BBC Propaganda - Blatant Beyond Words

Yea it's horribad everywhere...

Should we start posting better links to propagandamachines commentsections?

In finland where i live if you cant read english you have only few magazines with superpropaganda and it's annoying as fck.

delete

a reply to: Power_Semi

I actually have lost all respect for the political and international coverage of the BBC that we in britain are fed, essentially force fed by them, it is one of the oldest and most entrenched propeganda institutions in the world having served just this very purpose during world war two and also throughout the cold war period, today they are serving vested interests and they do not actually serve the tax payer or licence fee payer but they do serve a select group of global and local british power mongers whom are predominantly right wing.

They are no longer seen as impartial by the majority of the British public so welcome to the shared opinion of the masses.

What a lot of us are missing out on is the fact that this form of propeganda Media control was researched by both the CIA and British intelligence during the cold war, primarily to control the public (Anti democratic) as they feared any growth in left wing sympathy among the mass of the population.

It can actually be classified as and is actually a form of psychological brain washing and mind control and can also therefore be classified quite safely as a crime under international convention and international human right's treatis, indeed it is a subtle and long term level of control by psychological manipulation that completely undermines democratic process and free speech by entrenching idea's that the recipiant of this conditioning does not realise are not actually fact but opinion that is not really there own but they are conditioned to believe is there own.

Notice how the right wing are so EAGER to ditch human rights law's these day's especially in Britain after they deliberatly allowed those human right's law's to be abused then used there media propeganda tool to psychologically manipulate the public into associating human right's with hate mongers getting off the hook and escaping prosecution etc and many other cases while real cases were human right's law's were used correctly never recieved that or indeed any level of coverage at all as the Media and especially the BBC is a control mechanism which is wholy biased to show only the negative side in order to advance this hidden right wing agenda of the elite.

originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Power_Semi

They are reporting where crime details had been falsified either directly by the accuser, who in several cases is also the perpetrator, or it appears by those wishing to cover up the falsification - which of the items listed is a lie?

Why is that propaganda - they are reporting facts, and from what I have read that are factually correct in their reporting - it's not an opinion piece, it gives details of several crimes. If you see this as some kind of trashing people with white skin, then you might need to give those blinkers a bit of a stretch unless you can prove outright which of those cases is incorrect.

Let's deal with "why is this propaganda" since it's the most pertinent and demonstrable question.

Suppose I want to paint an unfair picture of black people as being violent child abusing rapists - I find a series of incidents, in this case (i.e. what the BBC have done) spanning decades, and actually continents, I create a "story" about it and title it something evocative like "Coloured Criminals: A history of Indecent Perverts" - and then I present my small number of case files as "evidence" that what I am saying is true.

Of course if the propaganda is even better ingrained I might give my story a more fitting title like : Coconut Criminal Scum: How the Black Man Rapes White Children.

It doesn't matter how evocative or un-evocative the headline is, apart from it reflecting societies stance to one group or another, all that matters is the content, and what I am putting in front of you is the undeniable, incontrivertible truth.

These people did indeed rape these children, and they were indeed black, and the victims were indeed white - so what does that tell us?

Do we now agree that ALL black people are child abusing rapist? of course not! But the more pertinent question would be to what ends was the person who created the "story" trying to lead us to.

What does the actual "story", in real terms, tell us?

It tells us NOTHING - the collection of criminals from one group who perpetrated similar crimes against similar ethnic groups proves NOTHING - you could literally collect the same kinds of data about any group against any other group, and publish a similar story - it doesn't matter if the perpetrator is black and the victim is white, or the perpetrator is white and the victim is black, or any combination of any other colours.

It means NOTHING - it is such a small data set that it means and represents nothing from and between one culture and another.

However, with the mass immigration to the EU, which will be heading to the UK before long, then what better time to START publishing stories about how white people are awful to non-white people.

And better than that - to really drive the hammer home - why not have a "guilty" white woman who blamed an "innocent" (ie non existant) black man - what a contrast - white vs black, innocent vs guilty, real vs imaginary.

etc - it's a nice side line against the usual "Male White Misoginist Bigot Nazi Racist Xenophobes Ageist Thugs" - lets have some left wing looking women into the mix too - they can also be racist - wouldn't have imagined that - they seem to be too much into the "all beat the male white racist guys" to be racist.

Anyway the point was not if one colour or race or religion or anything else is "better" or more "honourable" than another, it's to point out, as one reader got it, that all of what we witness is to do nothing more or less than to initiate a base, almost gutteral response from all of us, so that we absorbed by "black vs white" or "Christian vs Muslim" or whatever, anything other than the true cause of ALL of the pain in the world, the same thing it's been forever - and that is rich vs poor.

They don't care if you're black or white or yellow or red, or Christian or Muslim, or Buddhisst, or Sikh, or Hindu, or gay or straight, or male or female, or young or old, or anything else - so long as you are POORER than they are - they will make you work and pay and suffer and have just enough that you can survive, but not so much you can do it without coming back to work tomorrow.

It was always the same, it always will be until we can see through the crap and stop fighting each other and start fighting the true enemy - the ones who make it all happen to all of us.

originally posted by: Flavian
Can't disagree with this statement but at the same time, the article itself actually appears to be factually correct.

One has to remember that good disinfo agents always mix good info in with the bad.

In order to be effective, any disinformation operation MUST contain elements of truth.

Disinformation and rat poison are a lot alike that way.

To be effective, they both must look, taste, and smell like the real thing and contain some elements of truth.

Also confirmation bias comes into play here.

You "trust" the BBC more because they are telling you what you already believe.

a reply to: Power_Semi

I agree - The media is the weapon of the elite against the masses.

a reply to: Power_Semi
I really think you are getting too worked up about the BBC article - nothing in it appears factually incorrect, you are drawing the conclusions you wish to make about it. That doesn't make it blatant propaganda to anyone apart from you.

I guess it doesn't matter, you obviously have your own fixations so I'll leave you to it.

Damn 8.1, I have a lot of pictures of the loads of crap the migrants leave behind, and the poop left in buses, but the download from my library just does not work, some pictures are shocking, a group of migrants sat in a Christian graveyard having lunch, abandoned boxes of food, clothing, bottles of water, railway stations littered with trash, most telling of all, pictures full of military age males...

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: Power_Semi
The BBC is recognised as part of the left-wing "establishment" of Britain. The Guardian-readers.
On most issues, it will be found following the line of politcal correctness.

let's see...if a black person commits a crime against a white person, the news media is not allowed to show it....got it.

a reply to: jimmyx

The Europeans including the British are reaping the natural consequences of humanism and socialism. The initial benefits socialism were welcome. However, now you cannot protest the further socialist policies eg multiculturalism and anit .discrimination policies even if you can see the negative impact it is having. The Europeans have doomed their own cultures by adopting socialist policies. There will either be civil war or a slow conversion to 3rd world country. You can not have your cake and eat it! If our remove the concept of absolute right and wrong then it is up to the political consensus to determine was is acceptable [right] and unacceptable [wrong]. The Europeans will most probably revert to nationalism to sole the problem. More wars and persecutions. Of course you could immigrate to Australia were extreme socialist is having a tough time getting traction and immigration is tightly controlled.

Jim Crow is factually untrue? And Manifest destiny? Or how and why a some drugs are illegal? Rounding up Japanese and putting them into camps but giving Germans a pass?

Well, i'll be damned!