Clinton/Sanders for President

Clinton can't be Bernie's Vice President because he'll end up like Vince Foster.

President Trump. It is coming. Don't worry either, he is a moderate with some liberal leanings. Best thing he is a leader. Congress controls the politics anyway.

originally posted by: HUMBLEONE
Clinton can't be Bernie's Vice President because he'll end up like Vince Foster.

She would never accept VP anyway.

Bernie was on the Committee on Veterans' Affairs during the time of all the problems at the VA.

He is one of the people i hold responsible for the problems.

The democrats have never really done much for veterans and while they talk like they support veterans they never really do anything meaningful.
townhall.com...
www.thefederalistpapers.org...
abcnews.go.com...
dailycaller.com...

Many veterans see the BS coming from the democrats for what it is and vote for the GOP.
www.washingtonpost.com...

After vietnam and the way veterans were treated by the democrats i have never voted for them since.

originally posted by: dreamfox1
Shes has too much dirt on her to even be able to win so its a no chance

that would require the kind of sustained media drum beat that you only see when they are trying to destroy Republicans. We won't see that.

At 3:30 particularly: his message was awesome.



Should make sHillary shatner her pants.

Hell, even Foxnews this morning is claiming Hillary walked away with the debate. She is a vile, evil, lying, manipulative person with no respect for any position she has had, nor the lives of the people she affects. The sooner the clinton family and the bush family just drop off the radar, the better the world will be.

Neither would accept the VP slot.

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Kratos40

Maybe if HIll-Dawg was on the VP ticket instead of Sanders.

I could get behind this too, but can you EVER imagine Hillary taking second fiddle?

originally posted by: madmac5150
If I were a Democrat, I would be upset...

Only 2 real idiots to choose from...

The GOP has variety!!

Variety as in a who can be a more racist, intolerant asshole? Because that's all I see coming from the right. A bunch of jackasses trying to one up each other with how intolerant they can be.

originally posted by: qwerty12345
a reply to: rockintitz

From selling coc aine when her husband was having it flown in through Mensa, Arkansas.

Wow going way back. Boys on the tracks anyone. As I understand that's the time frame the Bush and Clinton families became so close. Very tight to this day. Blast from the past.

a reply to: WP4YT

Cory Booker. He would be my guess.

originally posted by: qwerty12345
a reply to: rockintitz

From selling coc aine when her husband was having it flown in through Mensa, Arkansas.

And remember that Bush Sr. was the mastermind behind Mena.

The two parties are infected by the same global mafia stink.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Hell, she took something like 32nd fiddle by being Secretary of State...she's a chronic politician at this point. I can't see her being able to quit cold turkey if she doesn't get the democrats' nod.

But, I've been wrong before...once...but it wasn't my fault!

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Hell, she took something like 32nd fiddle by being Secretary of State...she's a chronic politician at this point. I can't see her being able to quit cold turkey if she doesn't get the democrats' nod.

But, I've been wrong before...once...but it wasn't my fault!

My biggest hope is to see Sanders and trump continue to throw bombs into the status quo before reality hits and everyone sees in the end you get Clinton or Bush. Only two corrupt and connected enough to do it.

a reply to: Reallyfolks

Bush has lost nearly all of his support.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Reallyfolks

Bush has lost nearly all of his support.

In the end he and Clinton will be the last two standing. Not happy at all about it, but it will happen. Then everyone will go into the lesser of two evils mode and one or the other will take the prize. Too much money, too many connections, too much corruption with Clinton and Bush to happen any other way.

I'd like to think that we could elect Mao and have Stalin and Hitler in the political cabinet and it wouldn't matter because the American people would just ignore the socialist/communist/totalitarian state they would bring. But these are the same Americans who eat too much, watch tv and believe everything they see in the media.

a reply to: Reallyfolks

I'm not just talking about the public's support here.

This was back at the end of August.
Top Jeb fundraisers leave campaign amid troubling signs

This was at the end of September.
Donors warn Jeb Bush: You’ve got a month to turn your polling around before we start bailing

If you still think that Bush is the top Republican contender, maybe because he is the most moderate, you are out-of-date with your political news.

a reply to: Kratos40

I'm not so sure it was as good a night for Hillary as some would have us believe.

While she may have won the contest for "show," when it came to substance, she took way more hits than she dished out and some of her lesser known positions were brought to light.

Things like her opposition to reinstatement of the Glass Steagall Act, (IMO, the repeal of Glass Steagall under Bill Clunton was the single largest factor that led to the 2008 economic collapse)

Or, her proposal to institute a "no-fly" zone over Syria while the Russians are flying sorties and launching cruise missiles. (Which sounds like the perfect recipe for accidental confrontation and/or escalation)

Or, her reversal of opinion with respect to the Trans-Pacific Trade Pact when it became politically expedient to do so.

Come to think of it, NAFTA was another huge factor in the lead up to our economic collapse and dear ole Bill signed that one into law as well. Not to mention his awarding China with America's Permanent Most Favored Trading Status, which pretty much escorted American manufacturing jobs right out the door.

It's like she's still stuck in her "defend my husband mode" that she maintained while he lied under oath.

On top of all that, a pattern of having to apologize and admit mistakes in past judgments, (like her support of the Iraq war, or her decision to utilize a private email server) is beginning to emerge and become more evident. (I wonder if I could look forward to another "judgement apology" when her no-fly zone gets us into a war with Russia)

Brings back memories of her "Brian Williams moment in the 2008 election, when she claimed to have come under enemy fire while traveling abroad.

Hell, Brian Williams was pretty much declared unfit to even present the nightly news for his judgement lapse and I'm supposed to support a candidate for POTUS who has a track record of repeated bad judgement calls?

I gotta tell you, that's not what I'm looking for in a President.

IMO, the "Dream Ticket" would be Bernie Sanders & Elizabeth Warren.