Former George Bush Chief Economist Says 911 Was An Inside Job

a reply to: wildb

Thank you for your opinion..

It is not a matter of an opinion, it is a matter of fact.

a reply to: Salander

Just pointing out the facts.

As you probably saw in the video as demolition teams prepared a building for demolition at ground level, requires a lot of work weakening the steel structure with torches before explosives are even installed. And, as you have seen, explosive evidence in that video remained within the rubble and was easily spotted.

It took many months just to prepare a bridge in Corpus Christi, Texas for explosive demolition even at ground level, so what makes 9/11 conspiracy theorist think that preparing the WTC buildings for demolition with explosives at the exact impact locations was completed within a weekend? Not to mention there were no secondary explosives observed nor heard as those aircraft slammed into the WTC buildings. Add to the fact that the WTC Towers collapsed at the impact points and nowhere else and since the impacts were violent enough to dislodge fire protection from the steel columns, what makes 9/11 conspiracy theorist think that explosives would have remained firmly attached to the steel columns? If explosives are not firmly attached to steel columns when detonated, they will not be effective.

It would have taken almost a year to prepare each of those buildings for explosive demolition and it would all have had to be done in total secret in those crowded buildings despite the hazardous, dusty, and noisy environmental conditions and tons of waste debris that would have been produced during the demolition preparation process.

To think that anyone can walk into a steel frame building and plant explosives in a weekend in order to bring down the WTC buildings is the stuff of Hollywood movies and not indicative of the way things are done in the real world of explosive demolition.

a reply to: skyeagle409

They did not prep the towers in a weekend, as you claim. At least months. The weekend before they merely ARMED the system.

In the previous months, all sorts of "construction projects" were carried out.

I thought we were attacked because some American reporter almost slept with Bin Laden (for information) until she saw the size of his tiny wiener and walked away laughing. So much for that one I guess.

Anyways...If Bush had anything whatsoever to do with 9/11, even remotely, it would have been far more than a conspiracy theory.

a reply to: Salander

They did not prep the towers in a weekend, as you claim. At least months. The weekend before they merely ARMED the system.

In the previous months, all sorts of "construction projects" were carried out.

You are making this up.
No demo crew would leave explosives wired and attached for months.
No evidence of explosives or detonation devices were found by the people searching the debris for fingers and eyeballs.

a reply to: samkent

I am able to read between the lines and connect the dots. Apparently you are not.

Peace bro.

No evidence of explosives or detonation devices were found by the people searching the debris for fingers and eyeballs.

You guys love to say that, however they were not looked for, you can't find something if you don't look for it can you..

Anyways...If Bush had anything whatsoever to do with 9/11, even remotely, it would have been far more than a conspiracy theory.

Bush had nothing to do with 911, at least I don't think so, think outside the box.

a reply to: wildb

IMO the Bush Family was very much involved in facilitating the events of the day, Stratasec/Securacom and the entire relationship with bin Laden family and the role of Saudi in the events.

But I suspect Dubya himself was not, simply for purposes of plausible deniability.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: wildb

IMO the Bush Family was very much involved in facilitating the events of the day, Stratasec/Securacom and the entire relationship with bin Laden family and the role of Saudi in the events.

But I suspect Dubya himself was not, simply for purposes of plausible deniability.

Right, he had to stay clean..

a reply to: Salander

IMO the Bush Family was very much involved in facilitating the events of the day, Stratasec/Securacom and the entire relationship with bin Laden family and the role of Saudi in the events.

And just what did he get out of it?
You don't stick your neck out for mass murder for no gain.

Plus Yew York still had the death penalty back then.
So anyone involved could and would be extradited to NY to be tried for mass murder and a date with the needle.

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Salander

IMO the Bush Family was very much involved in facilitating the events of the day, Stratasec/Securacom and the entire relationship with bin Laden family and the role of Saudi in the events.

And just what did he get out of it?
You don't stick your neck out for mass murder for no gain.

Plus Yew York still had the death penalty back then.
So anyone involved could and would be extradited to NY to be tried for mass murder and a date with the needle.

Business relationships are usually complex and private. I was not involved in any dealings between Bush and bin Ladens, but they existed and are documented. Carlyle Group and others. Bush bin Laden, and other cute nick names amongst them.

a reply to: Salander

Business relationships are usually complex and private.

Don't trivialize it.
You are saying it was a conspiracy to commit mass murder by our president.

There is no way to be pardoned out of extradition and trial like Nixon.

After 14 years no one has ever shown any proof of the things you are suggesting.
You are speculating.
You are making things up.
You are trying to connect dots that don't exist.

a reply to: Salander

They did not prep the towers in a weekend, as you claim.

There were 9/11 conspiracy theorist who made that claim, not me.

The weekend before they merely ARMED the system.

If you knew anything about explosives and explosive demolitions of steel frame buildings, you have known that would have been impossible. Add to the fact that lack of secondary explosions as the aircraft struck the WTC buildings underlines the fact there were no explosives planted in the WTC buildings, and of course, no demolition hardware was ever found within the rubble of the WTC buildings.

a reply to: Salander

IMO the Bush Family was very much involved in facilitating the events of the day, Stratasec/Securacom and the entire relationship with bin Laden family and the role of Saudi in the events.

Just to let you know that relatives of Osama bin Laden have disowned him.

a reply to: nwtrucker

Two factions that share power but one agenda. Period.

a reply to: skyeagle409

So why was thermite still burning in the rubble months after 9/11, again? Hot spots in excess of 1100°.
Nice attempt at disinformation, though.