Democrats Are Godless Heathen Tyrant Maniacs Because That’s What Voters Want

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Lets just pick someone with leadership skills, morality, fairness, ethics, values.

Does anyone come close? Other than Batman?

Actually LOL, on the Republican side, I would give Kassich the nod, on the Dem side, I think Bernie is too old, he has a great message, but would give my nod to O'Malley.

a reply to: BubbaJoe

I won't even think about voting until before the election. Given the choices, I might just go fishing. Or bowling.

originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
It sounds pretty awesome when you put it like that.

Only if you promise to dress up as one of those green women.

a reply to: Metallicus
A couple of weeks ago you said you could vote for Bernie didn't you?

Look at the Joke that is the Republican lineup, what a bunch of worn people of the past.

I'll support the first candidate that makes less than me.

originally posted by: BubbaJoe


Please provide a source for such great information.

Of course.

Thirty thousand people, nine percent of the Icelandic population, are below the poverty line, while 13 percent are at risk according to a new report from the Red Cross, ruv.is reports.

According to the report, the largest group on welfare are young people, young men in particular. A total of 3,000 young people receive financial support from the municipalities.

Unemployment is highest among 18-24 years-olds, or 7.7 percent compared to the average unemployment rate in the country, which currently stands at 4.5 percent.

Thirty Thousand Below Poverty Line in Iceland

The world’s richest country is Norway. The population of Norway is 4.5 million people. Despite the wealth of the country due to oil commodities, poverty still exists. In the capital of Oslo, 8.3 percent of the population suffers from poverty. The populations that are affected the most by poverty are immigrants, families with children and single parents, and those who are on social security.

As of 2014, child poverty is on the rise in Norway. It is estimated that 78,000 children are suffering at this time. Three point four percent of children are living in a state of ‘relative’ poverty. In Norway, it is defined as households with income below 50 per cent of the national median.

A Look at Poverty in Norway

Social Democracy works !!

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

That's the thing there Z.

Millions of American middle class,government employees, and unions have their pensions invested in WALL STREET.

Every tax.

Every regulation takes money out of their pockets, and INCREASES the need for social programs that can't fund themselves.

He will raise taxes like Obama has.

He will create new taxes like the medicare capital gains surtax.

He will create/increase taxes like the 'Alterantive minimum tax' to make sure them evil rich people PAY their fair share.

But your right.

Like Europe them evil rich people and business will simply expatriate.

Then the tax burden falls on the middle class.

Only they have no 401s, and IRA's left, and they won't have no jobs either.

Because they will have been outsourced to Canada, and Mexico, and China.

Sanders has delusions of grandeur that is only going to increase that 'income inequality.

originally posted by: Isurrender73
a reply to: xuenchen

Historically no system has succeeded for more than a few hundred years. What is your point?

Well CAPITALISM has been around since man has been calling himself civilized.

For the record that is MORE than a 'few hundred' years.

a reply to: xuenchen

This has nothing to do with Socialism. This has much nore to do with technology replacing jobs, more money going to the 1%, and no money or jobs left for the unemployed.

And debt/usury based private banking.

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
The proof is in the pudding, when ever ats right wing watch dogs fill your thread with commie this and look at that commie, you Know its working.

For good reason.

Class conflict one comes from one place.

Class conflict, frequently referred to as class warfare or class struggle, is the tension or antagonism which exists in society due to competing socioeconomic interests and desires between people of different classes. The view that the class struggle provides the lever for radical social change for the majority is central to the work of Karl Marx and the anarchist Mikhail Bakunin. However, the discovery of the existence of class struggle is not the product of their theories; their theories can instead be seen as a response to the existence of class struggles.[citation needed]

en.wikipedia.org...

Of course it's called the Bourgeois and the Proletarians in the CM.

en.wikipedia.org...

The LEFT needs to own up to where their ideology comes from.

And least Sanders is honest about it.

DP

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Isurrender73
a reply to: xuenchen

Historically no system has succeeded for more than a few hundred years. What is your point?

Well CAPITALISM has been around since man has been calling himself civilized.

For the record that is MORE than a 'few hundred' years.

Socialism has been around since the very first society of humans exisisted. Some hunted, some gathered, some took care of children, no money yet all people shared the commodities.

Your point?

a reply to: neo96

There all crooks, no need to add big propaganda words to pretend your side is better. Propaganda 101 its pretty simple.

originally posted by: Isurrender73

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Isurrender73

LOL , Spoken like a True Anarchist ....

I prefer Revolutionary or Mutineer, but I will wear whatever label you like.

Yeah a revolutionary, and mutineer doesn't hide behind government, and politicians.

They want something they do it one their own.

Instead of voting by proxy for someone to give them things they can't EARN on their own.

a reply to: neo96

Class warfare has happened plenty of times before Marx or Bakunin - there are numerous peasant/slave/class revolts through-out recorded history, predating the mentioned authors by thousands of years.

originally posted by: Metallicus
First let me say that I was delighted to see a Democrat like Jim Webb in last night's Democratic debate. I think if he were to be the Democratic candidate I could vote for him depending on who was on the other side of the aisle.

However, the other candidates were absolutely loony toons crazy. I couldn't believe the blatant attacks on Capitalism and America.

Now, don't get me wrong. I think that there is plenty wrong with America, but I also don't believe that the fundamental system is broken. Anyway, it is scary how mainstream these folks are becoming. They are a threat to the very fabric of the country I love.

So do you agree with the article premise? Are THESE the politicians we deserve?

I hope not.

It’s comforting to project all our anger onto politicians. Lord knows, they deserve a fair amount of it. However, the difficult reality is this: America’s biggest problem is its citizens, not its politicians. Indeed, its politicians are a symptom, a reflection, of its people. They may manipulate and coerce and propagandize, but when it comes down to it, in a democratic system, if a bunch of lunatics and scoundrels are in power it’s because the people chose to put them there. The sickness originates, then, with the people. And the people’s sickness is rooted in the soul.

My mind kept going back to this fact last night as I watched the Democrat debate on CNN. To be honest, I’m not totally sure why I watched it. Clearly, a person must have some serious psychological issues if they elect to spend an evening with Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. It’s like choosing to be mentally water boarded for two and a half hours. Only a troubled man would willingly subject himself to such torment. I’ll be making an appointment with a therapist later today.

and more

With the frazzled Muppet from Vermont leading the way, all of the candidates (except Jim Webb, who apparently stumbled into the wrong debate) spent the first several minutes complaining about “income inequality.” This was a theme they’d all return to incessantly throughout the evening, because there’s nothing more exhilarating than listening to old rich white people complain about old rich white people. Bernie Sanders lamented again and again that the “middle class is collapsing,” but never expressed any interest in seeing us poor middle class folk move up and out of the middle class. For Sanders and the rest of them, the “middle class” should be all we peons aspire to. Success and wealth ought to be solely possessed by the left wing ruling class. Wealth is evil, you see, so that’s why we should let our great and generous protectors carry the burden.

Middle Class! Inequality! Greed! Middle Class! Inequality! Greed! I can’t really blame them for shouting socialist catchwords all night. This is what their voters desire. They don’t desire capitalism, because capitalism means opportunity and freedom, and opportunity and freedom mean hard work. Economic freedom is so unpopular among liberals that Bernie Sanders openly disavowed it to the sound of roaring applause. Clinton was hesitant (for now) to fully label herself a socialist, so instead she said she’s a sorta-capitalist who thinks “capitalism has to be saved from itself.” This is another way of calling American people children who need to be rescued by benevolent bureaucrats, but that’s OK because Democrat voters fervently wish to be treated like children. They want their own failures and struggles in life to be the fault of “the rich” and they want a president who will magically make it better.

It’s a bit awkward, of course, because they already voted for a guy who promised to do just that, yet the “income inequality” has only gotten worse. This, as Hillary asserted several times, is still the fault of the Republicans. Even when we had a Democrat president and a Democrat Congress, all of our economic woes could be laid at the feet of Republicans and “the rich.” But not every “the rich.” Just “the rich” who aren’t Democrat politicians, or Democrat donors like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase, or union leaders, or Planned Parenthood executives, or Hollywood liberals, or university administrators, or any other group comprised mainly of wealthy left wingers.

Source

Wow, look how fast the obamabots responded, and how their consortium quickly star each others post.
They are not kidding us who recognize their nefarious acts.
On the other, I still believe the elections are rigged and Hitlery will be the next POTUS. Bernie Boy confirmed this for me when he made his ridicules blather on "The American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails." Speak for yourself bernieboy.

originally posted by: Isurrender73

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Isurrender73
a reply to: xuenchen

Historically no system has succeeded for more than a few hundred years. What is your point?

Well CAPITALISM has been around since man has been calling himself civilized.

For the record that is MORE than a 'few hundred' years.

Socialism has been around since the very first society of humans exisisted. Some hunted, some gathered, some took care of children, no money yet all people shared the commodities.

Your point?

Uh no.

That wasn't socialism.

Of course that was the days when the men folk went out and hunted, and the women were kept home barefoot, and pregnant.

That's 'socialism' ???

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Isurrender73

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Isurrender73

LOL , Spoken like a True Anarchist ....

I prefer Revolutionary or Mutineer, but I will wear whatever label you like.

Yeah a revolutionary, and mutineer doesn't hide behind government, and politicians.

They want something they do it one their own.

Instead of voting by proxy for someone to give them things they can't EARN on their own.

Our founding fathers were Revolutionaries and Mutineers, and they were so because they wanted to establish a new form of government. They were not seeking anarchy, they were seeking freedom from a corrupt financial system and corrupt government.

I am seeking a new matrix as well, for precisely the same reason.

a reply to: Isurrender73

Our founding fathers were a bunch of rich old white guys.

Ya know the evil one percenters.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Isurrender73

Our founding fathers were a bunch of rich old white guys.

Ya know the evil one percenters.

I don't believe all the 1%ers are evil. Just 99% of them.


Actually I believe many wealthy people wouldn't mind sacrificing some wealth to establish a new more proportionate system of government. Some wealthy people simply played by the rules and became wealthy.

Donald Trump knows the rules don't make since. But why would that stop him from playing by the rules and becoming wealthy? He is part of the 1% I think would give up part if his wealth if he truly believed he was doing something revolutionary.