a reply to: Anaana
Right one cannot talk about failure until one establishes the parameters of success and i can only outline that from my own viewpoint, which is that
both material and spiritual development are the primary objectives in conjunction with establishing our place within the Heavens and that initiative
begins with the early Neolithic and the origins of modern European ancestry.
Mu viewpoint is that we had outside help in those developments and that in some sense forms a basis for perceived privilege, greater capacity, but i
also consider the greater objective would be to increase the lot of humanity overall from that first seed sown, so my idea of success is spiritual
awareness, physical well being and advanced technological achievement for the benefit of anyone and everyone, that's my idea of mission
Generally of course i am happy enough researching along those lines of enquiry, but it has to be taken into account that the outside help i have
suggested there constitutes in Hebraic tradition the origins of ultimate evil, the descent of wicked angels, the perpetuation of that evil through
their descendants and ongoing spiritual influence, so right there we have our first problem, and it's almost certainly derivative of advantage leading
It's considered these days that the overthrowing of Canaanite culture by the Hebrews was from within that culture and not outside invasion, that
revolt was undertaken against the ruling classes, upper levels of cities were destroyed the lower left untouched, so there was subversion, and
rebellion based upon resentments in conjunction with a counter ideology, which in terms of greater Hebrew tradition can only have involved the Divine
right of Kings and religious pluralism, the Semitic rulers there were empowered by developments from the core Neolithic region.
The Hebrews themselves duly established their basis for a counter chosen people tradition in terms of the establishment of the Tribes of Israel, the
ethnic basis for which involved Semitic inter-marriage from the Syrian populace of that time, to gain an advantage over the regular Semites, the flock
of Jacob was of the brown and speckled, the pure white remained in Syria with Laban, in symbolic terms, the point being they understood that
hereditary advantage had been created and aquired such for themselves, the lead role they now considered theirs alone.
The problem with their claim is that if you identify the contact that made development possible as evil then how can you possibly use any aspect of it
toward your agenda, they owed all their own development to neighbouring cultures, their entire exercise was based upon resentment and self serving
tribal ideology, but their repackaging and exploitation of the the development of others is the only deal on the table these days, they're the one's
with the culture.
As the criteria has to have been spiritual understanding in conjunction with technological development and the establishment of civilization, then
the latter two without the presence of the former is simply nightmare, the Indo-Europeans had spiritual tradition as the focal point of their culture
long before they really got anywhere in terms of technology and civil development, if the primary spiritual inclination is toward financial
exploitation of others as the very basis of your civilization you have a really serious problem, that constitutes failure.
Nations are failing because they think they can embrace technological development without an adequate spiritual framework, cultural relativism is
unacceptable, having said that greed and conflict has accelerated progress.
So that's the basis of my perspective, to answer your questions, failed nations are brutal and ignorant because of their inadequate spiritual belief
system and controls, no i'm not scared and yes i can see the perspective of others but the solution to any refugees problems lies within their own
country, i don't place any reservations with regards to assistance toward that end and providing a comprehensive refugee aid programme within
neighbouring countries, but i'm not in charge and it's not my foreign policy. my idea of helping people doesn't involve dropping a bomb on their
Europe has always been Multi-cultural even if that was only the Goths fighting the Romans, the slogan means little, what is actually required is a
common code of values and adherence too them not any amount of confusion, which returns to my opening premise that it entirely depends whose agenda
you are following, in the case of the progressives that is atheistic Marxism heavily promoted by the Jewish media or Conservative Protestantism and
the seeking of guidance from the Jewish old Testament, you can choose the left hand path or the right but essentially it's all the same, the
establishment of this primary leading role is what most of the wars are about.
My objectives relate to the original mission and it's satisfactory conclusion, the story of which is written in the stars if you require further
edit on Kpm1130311vAmerica/ChicagoSunday0830 by Kantzveldt because: (no reason given)