It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: soulpowertothendegree
a reply to: Profusion
The purpose of being a species of any kind is to procreate and keep the species alive and evolving, progression is a natural order of things, so while I understand your "pessimistic" outlook, if every species felt the same way there wouldn't be an Earth to worry about.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: olaru12
If you don't have enough sense to use your turn signals, you should't have kids.
lol, that.
Common sense isn't a requirement to breed, unfortunately.
originally posted by: GoShredAK
That boy was meant to be born.
originally posted by: Profusion
originally posted by: soulpowertothendegree
a reply to: Profusion
The purpose of being a species of any kind is to procreate and keep the species alive and evolving, progression is a natural order of things, so while I understand your "pessimistic" outlook, if every species felt the same way there wouldn't be an Earth to worry about.
You don't realize that "every species" does not have the capability of making a conscious choice about whether to procreate or not? In fact, humans are the only species that can make that choice.
That alone sets us apart from the other species. Since we have that level of conscious awareness, it's our duty to use it.
You're claiming something that just is completely false. Your argument is summed up in the following syllogism:
Humans are an animal species.
The purpose of being a species of any kind is to procreate and keep the species alive and evolving.
Therefore, humans must procreate to keep the species alive and evolving.
First of all, can you prove that the second line in the syllogism above is true? It looks like an assumption to me, not a statement of fact.
Furthermore, since humans have the capability of making a conscious choice about whether to procreate or not, the above syllogism does not apply to us.