I am surprised there are not more intelligent questions before any answers are even considered. Opinions are free, intelligent research takes time, a
course of critical discernment and facts and evidence.
This video, coming on the tail of the photo/s of the city sized ship over the river area a week or two ago from China is interesting. That event is
easy to classify as a Photoshop composite and an easy proof when you layer the frame from the film over the photo. As someone who does compositing and
such photographic work professionally it was easy to see as fake, and I immediately dismissed it. But now it looks like it could be related. At least
as a pre-diversion and planned buffer for this event.
Firstly, I do not see how this is a mirage. The fact they use an obscure term in their news broadcasts for the optical effect "Fata Morgana." or
"autumnal optical illusion." to impress the public with a technical term to fool the largest segment of the uneducated public, and smacks of
controlled news agencies getting their "language" from "other" sources they then add their by-line. Those of us working in media know all the news is
controlled from dark undisclosed sources. Especially for the obvious UFO/Alien subjects, but then all the other news is also homogenized and altered
to control the opinions and sustain the public awareness to manageable levels. So there is that.
Yet, in the visual data there are some interesting facts that bear research. Please do not assume because it is termed as "Swamp Gas" by the media and
assumed experts that it is so easily classified as such.
Anyone who does visual work in illustration, 3D modeling and even knows holographic tech can see this is not a simple event to easily dismiss. There
are aspects of the video that need be broken down. Here is my own personal list of aspects worth investigation or facts to know or confirm before any
intelligent opinion can even be considered.
Confirm source, location and any details on persons and camera technology used. Their reason for being there and why they had a video camera. Might
just be a phone, but how long was the effect visible before they decided to record it? Many people whom experience unusual phenomena think about a
phone or not some time after the shock of experiencing their event. I myself, a camera person and photographer have made the mistake of not pulling
out whatever tech I have for such. It takes practice and expert response to be ready for such. So, who took the video, with what and how soon after
seeing the phenomena. What processing if any, or reduction of image, and original format and size. I don't expect this data, but it bears
consideration in any investigation.
WEATHER, TIME, LOCATION:
What were the weather conditions at the time? (was the camera exif data set or incorrect?) All this information is in the original video for time to
corroborate conditions and and then if location is accurate can be researched for detail from other public sources like cloud cover, altitude and
temperature, humidity etc.
Who else saw this, and what statements were recorded if any? Other photos or video? Usually if someone pulls out a camera in a crowd, everyone else
will too. Were there others around when they recorded this? If so, where is all that possible data?
Bluebeam and other such secret and as yet unconfirmed dark government and super secret technologies could be involved, but that some have said they
could be testing the holographic technologies on areas without modern phone tech, like the Nigerian village whom also said they saw a city in the
clouds but had no recording technologies is not valid here, as it is now known there are more smartphones in China than the United States.
Also in the "CARET"
event in California in 2007 it was mentioned that
the "government" had high quality holographic projection tech they could use for false flag or other nefarious projects aimed at public populations.
But this is also mentioned many other places and times over the last decade or two if not earlier. So if that, why? Testing? By who?
Besides all these unanswered questions there are some observable and very interesting visual data to discuss. One glaring omission was a view of the
"city" on the ground that was miraged. Where is that?
We can go to Google Earth to see the area for any similar collection of structures or city blocks of highrises, but we don't know the exact location
of the camera and what direction the cloud city was observed to do any optical physics to even consider it was any optical illusion. If I had the time
I would ask an expert in optical science like Bruce Maccabee
. But I would suspect that the distinct lack of site and
event data as I listed would make for only a guess from Bruce. He might however tell us such a natural occurrence would be unlikely knowing the
What I found interesting about the video was that the city was in a seemingly correct perspective from the cameras perspective. In other words, if the
city (by the looks of it several big city blocks, or a sizable portion of any big city downtown high rise area), if on the side of a mountain many
thousand feet high, this is the perspective we would expect. How is that possible unless projected with set perspective from or near where the camera
The perspective alone is quite accurate to a real placement. Was this seen by another camera near by we could then show perspective corroborating?
Very curious this.
If then it WAS there, and a dimensional bleed-through why there? Is CERN on some refractive line to this geographic? Or, as is also stated in many
articles we are moving into a dimensional shift, due to vibrational splitting of time space was this spontaneous shift seen. Then if that it would be
logical to assume it could show up at other locations as well. Nothing there yet.
This did not look like a "future" city as some suggested. All were standard right-angled buildings of conventional design as far as I observed. But
this was a significantly sized area of very tall but standard structures.
So these and other questions and observations have yet to solve this for me, and the prosaic explanations of a mirage or "Fata Morgana." is laughable,
but typical of the low intelligent easy answer commonly foisted on the public. Of course they know that the intelligent people who know better than to
believe their crap-news is in such low numbers that their significance is less than negligible. They play the masses, and the exceptions are
acceptable percentages to cover any dangers of damaging the integrity of the information news agencies distributing the misdirection and
misinformation. And they know that if needed, the smart vocal individuals that are a danger to their lies can in many cases be dealt with by darker
I will myself see what I find in observing the geography of the camera's general location, and will post any interesting or relevant evidence for or
against the current ideas on this event.
edit on 10/21/2015 by ZeroGhost because: (no reason given)