It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The first column I wrote on the Mizzou controversy analyzed the allegations and pointed out that firing a president had zero connection to any of the allegations or the demands for the protesters. In that column I accepted the protester's allegations as true. But as the week has gone on and the protesters have been exposed as anti-first amendment, selectively racist, and, last night, willing to perpetrate actual lies to get more attention, isn't it time to examine whether these incidents are actually real?
originally posted by: 8675309jenny
Ive been a bit out of the loop on domestic news lately, so I had to do some reading when I found out what all this Mizzou controversy was. I read a few pieces but this article pretty much sums up my suspicions on this matter. The article includes the update with the police report and photos of the poo-swastika, but it still does not remove suspicion that it could have been made by the very people wishing to stir up the controversy.
originally posted by: odzeandennz
its all lies... until the next monthly mass shooting motivated by hate occurs or another blatant act of bigotry pops up...
then we'll all be shocked and awe'ed and never have seen it coming, because there was no tell tell signs....