It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former George Bush Chief Economist Says 911 Was An Inside Job

page: 10
55
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 05:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Salander



After collecting and analyzing their data, Cahill said the air around there was like that coming out of an industrial exhaust stack, as though an incinerator were at work. There were microparticles of iron, and that can happen only when iron is boiling.


You can produce your own micro-particles as well. All you need is a lighter and steel wool, or, you can place two 3-foot steel beams in a barrel of wood and light the wood with a match. After the fire burns itself out, you can collect the same micro-particles from the barrel.

I might add that stored iron can generate temperatures high enough to start fires. Do you know the process that I am talking about?




posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 05:18 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409


You know, and I know, that what you have just posted is not true at all.


You and I know it is true, it is your job to deny the truth as you have demonstrated.


After all, I posted references that proved my point that "AE911 Truth" lies on a regular basis.


That is a lie. You have never proved A&E lied, and you have been challenged many times by many ATS posters including me to prove A&E science is wrong with real science.

You never have.


I even posted references where even hardcore truthers slammed AE911 Truth for lying and look what you posted! Even "Veterans Today" has slammed "AE911 Truth".


No one has slammed A&E but you.

BTW Veterans Today, is nothing more than a National Inquire rag.



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 05:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



No one has slammed A&E but you.


That won't fly because anyone can go back and access the references I posted to listen and read, how hardcore truthers accuse Richard Gage and "AE911 Truth" for lying.

Perhaps, your memory is a bit too short, so let me help you out.











Debunked: AE911Truth's WTC7 Explosive Demolition Hypothesis

www.metabunk.org...





edit on 13-10-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 05:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



You are the only ATS poster screaming A&E lied, A&E lied, A&E lied, A&E


Let's see if you are telling the truth that I am the only person that says "AE911 Truth" lies.



Exposing AE911Truth Lies 3

Okay, it’s time to call AE911Truth on their lies again.

truthersaresanitychallenged.wordpress.com...


I guess you were not telling the truth.



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

LOL I don't have to prove anything to someone who refuses to look.

Those silly videos prove nothing.

I will leave it up to all the causal ATS readers to make up there own minds.

You are so desperate to prove A&E science is wrong but you cant.

You can post all the silly hear say videos against A&E all you want, however that does not debunk their science now, does it?



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409



Exposing AE911Truth Lies 3

Okay, it’s time to call AE911Truth on their lies again.

truthersaresanitychallenged.wordpress.com...


Yellow Journalism!



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 06:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



Those silly videos prove nothing.


Silly to you because Richard Gage has been proven a liar with facts and evidence.
edit on 13-10-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 07:05 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409


Silly to you because Richard Gage has been proven a liar with facts and evidence.


The only lies against Richard Gage are proven propaganda, and disinformation that the OS die hart supporters have created on the internet to discredit A&E and their science that you sadly cannot debunk.



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 07:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



The only lies against Richard Gage are proven propaganda


You know that what you have just said is not true.



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 07:15 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409


You know that what you have just said is not true.


It's a proven fact!



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 07:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



It's a proven fact!


Of course it is a proven fact that Richard Gage lies. I never doubted it. Now, tell us what Morgan Reynolds says about the 9/11 aircraft in regard to WTC 1 and WTC 2.
edit on 13-10-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 07:23 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409


Of course it is a proven fact that Richard Gage lies.


Richard Gage is not a lair. However you have proven yourself as a lair. You have no credibility here.



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 07:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



Richard Gage is not a lair.


This hardcore truther will disagree with you.


edit on 13-10-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

Your silly video proves nothing.

The person filming Gage ambushes Gage while they are packing up to leave.

There is no evidence that Gage told a lie.

The video is BS.

I interesting that you don't give a source for your lame video either.
edit on 13-10-2015 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 08:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

In other words you have nothing that refutes my claim. Richard Gage is in the same sinking boat as Morgan Reynolds.



There is no evidence that Gage told a lie.


Apparently, that is not true at all. Let's take another look at Richard Gage.

edit on 13-10-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 08:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

In case you didn't notice, that is a 9/11 truther who is slamming Richard Gage.



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

I am NOT going to watch any video you post until you put a source to where it comes from.

Your silly video proves nothing. No credible sources! Nothing....



posted on Oct, 14 2015 @ 12:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: Thejaybird



You do realize that bin Laden was NEVER wanted by the F.B.I. for any involvement whatsoever in the 9/11 attacks, even though he was number one on their "Most Wanted" list?

Why? Zero evidence to tie him to the attack.


Apparently, you have missed out on the rest of the story. This is what you will read on the website of the FBI.



FBI Website: Most Wanted Terrorist Dead
Bin Laden Killed in ‘Targeted Operation’

The mastermind of the attacks on September 11, 2001 that killed thousands of innocent men, women, and children has been killed...Intelligence agencies quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by bin Laden’s terrorist organization, and in October 2001, his name was added to the U.S. Department of State’s Most Wanted Terrorists List.

www.fbi.gov...


Now, let's go here.



Bin Laden Admits 9/11 Responsibility, Warns of More Attacks

A tape aired by Al-Jazeera television Friday showed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden admitting for the first time that he orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and saying the United States could face more.


Bin Laden Claims Responsibility for 9/11

Usama bin Laden (search ) made his first televised appearance in more than a year Friday in which he admitted for the first time ordering the Sept. 11 attacks and accused President Bush of "misleading" the American people.

Injecting himself into the campaign four days ahead of the presidential election, bin Laden said the United States can avoid another Sept. 11-style attack if it stops threatening the security of Muslims.

www.foxnews.com...


Al-Qaeda: Declarations & Acts of War

The First Fatwa

In August of 1996, Osama bin Laden issued his first fatwa, a 30-page polemic entitled "Declaration of War Against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places," against the United States and Israel, and it was published in a London newspaper called Al Quds al Arabi.

The Second Fatwa

The second fatwa was published on February 23, 1998, in Al Quds al Arabi. Unlike the first fatwa, which was issued by Osama bin Laden alone, this fatwa was signed by Osama bin Laden; Ayman al-Zawahiri, leader of Jihad group in Egypt and al Qaeda second-in-command; Abu-Yasir Rafa'l Ahmad Taha, leader of the Islamic Group; Sheikh Mir Hamzah, secretary of the Jumiat-ut-Ulema-e-Pakistan; and Fazlul Rahman, leader of the Jihad Movement in Bangladesh.

The fatwa reasons that "three facts that are known to everyone" compel war against the United States. First, the United States has been "occupying the lands of Islam in the holiest of places." Second, the "crusader-Zionist alliance" has inflicted great devastation upon the Iraqi people. Third, the United States' goal is "to serve the Jews' petty state and divert attention from its occupation of Jerusalem and murder of Muslims there.

www.heritage.org...


BRITAIN

BRITAIN, WARNING #1: Al-Qaeda is planning to use aircraft in "unconventional ways", "possibly as flying bombs"

the British intelligence agency, gives a secret report to liaison staff at the US embassy in London. The reports states that al-Qaeda has plans to use "commercial aircraft" in "unconventional ways", "possibly as flying bombs." [Sunday Times, 6/9/02]

BRITAIN, WARNING #2: Al-Qaeda is the "final stages" of a very serious attack on a Western country

July 16, 2001: British spy agencies send a report to British Prime Minister Tony Blair and other top officials warning that al-Qaeda is in "the final stages" of preparing a terrorist attack in the West. The prediction is "based on intelligence gleaned not just from MI6 and GCHQ but also from US agencies, including the CIA and the National Security Agency," which cooperate with the British. "The contents of the July 16 warning would have been passed to the Americans, Whitehall sources confirmed." The report states there is "an acute awareness" that the attack is "a very serious threat." [London Times, 6/14/02] This information could be from or in addition to a warning based on surveillance of al-Qaeda prisoner Khalid al-Fawwaz (see August 21, 2001). [Fox News, 5/17/02]

BRITAIN, WARNING #3: An Al-Qaeda attack will involve multiple hijackings

Early August 2001: Britain gives the US another warning about an al-Qaeda attack. The previous British warning (see July 16, 2001) was vague as to method, but this warning specifies multiple airplane hijackings. This warning is included in Bush's briefing on August 6. [Sunday Herald, 5/19/02]

AFGHANISTAN

Al-Qaeda is planning an imminent "huge attack" inside the US that will kill thousands

An aide to the former Taleban foreign minister, Wakil Ahmad Muttawakil, has revealed that he was sent to warn American diplomats and the United Nations that Osama bin Laden was due to launch a huge attack on American soil.

news.bbc.co.uk...


Al-Qaeda released martyr videos for most of the 9/11 hijackers

The Al Jazeera satellite network shows an hour-long video about al-Qaeda containing footage given to it from al-Qaeda of some of the 9/11 hijackers, including a martyr video from hijacker Abdulaziz Alomari (see September 9, 2002 and September 9, 2002).

Al-Qaeda Reveals 9/11 Hijackers 1

Al-Qaeda Reveals 9/11 Hijackers 2










Intelligence reports flooding from a number of countries around the world also warned the United States that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda would be responsible for the 9/11 attack.

The claim that 9/11 was an inside job is a despicable fabrication.


They may have referred to him as the "mastermind" of 9/11 after the fact, but he was NEVER wanted for the crimes of 9/11. Not once. Even though there were years between the event and the alleged killing of him by the SEAL team.

You are free to re- post the same videos and arguments that you have previously posted for numerous pages (argumentum ad nauseam, anyone?), but it still does not change the fact that bin Laden was never wanted by the F.B.I. for any involvement in the events of 9/11, regardless of how he was referred to after his alleged demise.

The claim that bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 is a despicable fabrication.
edit on 14-10-2015 by Thejaybird because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 14 2015 @ 12:27 AM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

Buildings just dont collapse. Buildings are made to withstand jet impacts. If anything the top of the building would have fallen. Steel gurders plus the steel cables crisscrossing the walls for support would stop the buildings from collapse. Wtc 7 should not have been destroyed even from falling debris it may have been damaged but the ENTIRE BUILDING SHOULD NOT HAVE BROKEN UP AND FELL. SAME WITH THE TRADE CENTERS.



posted on Oct, 14 2015 @ 12:31 AM
link   

edit on 14-10-2015 by Thejaybird because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
55
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join