It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pl3bscheese
I think his hit/miss ratio is greatly exaggerated, and definitions skewed after the fact to try and save face on screwups. He's still one of the best futurists we got, just not a freaking demigod like some would love to imagine him to be.
So I'm in alignment with this one. I think we'll have more nanobot prototypes through the next decade, and be integrating all the most successful variations to create new avenues for revolutionizing certain areas of medicine, military, gaming... hell just about everything. I will wait a cool 5 years after it's introduced to the public before jumping on board. Let the psychotic breaks, and sudden heart failures be someone else's loss. After they get things tweaked enough, it's time for transhumanism, baby!
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
I have to agree with you there.
We are a supply demand society, if there is no demand there will be no supply. Also we can look at the past advancements in technology and see that our society is in a kind of book burning phase where people fear progress and seek to limit what we as a society are able to do.
Monopoly of markets by international coompanies drive the markets and do not want a superhuman public. I think a super docile human is what the corporate markets are aiming for.
Also if we look at progress we havent done anything new since WW2 other than tablets which are just microsized TVs.
Technology has gotten smaller but there is a brick wall when it comes to our own evolution. In my opinion we are and have always been devolving. . . . .
originally posted by: pl3bscheese
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
I have to agree with you there.
Don't piggy back off my post to promote your own agenda, we are not in agreement.
We are a supply demand society, if there is no demand there will be no supply. Also we can look at the past advancements in technology and see that our society is in a kind of book burning phase where people fear progress and seek to limit what we as a society are able to do.
Disagree. There is no book burning, but there are ass backwards fools. As many extreme conservatives are equaled by radical progressives. I'm impartial in my perception, not focusing on the bit I fear. They've always existed, and always will. Let them stay behind.
Monopoly of markets by international coompanies drive the markets and do not want a superhuman public. I think a super docile human is what the corporate markets are aiming for.
I don't care. There's a market for this technology, and it will be made available for those who can afford it. I'm leveling up and up to upgrade and prep for space exploration later this century as Terra becomes an increasingly hostile terrain.
Also if we look at progress we havent done anything new since WW2 other than tablets which are just microsized TVs.
I've often heard this, but realize people are just propagating nonsense. It's not remotely true. We've progressed leaps and bounds since WW2. No, it's not all miniaturization and marketing.
Technology has gotten smaller but there is a brick wall when it comes to our own evolution. In my opinion we are and have always been devolving. . . . .
Then you don't understand what evolution is. Things change, it sounds like you're holding out for an ideal that never existed and never will.