It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


John lennon. Who was the catcher in the rye?

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 12:16 AM
People say they have the killer.
Everyone believed it...
Why wouldnt they? they got theyre revenge..

or did they?

Ive been thinking latley.... it seems so clear to me that the CIA assassinated John lennon. and the caught killer was just a brainwashed prop ('___' in his system perhaps?)

after all, John lennon did say, "If me and yoko did, it wasnt an accident"

Also, the FBI has 216 POUNDS of information on John lennon , and based on my current knowledge, they released all but 10 papers....

wahts so important that even 30 years later it cant be released?

does anyone know any info im missing to this puzzle?
any help?

and by all means , critisize my theory.

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 01:53 AM
sorry... a quick correction on my orrigional post..

john lennon said , "If me and yoko DIE, it wasnt an accident"

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 02:09 AM
John Lennon's voice in many ways spearheaded the peace movement.

This resulted in a powerful anti-war sentiment all across the globe.

He showed many of us how do look at things differently and to
question authority.


the world in peace

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 02:18 AM
but why would anyone assassinate a man looking for world peace?

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 02:26 AM
To answer that question one must look at who profits from the business of war.

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 02:50 AM
hmmmm...... not the drug organizations... after all john lennon was using drug hhaha..... so.. the government.. the WERE watching them... that i know for sure.. 216 pounds of info on John Lennon..

But we still lack a motive!!

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 10:57 AM
ok, heres what i heard about the conspiracy on that. the gov did kill off jimmy janice and james, but not john. there was always a conspiracy that they wanted to off the 3 of them, and in 1998 or so one of the key players confessed from his deathbed.

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 12:03 PM
this might help a little...

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 03:24 PM
yes i ahve been there and looked at that.... but i still dont see a motive for killing john lennon.... who would bennifit from his death..??

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 03:41 PM

Originally posted by ivanglam
but why would anyone assassinate a man looking for world peace?

Hmmm, who else wanted some peace?

Martin Luther King
Malcom X
John F Kennedy
Princess Diana


posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 03:43 PM
ok we have a list of people who wanted peace... but who DOESNT.. thats the real question...

NWO, secret societys?? .... US economy??..

the big question.. who?

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 03:47 PM
Satan. Or if you don't believe in Satan, then substitute it for the Worlds leaders, whoever they really are. Simple

posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 04:11 PM
ha ha ha .. but i am looking for a more precise person or agency..

posted on Jan, 5 2005 @ 03:37 PM
That Lennon and King were both killed for the same reasons. Because they were a HUGE influence on the entire world that WERE BOTH probablly close to bringing about world peace. Can't have that when the people who make the weapons also run the show.

Its hard to believe but there are actually people in this world who PREFER a world at war JUST because they make money off of it. I know eh? Its just unreal that these people are allowed to exist.

I think it should be against the law for private individuals to make money from weapons. There is just too much motivation for them to not work towards peace in that case. And it SHOULD be everyones job to be working for a world free of conflict... reguardless if it is possible or not.

posted on Jan, 5 2005 @ 04:28 PM
Who did it? Okay, let me offer my perspective. First off, Lennon was against religion, money, war and oppression. What things really make America tick these days? Religious propaganda(used to sway voters), money/capitalism, war/defense industry, oppression/corporate govt./poverty/less civil rights. His views could be compared to communism or more accurately, socialism. Now think about it. What has been the biggest threat to the American govt./elite leaders in the past 100 years? The threat of putting the power back in the hands of the people, that's why we were so anti-communist. Isn't giving people the power one of the things John Lennon stood for. Not in an aggressive way, but in a more peaceful and accepting way. That's why he was dangerous, b/c there was really no way that he could be discredited or made the victim of hate propaganda, b/c he was too nice and compassionate.

Allright, well now, who are the people who stand to gain from oppression and war? The upper echelon of the U.S. govt? The CIA? The NWO/Bilderberg/Illuminati? I can't say for sure, but it is definitely one or more of who I just listed who was behind Lennon's death, if not most history-altering events.

posted on Jan, 5 2005 @ 09:09 PM
well said.. that is quite true.

new topics

top topics


log in