It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


What was the plan of the West regarding Syria? EXPOSED!

page: 1
<<   2 >>

log in

+4 more 
posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 02:10 PM
We know now they deliberately wanted to destabilize Syria as they did to Iraq and Libya.

But what was the end game of NATO’s sinister plot?

As the wretched leaders of the West are bellowing like sick Hyenas, the French Holland, the English Cameron and the other crime leaders, Obama, and the German Merkel (who has had to suffer the bulk of the immigrants for the NATO scam in Syria) as Russia turns their plot to ashes.

Its like a broken record to listen to these international war criminals from NATO

What did they expect?

I think they expected ISIS to begin to exterminate many of the Syrians and with ISIS’ reputation the world would have said: “WE HAVE TO INTERVENE”

It's absolutely clear this was their plan by the way they all follow the same script in response to Putin’s intervention.

Indeed then NATO with the UN’s blessing would have had the excuse to go in and legally dismember Syria and impose their own solution.

David Cameron
Francois Hollande
Barack Obama



posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 02:21 PM
a reply to: Willtell

It might suit too, that Russia is now embroiled in a proxy war in Syria. It will further stretch their economy, on top of sanctions etc. I do wonder if the US is not contravening international law by supplying arms and equipment to the various groups in the region.

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 02:23 PM
a reply to: Willtell

The plan is to bring in the New Caliphates. The Revived Ottoman and Persian Empires.

To do that, complete destabilization is needed.

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 02:33 PM
a reply to: infolurker

Why would TPTB want that?What would that accomplish?

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 02:38 PM
I'm going to need links and sources before I can take you seriously.

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 02:40 PM
a reply to: buckwhizzle

An excuse for the West to invade Syria to stop ISIS from murdering the whole country.

A great scheme

NATO would sacrifice all those people just for their geopolitical scheme of taking down Assad and taking over Syria.

The Libyan adventure didn’t work out so well so this time they created a proxy terror army they might control

Even then they could send them to Libya and murder some more Arabs
.... And have another excuse to take over Libya as well

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 02:41 PM
a reply to: buckwhizzle

An excellent venue for arms sales...manipulation of commodities on the international market...a source of fear and division of various countries citizens to further engender control...I dunno

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 02:56 PM
a reply to: Willtell

It would seem that Russia is a step or two ahead of NATO and their plans . I listened to Webster Tarpley today and some of the news is coming out that Putin's Russia has them and others in check ..."Russia using electronic warfare to cloak its actions in Syria from Isis and Nato"

Fed up of the West's indecisiveness on dealing with the ongoing situation in Syria, Russia is now providing direct military air support to Syria, and it is using electronic warfare to jam Islamic State's (IS) communications, as well as to prevent Nato from detecting what it is up to, according to an electronic warfare expert.

Electronic warfare is the ability to manipulate the electromagnetic spectrum in order to sense where enemy targets are so that you can attack the enemy first, or to prevent the enemy from attacking you. Examples of things you can do with electronic warfare include communications jamming, radar jamming, reconnaissance and countermeasures using infrared, radio and electro-optical frequencies.

On 5 October, Russian military Krasukha-4, its mobile, ground-based electronic warfare systems, were spotted in Syria. The Krasukha-4 is a broadband multifunctional jamming station that is based on a BAZ-6910-022 four-axle-chassis and is able to neutralise low-Earth orbit (LEO) spy satellites such as the US Lacrosse/Onyx series, airborne surveillance radars and radar-guided ordinance at ranges between 150km-300km. This is not a issue there is a quick fix for and will take time to counter for NATO . The US may have it figured out as the Russians gave them a glimpse of it near the Crimea

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 03:06 PM
You didn't really expose anything you just have us your opinion

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 03:07 PM
a reply to: Willtell

2nd line

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 03:20 PM
What you are talking is genocide and crimes against humanity.

While I can't say I entirely disagree with your premise, it is lacking in facts and sources.

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 04:06 PM
you forgott to mention Ukraine.... :-)a reply to: Willtell

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 04:16 PM
its all about the trauma of the USA against Russia...
the USA diddend take the full advantige to take Russia over by the Gorbatshov/Jeltsin periods...
now there facing Putin who brought Russia back on the maps...
(one Putin is moore in the scale than all western leaders together)
the western economy is falling apart today... desperatly seeking new markets to grow witch aint an succes...
now there playing there cards for an better solution... total war...!
as it seems now Russia has an better hand at the world poker table..... a reply to: ressiv

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 04:34 PM
I don't think the West had a plan except the removal of dictators off the back of high discontent with how things are run in North Africa and the Middle East.

The intervention in Libya was to prevent Gadhafi killing off the popular uprisings and NATO enforced a "no fly" zone supported by the UN. If Gadhafi had not tried to push the point he would probably have remained in power, but he did insist on sending in the tanks and the rest is history.

In Syria intervention was through supporting groups opposed to the brutal Assad after he started to crush a popular uprising, as seen across the ME. The timidity and indecision of the West allowed groups like ISIS to flourish (brutality of Assad breeding brutality) and overflow into Iraq, hence military intervention at the request of the Iraqis. Strikes into Syria have been against ISIS.

I know it's habitual for some to make history up, but in this case everything is well documented. If the West really had a plan, it has not worked. They have been reactive and indecisive due to sensitivities of domestic public opinion. The West is just fed up wit being in the middle of Muslims who want to kill each other.

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 05:16 PM
I love how people try to say the US is just fed up qith Muslims or the middle east or some such nonsense...pft.

We love the conflict there. it is far away. It allows for the MIC to grow exponentially without any comment from the.public, etc. The US MIC will forever more require constant involvememt in military actions overseas. It needs the muslim fanatics to sustain itself.

Go sign up!

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 05:29 PM
i think syria is a trap for russia and another step to ww3.
it's all planned.

tptb aren't that stupid.

posted on Oct, 18 2015 @ 09:00 PM

originally posted by: nonjudgementalist
You didn't really expose anything you just have us your opinion

Wesley Clark did a better job of explaining the Middle East agenda than
i ever will in one handful of paragraphs. He didn't graduate at the top of
his class at West Point because he was uninformed...

Kudos to TheRisenPeople for this thread:

My opinion is, THEY hooked General Clark off the stage for just this blurb^.
edit on 18-10-2015 by derfreebie because: Opinions vary, just like truths.

posted on Oct, 19 2015 @ 01:59 AM
a reply to: Willtell

I don't think you have exposed all the plan.

Can't accept the idea that the USA and the West wanted Russia 'to get bogged down in Syria either.

NATO seems to be needed to police the EU's borders rather than bother about Syria itself because the Russians appear to be sincere in what they are doing and doing it speedily, efficiently and exceptionally well.

What I can accept is that Obama jumping to the strings being pulled to use American money has been told to get rid of Assad, under whom the country, whether people like it or not, was better run and united. If anyone wants to scream Syria was a wicked country persecuting people - I am sure we can pull up a number of other countries far worse.

We can also use the examples of USA led Western actions against countries where the leader has been deposed and murdered and now look at them today. Their actions have created nests for terrorists to thrive in because of the suffering and misery inflicted there.

But one of the reasons everyone seems to miss is the interest Israel has in obtaining more land, especially land it historically regards as its own - given by god twoddle etc. Also the fact that with all the internal conflict going on there ISIS hasn't stepped up to its borders and started attacking in unison to back the Muslins inside. One can only wonder why not take advantage anyone else in their position would?

This whole issue stinks to high heaven of pre-planned collaboration, intrigue and mindless misery inflicting - something some countries export as though it was worth gold to them - Ah I forgot yes it is for the bankers and arms manufacturers and allied industries.

posted on Oct, 19 2015 @ 06:30 AM
a reply to: Willtell

Plan is to destroy Syria


Did you guys forget about Iran

They didn't

posted on Oct, 19 2015 @ 08:00 AM
a reply to: ScrewGmail

Trump certainly didnt...

new topics

top topics

<<   2 >>

log in