Originally posted by spearchucker
Now im a liar,and treading on sacred ground
i tell you this much if i had any doubts ya sure cleared all that up for me.
Ithis is complettly insane, the proof is in the pudding, i come here with what i can assure you to be a accurate account of my experiance
Well dude this is what you posted in your thread entitled "What I Know".
"My uncle was raised in a very religous home and kept the faith for a long time. But a few years ago pronounced at a family gathering there is no god
and he was a athiest.Ok there are alot of atheist and im not here to knock them but my brother inlaws father was too.And comeing from this family and
this part of the country is pretty odd.Now at the funeral the masons all had hemlock branches and were chanting something, not your traditional
funeral huh."
Now, the total and utter fact of the matter is that you can't be a Freemason and be an atheist. There's no two ways about it. So for your uncle to
have this conviction and to loudly proclaim it and then for him to remain in Freemasonry is
extremely unlikely. In fact it's not a scenario
that I have
ever heard of and I know of no other Freemason who knows of an atheist remaining within masonry.
The hemlock branches comment is also extremely dodgy.
So quite simply, you were put straight. There wasn't one single thing in the thread that could be construed as flaming or jumping down your throat.
You, on the other hand, ended with the comment - "I came here thinking most not all of you people are creepy and after this I am convinced."
As you have stated, you had already made up your mind and somehow you have read insult into the replies that you were given and this has confirmed
your suspicions. So basically, you are the one who is at fault here. You can't whine at others for answering your claims with the truth and you
can't whine at others for putting you straight when you display ignorance. That is not flaming you or putting you down. It is quite simply correcting
somebody who is wrong.
And I'm sorry Intrepid, but this guy
is ignorant. If you read through his previous thread and then read his reply here, you will realise this
to be so. Basing his opinion on falsities and then reading insults into replies where none exist is not denying ignorance.