It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Climate Finance" is a bigger business than oil and military combined!

page: 1
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 07:39 PM
link   
I always wonder why people don't do research on their own. It is not difficult to study enough about climate to realize that we were due for an ice age, and now it is actually beginning. Most people aren't prepared because it's the opposite of what we were always told, so most of the world will die. Obviously this is the ultimate goal of the elite, because anyone on this site should know that "they" won't need workers anymore because robots will eventually take over any work. But anyway:

Climate Finance is a business with a yearly expenditure of between $1.1 trillion and $1.5 trillion, depending on the source. All of the major oil companies combined have a yearly profit of less than $100 billion. The American military has a yearly expenditure of about $600 billion, and which is by far the biggest spender on military overall.

The $1.1 - 1.5 trillion "Climate Finance" money is collected indirectly from the people themselves, and the money is spent mysteriously.

The oil profits, on the other hand, are made by providing the people a product they need.

The more I examine the climate fraud going on in the world, the more I am fearful. It is blasphemy to question man-made climate-change. It is a religion. Even if deserts expand just like an Ice Age, and areas that were once covered in glaciers are becoming brutally cold just like an Ice Age, there are excuses like, "Some areas will get colder." People become angry if you question the "95% consensus", which was actually a statistic from an online survey of 75 out of 77 graduate students, who would definitely not have found a job or funding if they didn't agree with those with the money and power.

Like Dyson said, "Follow the money." I'm assuming the $1.1 - 1.5 trillion is used to brain-wash the population into accepting their own demise for the benefit of the planet.




posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Robotswilltakeover

Sources please.



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 07:55 PM
link   
Just no.



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:01 PM
link   

All of the major oil companies combined have a yearly profit of less than $100 billion.



Wait for it...


Edit:

edit on 18-10-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)






There's more...
edit on 18-10-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)




Edit:



I'll keep doing this until you source that claim.
edit on 18-10-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)




Edit:

edit on 18-10-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)





Edit:



Shouldn't take you that long, surely?
edit on 18-10-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)



Edit:


Who am I kidding, I'm still laughing.





On topic, so my great post isn't deleted...

You used all the right buzzwords of an anti-CC proponent...
Religion, check.
Wouldn't have a job, check.

A myriad of others I couldn't care to list at the moment.


You haven't left much room for discussion, really.

Sources please.
edit on 18-10-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Robotswilltakeover

That is your opinion.

Care to cite sources that back up this claim?(opinion pieces are NOT sources)

You will likely get a lot of stars and flags. Denying climate change has become quite trendy here.

P.S.,

Here is a link that breaks down where the 97% comes from:

www.skepticalscience.com...

edit on 18-10-2015 by jrod because: add



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:07 PM
link   
So roughly 2% of the global GDP is being spent strategically as long-term insurance on known potential calamities due to wreckless industry. Plenty of jobs coming online and innovation all around with this. What's not to love?



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:10 PM
link   
a reply to: jrod

My first sentence:

"I always wonder why people don't do research on their own."

Please tell me where I'm wrong. I'm asking people to do their own research. I'm open-minded. Convince me otherwise.

But here's a random source I found that you could've googled yourself in 30 seconds:

www.americanprogress.org... ks/



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Robotswilltakeover

The onus is on you. You're making the claims. As the OP you should do the due dilligence. We're not going to source out your bogus claims, but for the record your comparison is illogical. Oil has low profit margin. Look up how much is generated and reinvested to keep the black spice flowing.



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Robotswilltakeover

So you think a right wing opinion piece is a valid source of information? Also that opinion piece makes no mention of climate fear mongering being a trillion dollar business.

This thread is worthy of the hoax or disinformation bin.


edit on 18-10-2015 by jrod because: add



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:18 PM
link   
en.m.wikipedia.org...


Here is Saudi Aramco...
Just one Oil Company who made 350+ billion in 2014 all by themselves.


LOL.

I'm not laughing anymore, that's a forum suggestion.



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: jrod

Find another source, please. I would love to change my mind if someone could convince me that any of what I've written is wrong.



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:20 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Most appropriate overkill post I've ever seen



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:21 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Thank you! If that is true, Climate Finance is only triple or quadruple the oil business rather than ten or twelve times bigger.



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Robotswilltakeover

It is wrong, because you're not making a proper assessment. You act as if the monies spent on climate mitigation are not benefiting society. It's ignorant, at the very least. You didn't address the fact that you're comparing apples to oranges, either. I made this clear in my prior post. Guess you don't wanna respond?



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:23 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: pl3bscheese

It is not my business how oil profits are spent. They are companies providing people with a product. They can spend it on booze & women for all I care. But, where is all the "Climate Finance" money going? That is the more mysterious question.
edit on 18-10-2015 by Robotswilltakeover because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Robotswilltakeover

Renewable energy and more intelligent housing for people. This does not help, regardless of carbon emissions? We got a pollution problem, wouldn't you agree?



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

You're on fire!



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Robotswilltakeover

Okay, if you're that confused, I'll just stop. You say to do research, but yours is obviously lop sided.



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Robotswilltakeover
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Thank you! If that is true, Climate Finance is only triple or quadruple the oil business rather than ten or twelve times bigger.


You're clearly sticking to this pricing malarkey...


So here is an analogy.


You have a Ming Dynasty Vase. (Earth)
It's free. It's abundant with all you need.


I come along (deforesters, polluters, resource thiefs etc) and smash your Ming Dynasty Vase (Earth) into a thousand pieces...



It cost me zero to do what I did. (Destroy)

For you to repair it will cost you quite a hefty some.
But if it makes your Ming Dynasty Vase (Earth) good as new, it's worth it.
edit on 18-10-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)



new topics




 
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join