It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
originally posted by: romilo
I keep wondering how come westerns whom have interest in Syria could not do anything else in the beginning of the conflict than join in with what they want to call rebels and provide em with means to destroy the country.. It also do not make much sense at all that tens of thousands? of Syrian citizen of 20+ million of ppl in the country, would keep their own country as hostages and make it weaker for years, inviting all kinda of mercs inside the country around the world.. It also opened gates for this very suspicious faction they keep calling ISISL/Daesh etc.
Somehow it is quite obvious what is steam rolling in ME, it seem to be the very same tactics that is used in Syria, shaping the leadership of the regime, its like when they got their ways, they made "trading deals" for those areas rich resources etc, so those areas will be secured and managed "accordingly" but same time its says also that Frag that country and its ppl..
It's not Daesh, don't say Daesh, never say Daesh. It's ISIS, ISIS, ISIS. It will be ISIS forever. They made their ficticious bed let them lie in it and let ISIS forever roam in search for Osiris $&!@* . You acknowledge Daesh than you are letting them get away with rewriting their blunder.
Ain't no f'n way a Muslim religious rebel group would name themselves after a Eygyptian mythology.
That was a rant right?
originally posted by: ZakOlongapo
a reply to: InnerPeace2012
i do almost agree with You...
just please, can You to explain why are You saying this:
-Everyone knows that Assad must go (why? most of Syrian people elected him, right?)
-Each should pay for their crimes against humanity, not just Assad (why Assad? what exactly he did? against humanity)
thanks (edit)
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
originally posted by: romilo
I keep wondering how come westerns whom have interest in Syria could not do anything else in the beginning of the conflict than join in with what they want to call rebels and provide em with means to destroy the country.. It also do not make much sense at all that tens of thousands? of Syrian citizen of 20+ million of ppl in the country, would keep their own country as hostages and make it weaker for years, inviting all kinda of mercs inside the country around the world.. It also opened gates for this very suspicious faction they keep calling ISISL/Daesh etc.
Somehow it is quite obvious what is steam rolling in ME, it seem to be the very same tactics that is used in Syria, shaping the leadership of the regime, its like when they got their ways, they made "trading deals" for those areas rich resources etc, so those areas will be secured and managed "accordingly" but same time its says also that Frag that country and its ppl..
It's not Daesh, don't say Daesh, never say Daesh. It's ISIS, ISIS, ISIS. It will be ISIS forever. They made their ficticious bed let them lie in it and let ISIS forever roam in search for Osiris $&!@* . You acknowledge Daesh than you are letting them get away with rewriting their blunder.
Ain't no f'n way a Muslim religious rebel group would name themselves after a Eygyptian mythology.
That was a rant right?
Yes, but only because I love it in its asinine splendor. Everything about ISIS is counter to real life, yet parralels the movie screen. Funny that.