It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary’s Video Claim Officially Proven to Be Deliberate Lie

page: 5
43
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:10 AM
link   
And here's one the several controlled (by Democrats) Q's&A's ...



She went on the offensive…

In a tone that mingled defiance with disdain, Hillary Clinton turned a softball question from a Democratic congressman into a line drive aimed at the House Benghazi committee.

Clinton was asked by Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. how she felt about allegations that she deliberately interfered with security in Benghazi that resulted in the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

Watch The 10 Words Hillary Just Told Benghazi Committee That Will Have EVERYONE In Disbelief






posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:13 AM
link   
No finding of error or fault ?

Even the New York Times articles back in 2011, state clearly the weapon shipments to Libya were illegal. That's just ONE issue here. Now they have the emails on the issue that she wrote !

No error or wrong doing, that's just intentionally being dishonest.



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:15 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Democrats aren't members of the House as well?

What's the point?

Where's the proof of wrongdoing?

Where's the evidence of a stand-down order?

Where are the facts that could in any way justify continuing this politically-motivated, expensive abuse of government power on the part of the Republican House?



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
No finding of error or fault ?

Even the New York Times articles back in 2011, state clearly the weapon shipments to Libya were illegal. That's just ONE issue here. Now they have the emails on the issue that she wrote !

No error or wrong doing, that's just intentionally being dishonest.


Why is the House not bringing charges then?

If there is so much evidence, clear evidence, of illegal activity on the part of Clinton, Obama, et. al. ... where are the indictments?
edit on 11Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:17:52 -050015p1120151066 by Gryphon66 because: formatting



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:17 AM
link   
Well... To do so would have to admit in full light the administration is supporting "not so moderate" rebels in multiple theaters of action over the last 4-5 years. Which would also implicate many people on the other side of the aisle *cough*john McCain*cough.

I'd suppose that's why.

edit on 23-10-2015 by CrawlingChaos because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
Well... To do so would have to admit in full light the administration is supporting "not so moderate" rebels in multiple theaters of action over the last 4-5 years.

I'd suppose that's why.


Why wouldn't the Republican House of Representatives, having clear evidence of illegal activity on the part of either President Obama or Secretary Clinton, bring appropriate charges?

Or are the Republicans in on the vast conspiracy as well?



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos

The real scandal here, is the Secretary of State ignored the law and Ok'ed weapon sales on the down-low to known and listed terrorists and subsequent organizations.



Yes, and that was brought to light in the hearing, thanks to the committee for
examining her record and emails.


Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was forced Thursday to address for the first time reports of U.S. involvement in supplying arms to Libyan rebels during the revolution and later transferring weapons to Syrian rebels fighting to overthrow the government of President Bashar Assad.

The weapons are believed to have fallen the hands of jihadist and fueling the raise of the terrorist army known as Islamic State.


And Hillary did this while it was banned, aka Against The Law.

www.washingtontimes.com...



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
Well... To do so would have to admit in full light the administration is supporting "not so moderate" rebels in multiple theaters of action over the last 4-5 years.

I'd suppose that's why.


Why wouldn't the Republican House of Representatives, having clear evidence of illegal activity on the part of either President Obama or Secretary Clinton, bring appropriate charges?

Or are the Republicans in on the vast conspiracy as well?



It's not conspiracy, it's proven fact. The republicans wanted to support the wacko's in Libya just as much as the administration did. THAT DOES NOT MAKE IT OK. Libya, the terrorists there, the state departments actions, support from Republican hawks ; Is the root of the issue in Syria right now.

Adding personal business gains into the mix makes it even more disgusting, to me atleast you seem 'cool' with it.

my answer still stands to your previous question.



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:25 AM
link   
They've spent more time investigating this than the assassination of JFK -- the killing of a sitting US president.

That's pretty telling to me.

Our country has seen terrible loss through the utter incompetence of those we've entrusted with power -- and yet in those larger, more obscene cases we've never spent this much time investigating.

This isn't helping the GOP, and in all reality it's giving Hillary free exposure.

I don't want another Clinton back in the White House, but by dragging this investigation out like this, they're helping do just that.

Charger her, indict her and put her to trial -- doing this theatrical dog and pony show is having the opposite intended effect...



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Why is the House not bringing charges then?

If there is so much evidence, clear evidence, of illegal activity on the part of Clinton, Obama, et. al. ... where are the indictments?


Soon enough after all the investigations and future evidence is verified.

Watch for actions next year.




posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Or are the Republicans in on the vast conspiracy as well?


Poor Poor Hillary, First her philandering partner, now she
has become the victim of a vast right wing conspiracy!

On the Today Show with Matt.




posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:39 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

And the media LOVES to praise her for her "STAMINA, while being bombarded with questions for 10 hours straight. She kept her poise, she was confident, she acted so mature, etc. etc. "

That woman deserves to be in a 3rd-world prison cell. Terrible human being, she literally makes my skin crawl



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:40 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

She's a liar and a criminal, those would be THE BEST 2 words to describe her.



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Why is the House not bringing charges then?

If there is so much evidence, clear evidence, of illegal activity on the part of Clinton, Obama, et. al. ... where are the indictments?


Soon enough after all the investigations and future evidence is verified.

Watch for actions next year.






I don't think will happen. It would be an absolute unmistakable admission of inpropriaty and illegal action. While I would love to see Clinton stung up for this, and then used to go after McCain, and the President, and so forth till they were all in jail for supporting terrorism and crimes against humanity for supporting ISIS and associates.

The reason there will be nothing done, is because it is way bigger than just Clinton. But to sit there and say Clinton did nothing wrong, is just lying thru your teeth.



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:50 AM
link   
The witch hunt failed.
And
I can't stand her.
All that happened is that she got free TV time.



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 11:57 AM
link   


While Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, she supported a covert exchange of weapons to Libyan rebels, some of whom then conducted the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, according to federal court documents obtained by Fox News.

Career CIA officer David Manners offered sworn testimony to the District Court of Arizona on May 5, 2015, claiming, "It was then, and remains now, my opinion that the United States did participate, directly or indirectly, in the supply of weapons to the Libyan Transitional National Council (TNC)."

The Democratic presidential front-runner even suggested the idea in a recently disclosed secret email to long-time confidant Sidney Blumenthal. Dated April 8, 2011, Clinton wrote, "Fyi. The idea of using private security experts to arm the opposition should be considered," reported the New York Post.

Hillary Clinton May Have Committed Treason In Benghazi By Facilitating Weapons Sales To Rebels Who Killed Americans


Oh the Obama Administration is dirty !!




posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 12:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


edit on 23-10-2015 by Voyaging because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

"The Democratic presidential front-runner even suggested the idea in a recently disclosed secret email to long-time confidant Sidney Blumenthal. Dated April 8, 2011, Clinton wrote, "Fyi. The idea of using private security experts to arm the opposition should be considered," reported the New York Post."

Hillary Clinton May Have Committed Treason In Benghazi By Facilitating Weapons Sales To Rebels Who Killed Americans


Oh the Obama Administration is dirty !!



In it deep together.

I recall Rand Paul grilling her on the gun running in the Benghazi hearings.



This is Hillary's insurance plan, that the Obama Administration did
nothing but turn a blind eye ( at least if this was not part of some
deeper plan to continue Middle East destabilization ) to an ILLEGAL WAR.

I challenge anyone to show me Congressional approval for the Libyan war!!!

Secret war, covert gun running, Hillary was doing it all.


The documents, obtained by The Washington Times, show U.S. diplomats at the Benghazi compound were keeping track of several potential U.S.-sanctioned shipments to allies, one or more of which were destined for the Transitional National Council, the Libyan movement that was seeking to oust Gadhafi and form a new government.
www.washingtontimes.com...




edit on 23-10-2015 by burntheships because: fix links



posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 12:22 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

She says she doesn't have any information on that.

Which actually means she has *ALL* the information.




posted on Oct, 23 2015 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

She says she doesn't have any information on that.



Yep, cant remember on that hearing, was she under oath?

Maybe she cant remember if it was herself alone, or if it was
the Clinton Crime Foundation arms deals to Saudi Arabia?

151 Billion PLUS dollars - Clintons State Department authorized
$151 billion (PLUS) Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 countries that donated
to the Clinton "Crime" Foundation.


In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.

The Saudi deal was one of dozens of arms sales approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department that placed weapons in the hands of governments that had also donated money to the Clinton family philanthropic empire, an International Business Times investigation has found.

Under Clinton's leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure -- derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012) -- represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.
www.ibtimes.com... -ask-hillary-clinton&email_referrer=what-congress-should-ask-hillary-clinton



new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join