It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chewi
a reply to: Vector99
Bush was trying to negotiate for UK to give it to them. Pinochet doubled crossed him 3 TIMES. No I don't have a source. look it up yourself as I already know the reality around the falklands. its you that don't even know the basics.
The new islands allow China to harness a portion of the sea for its own use that has been relatively out of reach until now. Although there are significant fisheries and possible large oil and gas reserves in the South China Sea, China’s efforts serve more to fortify its territorial claims than to help it extract natural resources, said Mira Rapp-Hooper, formerly the director of the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington research group.
Though too small to support large military units, the islands will enable sustained Chinese air and sea patrols of the area. The United States has reported spotting Chinese mobile artillery vehicles in the region, and the islands could allow China to exercise more control over fishing in the region.
originally posted by: chewi
a reply to: Vector99
The fact it is thousands of miles away from uk and Argentina had a cliam on it that UK just ignored and when gas and where found they took it all and went to war. Sorry it was classed as a conflict.
You are missing the point. China is MANUFACTURING NEW ISLANDS to lay claim to international waters, not by their border though, by EVERYONE else's borders in the South China Sea
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Vector99
You are missing the point. China is MANUFACTURING NEW ISLANDS to lay claim to international waters, not by their border though, by EVERYONE else's borders in the South China Sea
You really think all the Vietnamese, Thai, Malaysian or Philippine islands just fell into their hands and were not manufactured like the other half of the Netherlands?
Read the article, it's not that bad at all.
originally posted by: chewi
a reply to: Vector99
Then provide a source to back up your claim about it being free to whomever wants it. Was it just lying there for the british to steal in the 1600s
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
The new islands allow China to harness a portion of the sea for its own use that has been relatively out of reach until now. Although there are significant fisheries and possible large oil and gas reserves in the South China Sea, China’s efforts serve more to fortify its territorial claims than to help it extract natural resources, said Mira Rapp-Hooper, formerly the director of the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington research group.
Though too small to support large military units, the islands will enable sustained Chinese air and sea patrols of the area. The United States has reported spotting Chinese mobile artillery vehicles in the region, and the islands could allow China to exercise more control over fishing in the region.
nytimes
Plenty of those islands there!
The US (and their allies) could have a point if most of them would be occupied by the Chinese, which isn't the case. Taiwan and the Philippines operate similar airstrips on their islands in the region.
What the hell is it all about now? Sabre-rattling attention away from the Syriaous mess in the ME?
right off the coast
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Vector99
Distance between Hawaii and California: 2471 miles. Oh my ...
I guess a 12 mile-zone surrounding Hawaii is not mandatory for Chinese warships either? Yeah, I know. That was rather devilish as you don't recognize islands as islands when they were atolls in their short youth.
Mental acrobatics, short from going mental. I love a good Idiocracy!