It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HorusChrist
come on folks I know it was 97 and cell phones weren't as prevalent but I know people had cameras then, no one could stop and take a pic if thousands saw it? Besides one video that shows just lights? I mean take a pic of this huge v shaped craft. Nothing? Gotta assume hoax then.
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
a reply to: JimOberg
I didnt see the witness testimony i was looking for in the OP video but the issue is observation time and proximity. I simply dont see how someone could watch this fly directly over their house while observing it for minutes and be mistaken. Ive never read anything to make me think this is a good ET case(imo probably a black project), but I personally have a hard time with the A10s completely explaining everything.
originally posted by: TeaAndStrumpets
....
So, what you're suggesting here, Jim -- what you constantly suggest here at ATS -- falls short not just in individual UFO cases like the Phoenix Lights. It actually fails to explain entire categories of UFO cases. Thousands and thousands of cases.
How much witness testimony are you prepared to throw out just because you already 'know' the one thing those witnesses couldn't possibly have seen?
From the same source as above:
No scientist who examines the subject objectively can claim for long that UFOs are solely the products of simple misidentification of normal objects and events.
Seems like a pretty radical statement... but it's not. It's all been said before. That particular statement was about 40 years ago. By Hynek. A scientist whose integrity, by the way, has not been questioned even by skeptics, even though he spent the better part of his life studying the UFO topic. And there he is, saying that it's basically intellectually dishonest to pretend that this misperception hypothesis can explain what we're seeing at the core of the UFO phenomenon.
And here you are Jim, 40 years later, still doing exactly that.
You're not just telling witnesses that they're mistaken. You're telling a good many of them that they actually must be lying, or must be going insane. Because misperception isn't always a viable possibility.
What I am saying is simply this: those people out there who are tempted to write off the entire phenomenon as witness misperception... first, maybe you owe it to yourselves to examine the serious history of the topic and see how this misperception theory that some people keep pushing has basically been disproven. It's not even that it's merely wrong; it's that it is so incorrect, its explanatory reach so limited, that any person who keeps promoting that hypothesis even after they claim to have seriously studied the topic has actually either not seriously studied the topic, or has ignored inconvenient data.
Yet it is Jim Oberg that keeps urging people to take a closer look at "the data"? Isn't that interesting? Yep. Don't people want to know more about how such divergent opinions can exist? I hope they do. Is "witness misperception" always a viable alternative hypothesis? No, actually, it isn't. But don't trust my word. To see what I mean, go read "The UFO Experience," a classic book in its category.
Once you lose the absolute barrier (armor?) that the misperception hypothesis provides, you've finally got to truly entertain the possibility that an intelligence we can't yet identify is somehow involved. And once you entertain that possibility, things like what these Phoenix Light witnesses claim to have seen are really not all so unbelievable. It'll become easier to cut through all the nonsense (on both sides) once you allow yourself to honestly consider other possibilities.
Here's the problem with your "misperception theory," Jim, as written by someone with much more knowledge than either of us. (Nevermind that Blue Book Special Report #14 basically disproved your misperception hypothesis over 60 years ago....)
originally posted by: JimOberg
What's your assessment of the significance of the consistent witness capability to report "giant mothership UFOs" when reentry fireball swarms are known to have been what they were actually looking at?
originally posted by: PindarAln
This was almost certainly the TR-6 TELOS which is currently based out of Edwards AFB and Groom Lake.
The TR-6 « TELOS » is designed for use as a transatmospheric low observable reconnaissance platform with global reach and a long loiter time over target. Employing active electromagnetic, electronic and visual camouflage it is able to penetrate all currently know defensive systems from transorbital height.
The TR-6 utilizes five electrogravitic generators for propulsion and is considered a « VSTOL » craft not needin a runway. The landing gear is strictly for maneuvering while on the ground. The wings foldfor hangar stowage.
Currently there are only a handful of hangars in the world that can accept the TR-6, with most of them in the US, he entire airframe acts as a multi-band communications relay capable of directly interfacing with all current US military satellite networks.
The skin employs active visual camouflage using a starfield lighting pattern along with other active stealth techniques. The TELOS plateform is also capable of operating in space as well as docking with military space stations via a ventral docking hatch.
The TR-6 is current flown by the 412th test wing at Edwards AFB. It has seen test flights out to Iceland and Scotland since September 2015.
originally posted by: chunder
a reply to: JimOberg
But Jim, it wasn't a fireball swarm, it wasn't anything extraordinary that could bring about the misperception that undoubtedly exists in such cases.
.....
Yes it does need to be looked at in context with similar cases, so yes inference can be drawn from Kiev and similar, but inference should then also be drawn from numerous cases where similar massive chevron / triangular craft have been reported.
Are we to take all these reports as misperception or is it more likely that there is another phenomenon involved here.
originally posted by: draknoir2
Just out of curiosity... what do re-entry fireball swarms have to do with anything that was reported during the Phoenix event?
Again, Red Herring fallacy.
And confirmation bias.
No one has claimed that human witnesses are not consistently capable of misidentifying fireball swarms.
Lets go with 50/50. That tells me that misperceptions can't be ruled out nor does it resolve this case or any other case where an exact cause hasn't been identified.
The issue, even as you have said, is the frequency of those misidentifications and the ratio of misidentifications to correct identifications.
one could read your entire diatribe with that image in mind....I may have to animate that.
If you're going to stomp around the place thumping your chest
..
people that saw flares just made honest mistake but the v shaped thing never existed, just a few people made up that hoax.
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
originally posted by: HorusChrist
come on folks I know it was 97 and cell phones weren't as prevalent but I know people had cameras then, no one could stop and take a pic if thousands saw it? Besides one video that shows just lights? I mean take a pic of this huge v shaped craft. Nothing? Gotta assume hoax then.
Im struggling mightily to figure out why you think this is a hoax? 911 phones light up, tons of testimony, it happened. We can debate all day about what it was, but it was a hoax because no picture? Do you think the entire city was in on this hoax?
Hopefully this reinforces the opposite thought, we know this event happened with a large population seeing it, but no pics... If a case like this cant produce several photos, what chance do other cases have?
originally posted by: TeaAndStrumpets
Since so many people here seem to think this case is solved, I guess
tldr but yeah just cuz they seemed to be telling the truth is meaningless. none coulda taken a pic?
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: draknoir2
Just out of curiosity... what do re-entry fireball swarms have to do with anything that was reported during the Phoenix event?
Again, Red Herring fallacy.
And confirmation bias.
The degree to which bright fireball swarms can elicit descriptions similar in MANY ways to other 'giant UFO mothership' reports strikes me as significant. The fireball swarms are of particular interest because their presence, timing, and motion can be determined with great accuracy and dependability. OTHER causes of similar raw visual stimuli [bright lights in night sky] are undocumentable, but MIGHT lead to similar witness reactions.
originally posted by: TeaAndStrumpets
It could've been any one of us who saw what they saw. So if you're a skeptic, forget for a moment that you don't think true UFOs are real or likely, and ask yourself... if you saw a true UFO with your own eyes, with the same level of certainty that's conveyed by these people, would you believe it?