It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alleged War Criminal gives partial apology for Iraq and ISIS

page: 2
17
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 26 2015 @ 03:47 AM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

I thought the agent they found was from the first Gulf war that had been destroyed by weapons inspectors after that war.
As far as I'm aware no usable WMD were found.




posted on Oct, 26 2015 @ 03:59 AM
link   
"Sorry for drinking the kool-aid, old chaps. Let me buy you a pint or two as a sign of my sincerity."


Words you will never hear from a politician.




posted on Oct, 26 2015 @ 06:26 AM
link   
Yeah, he should be apologising, but only after his appearance and sentencing at the Hague.



posted on Oct, 26 2015 @ 09:23 AM
link   
a reply to: gortex

No the were still caches and stock piles that were found,the other stuff was removed by Russian Spetznatz ,and taken to syria.
They had a fledgling nuke program but it wasn't active.



posted on Oct, 26 2015 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: gortex

No the were still caches and stock piles that were found,the other stuff was removed by Russian Spetznatz ,and taken to syria.
They had a fledgling nuke program but it wasn't active.

If so why are we hearing this from you and not the MSM who couldn't find anything to back up and justify the invasion of a foreign nation. ?

Iraq had no wmd's. The countries that invaded them did....in the thousands. Blair and Bush should be shot at dawn for their treachery.



posted on Oct, 26 2015 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

I'd be interested to know the source of that information , I remember the claims of mobile labs that turned out to be farming equipment and the discovery that I mentioned above that turned out to be old and put out of commission years before.

If WMD were found why isn't Blair using it as justification for his actions ?



posted on Oct, 26 2015 @ 10:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol

Because I did research into it by using GOOGLE,it's an internet search engine used on home computers...www.thepoliticalinsider.com...
larsenfinancial.us...
I could tell you what my fellow scouts told me who were there, but people seldom believe us.
edit on 26-10-2015 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2015 @ 10:50 AM
link   
a reply to: gortex

The British were duped by the US.
I really don't know WHY we went to war with Iraq as these were nothing large.
I wonder if we were embarrassed by his use of them on the Kurds.
It wasn't for the reasons we were told.
Bush was Cheney's tool under Daddy anyway,all the more reason to forget Jeb.
edit on 26-10-2015 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2015 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: gortex

Blair just like bush is just another war criminal

And all of them banker's puppets



posted on Oct, 27 2015 @ 10:32 AM
link   
No one is going to face any charges and no one should. Iraq was in blatant violation of dozens of lawfully-enacted UN sanctions and SH was a flagrant and open violator of virtually every anti-torture and human rights convention and treaty in existence. Sorry that no one else had the balls to act. If Iraq can't get its act together and join the 21st century at this point, that's on them, not me or any other Nation. And yes, if you do not support the ousting of SH you do in fact support torture and puppet governments. Pick your poison and stick with it, people.



posted on Oct, 27 2015 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: jaffo
, if you do not support the ousting of SH you do in fact support torture and puppet governments. Pick your poison and stick with it, people.



Shouldn't by that logic Saudi Arabia have gone first?



posted on Oct, 27 2015 @ 10:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: jaffo
, if you do not support the ousting of SH you do in fact support torture and puppet governments. Pick your poison and stick with it, people.



Shouldn't by that logic Saudi Arabia have gone first?


Depends. Are they in flagrant violation of UN sanctions, which was the basis for the invasion?



posted on Oct, 27 2015 @ 10:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: jaffo

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: jaffo
, if you do not support the ousting of SH you do in fact support torture and puppet governments. Pick your poison and stick with it, people.



Shouldn't by that logic Saudi Arabia have gone first?


Depends. Are they in flagrant violation of UN sanctions, which was the basis for the invasion?


Well to take your quote :




you do not support the ousting of SH you do in fact support torture and puppet governments


Then:

If you dont support he ousting of SA you do in fact support torture and puppet governments



posted on Oct, 27 2015 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: jaffo

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: jaffo
, if you do not support the ousting of SH you do in fact support torture and puppet governments. Pick your poison and stick with it, people.



Shouldn't by that logic Saudi Arabia have gone first?


Depends. Are they in flagrant violation of UN sanctions, which was the basis for the invasion?


Well to take your quote :




you do not support the ousting of SH you do in fact support torture and puppet governments


Then:

If you dont support he ousting of SA you do in fact support torture and puppet governments


Fine, I would support invading SA. We done here? Or should we keep moving the goalposts and subverting logic to keep bashing America and our allies in the face of reason? (EDIT: Point taken with a wink and a nod, of course.)
edit on 27-10-2015 by jaffo because: Humor



posted on Oct, 27 2015 @ 05:09 PM
link   
a reply to: crazyewok

...and it's those backers and bankers who now reap the benefits. Let's not forget the lucrative trade Blair plied after he 'left' politics in the UK. First by expanding his empire to the oil-rich South Sudan and also brokering a $1bn deal between Libya and the US on behalf of the soon to ousted Gaddafi. An article in The Telegraph stated...
"The committee is looking to investigate why Blair, who is thought to have visited Libya at least six times after leaving office in 2007, "intervened" on behalf of Gaddafi.

Blair allegedly attempted to agree a number of economic and business deals during his trips to Libya and has since built up a fortune estimated at £60 million."

The committee formed because he was a subject of a parliamentary inquiry.

For me this always comes back to the bankers, and to some extent the very wealthy 'families', and how they have been involved in all of this and maybe the 'allegation of WMD's' was just a smokescreen that they hoped would give them plausible deniability rather than finding a way into those countries central banking systems and effectively 'calling the shots' later on down the line.



posted on Oct, 27 2015 @ 05:29 PM
link   
The fact that these mass murderers aren’t getting tried is proof we live in a dictatorship were criminals like this can get away with mass murder and crimes as bad as anything Hitler, Stalin, Mao did or any of the all time evil doers of history.

Bush, Cheney, this creep, and many others are no better than the Nazis and Hitler.


In-fact they may be worse because of the pretension that they are doing good


They deserve to be tried in a Nuremburg type trial


The fact that theirs is nothing on this planet to enforce that trial is proof were living in a tyranny of evil


I believe there should be a world-wide mass movement that demands they be tried and convicted and punished

Also, OBAMA should be tried for complicity




top topics



 
17
<< 1   >>

log in

join