloha
a reply to: Bedlam
Yepper doo.
These officers employed what is called here in NC the "knock and talk" initially to ascertain if the person in question was at the residence. Then proceeded to try to get consent for a search voluntarily from the resident. This procedure is outlined in North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 15 Article 9. When consent was not given, that should have been the end of it.
Given the dribble of info that's been presented, so far, my GUESS, and it's totally my guess at this point, is that one of the officers, faced with the shock of being told to shove off until they had a warrant, stuck a hand or foot in the door as it was closing. ("one of the deputies received minor injuries")
But I'm guessing the 'minor injury' was caused when they tried to wedge the door open with something and got slammed in it. Then, of course, they went ape# due to frustration, anger and a bruised toe that they caused themselves.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: stolencar18
You're speculating. For all you know the cop saw a bazooka on the coffee table over the guys shoulder. Reasonable suspicion exists in many forms.
Right. That's why they have brought that up...oh wait, they have stopped talking and are circling the wagons.
No warrant. No probable cause, no exigence, no reasonable suspicion. They were told to leave, decided to stick a shoe in the door, that's all it takes for forced entry while armed, under color of law.
Time for the prosecutor to show his colors.
originally posted by: ObjectZero
Yup NC has some twisted protection on the books for warrantless search and actions. This not me saying I agree with them but they're there on the books for people to read. SC is just as bad as well. It's how the police are getting away with all the shootings. One of the reason I think they need to change them or at least put something in place to bring them back down to level. At least something along the line of, if police fail to follow procedure and in doing so harm or kill another they can no long be tried as law enforcement. All charges would be filed on them as if they where a normal citizen.
So in this case not only would this officer have murder charges placed on him but B&E as well, and maybe a few other if you want to get creative.