It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Actual Start of WW III

page: 3
9
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 14 2015 @ 03:55 PM
link   
Obama, David Cameron, and a few other heavyweight politicians, have all said that the war against Isil/ Daash would take a long time...

NATO could've eradicated them a long time ago but they chose not to- They came up with many excuses and when Russia started again against Isis recently, what was their response? Basically it was keep-away you're not helping.!

The reason for that is that Isil were doing the business of Israel's bidding- and this is the total eradication of all enemies in the area. Isis is therefore funded by the US and controlled by Mossad agents.

I would be amazed if France went alone on this...




posted on Nov, 14 2015 @ 05:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Emeth


NATO could've eradicated them a long time ago but they chose not to- They came up with many excuses and when Russia started again against Isis recently, what was their response?


In the UK "they" came up with a political unwillingness to intervene in Syria. A vote in Parliament. No excuses, but political will. In the meantime, ISIS has been ground down. Their expansion in Iraq has been checked and their leadership continues to be killed off.

Has Russia been able to anything since they arrived, apart from ship in lots of State-paid media?



posted on Nov, 14 2015 @ 10:50 PM
link   
Only Turkey has ever envoked Article V, if France does it...yes, let's call it WW3.

warmonitor.net...



posted on Nov, 14 2015 @ 10:52 PM
link   
Not a lot of people realize that France had a large warplan and was ready to enter Syria about 2 years ago, when Obama drew his red line.



posted on Nov, 16 2015 @ 10:11 PM
link   
Alliance failed then and Article 5 has not and will not be enacted and Obama has said "no change in strategy from the US side".

Sorry to all the WWIII mongers...aint happening due to this.
edit on 16-11-2015 by princeofpeace because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 20 2015 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Guenter
a reply to: asen_y2k

France left NATO in the 1960's for some time. So they got "experience" how to screw with NATO if they want to.


They did not leave, they just stopped playing war games with them. They were always there in a time of real war.



posted on Nov, 20 2015 @ 12:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: FlyingFox
Only Turkey has ever envoked Article V, if France does it...yes, let's call it WW3.

warmonitor.net...



Did you not even read your own news article??




Article 5 of the treaty states that an attack on one member is an attack on all of NATO. It has only been activated one time in history following the attacks on New York and Washington, which occurred on September 11, 2001.


warmonitor.net...



posted on Nov, 21 2015 @ 01:22 PM
link   
The way things are going, I personally believe that nuclear bombs will be used at some point against IS



posted on Nov, 23 2015 @ 07:08 PM
link   
Sadly, most Americans do not believe that there is even a remote possibility that we will ever fight a war with Russia.

But over in Russia, anti-American sentiment is at an all-time high and many of their talking heads and intellectuals are now convinced that a shooting war with the United States is inevitable.

For example, CBS News has documented that eight inch floppy disks are still being used in many of our missile silos. And don’t expect things to change any time soon.
At this point, the U.S. military plans to keep Minuteman intercontinental ballistic missiles that were originally deployed in the 1960s and 1970s in service until 2030.

What all of this means is that the Russians are feverishly preparing to fight World War III and we are not.
The key to winning World War III will be to strike hard and to strike fast, and the Russians understand this.
Meanwhile, the U.S. military has totally shifted gears from a “Cold War mindset” and is now completely focused on fighting smaller regional wars in the Middle East and elsewhere.
Imagine a scenario where Russian nuclear subs approach our coastlines completely undetected and launch a barrage of missiles toward our cities and military bases.
We could be wiped out before we even knew what hit us.

If you don’t think that this could ever happen, just consider the following Fox News article published back in 2012…


A Russian nuclear-powered attack submarine armed with long-range cruise missiles operated undetected in the Gulf of Mexico for several weeks and its travel in strategic U.S. waters was only confirmed after it left the region, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.

It is only the second time since 2009 that a Russian attack submarine has patrolled so close to U.S. shores.

If we can’t detect them, how are we going to defend against them?



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join