as posted by PistolPete
On the subject of the planes: it didn't say that they were either or - the three planes easily could have been two of one and one of the other. It's
basically a semantics argument.
Quite possibly so, but if this is simply a case of semantics, when applied to the number and type of aircraft, its
not semantics that they were
identified, alledged, and then reported as being U.S. though, huh? I find it rather hilarious that the sources can't identify an aircraft type, but
they can identify the aircraft as being a U.S. "type" aircraft? Semantics, indeed, despite it being dubious, and highly questionable!
The problem here is that these claims, as from the original article, is/are mixing "identified" with "unidentified." Let me guess, because of
"the US is urging allies to confront Iran over its nuclear program," the "unidentified" incursions are partially becoming "identified,"
in that they are being reported as U.S. jet fighter incursions?
Then again, its all semantics....*shrugs*
seekerof
[edit on 3-1-2005 by Seekerof]