It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Nyiah
Are we in the wrong thread, LOL?
I just noticed this, what the hell just happened to this page? ROTFL, I can't blame it on having more than one open --I don't, I had the Bernie thread open. Where did this one come from? Halloween trick or treat hijinks on ATS? I'll edit where appropriate, not applicable to this thread at all.
originally posted by: infolurker
Now, I am not familiar with either party here but from face value it is poetic justice.
originally posted by: bluesman462002
a reply to: infolurker
Advice to her Husband.
Fire Her, Divorce Her and Send Her to Afghanastan.
See How Well That MOUTH Works There.
LOL
originally posted by: Gryphon66
If Thunderfoot wanted to go after the Laughing Witch that's one thing.
But if what she did to him was wrong, I can't see how we can justify what 400,000 (or some portion) of his followers did to her.
She acted out of disagreement with his politics, and so did they.
originally posted by: mclarenmp4
originally posted by: Gryphon66
If Thunderfoot wanted to go after the Laughing Witch that's one thing.
But if what she did to him was wrong, I can't see how we can justify what 400,000 (or some portion) of his followers did to her.
She acted out of disagreement with his politics, and so did they.
If Laughing Witch didn't go after Thunderfoot in his personal life by going to his employment and trying to get him sacked that's one thing.
But she did and if you attack someone personally and not his youtube channel then you can expect the person to respond in kind. Was it disproportionate to her original crime, in my mind no. If she had succeeded and he did lose his job would it be disproportionate to expect the same of her?
So you reap what you sow, fight dirty expect dirty to fight back.
I don't know how to make this go away," Burns told WUSA9 on Thursday. "We've apologized. This has nothing to do with my business.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: infolurker
Anyone who self-identifies as a "Social Justice Warrior" is going to be a scumbag. I don't really need to know more about her.
originally posted by: angrypsycho1977
Here is a view from the other side of the story I found while looking for more info on this story. It is biased in her direction, but gives a different perspective that many may not be seeing.
Link
The story of this particular debacle began this past January when the YouTuber who calls herself Laughing Witch sent a letter to Mason’s employer
Her email was part of a letter-writing campaign by a number of feminist Youtubers who hoped their letters would get Mason fired from his research job.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
i bet her old man is one of them namby pamby's that lets his old run around and sleep with any one she wants, while he stay's home.
that's why his let his business get involved and now is bankrupt.
I'll ask just for the sake of the conversation ... is there any chance this comment is satire?
If not, what would the couple's sexual habits have to do with ... well, anything?
originally posted by: angrypsycho1977
Here is a view from the other side of the story I found while looking for more info on this story. It is biased in her direction, but gives a different perspective that many may not be seeing.
Link