It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
If you meant to say that nobody has mentioned it other than you, you would be correct. As to why you felt the need to bring up something that is by your own admission completely irrelevant, I can't answer for you.
Why is it a fail? Well, sort of the very definition of apples and oranges isn't it? On the one hand you have people taking land from other people who took land from other people who probably took it from other people. On the other hand you have people moving from one recognized country to another recognized country, legally or illegally is immaterial.
Though I doubt any of that matters, as your repeated references to "white americans" is pretty indicative of your bias and agenda.
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Prezbo369
You didnt read th e post correct huh? i said th e indians were not there first. National gepgraphic had th e article at one time. There were also remains with native american arrowheads leading to believe they were murdered. In effect they stole the land from another tribe.
And I have to say, considering the news, in UK and Europe, with sharia based policing of whole areas, and people not even safe or able to comfortably go out at night, I don't disapprove of her rant in the least, though really glad she didn't get physical.
Disabled > Wheelchairs > Elderly > People with baby carriages > Everyone else.
One thing I do not agree with, is that it was "racist".