France's top weatherman sparks storm over book questioning climate change

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Ah OK thanks for the detailed reply!

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Ya when they call anyone a denier, imo they are talking about the denial of agw because natural change is obvious. And if you are basing it on ats then how can you call that the majority of the agw crowd?

Yes there is outside sources, doesn't change that CO2 is a cause as well.

originally posted by: Sremmos80

Seriously, want to talk about people failing to differentiate, your stance seems to be since it has warmed up before humans can't possibly have any hand in it.

No...read again my argument, that's one of the reasons, but the fact that other changes have been happening, and are still happening on Earth that can change the climate, plus the fact that water vapor is more important than CO2 as a ghg and humans don't have any significant influence on it. Not to mention the fact that the warming began in the early 1600s. The warmer the atmosphere gets, the more water vapor it can hold, which makes it warmer, hence causing a feedback effect that has been wrongly attributed to CO2. It is obvious that mankind is not the cause of climate change.