It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ChrisRT
That�s nice... Sell weapons to two people that want to blow each other up.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Just to clear things up except for the nukes there is no 'parity ' in the armed forces of India and Pakistan.
So there's no question of 'keeping them at one leel to avoid conflict'...
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Just to clear things up except for the nukes there is no 'parity ' in the armed forces of India and Pakistan. So there's no question of 'keeping them at one leel to avoid conflict'...
Originally posted by Dima
i don't know about them buying F-16's, stick with the miG-29's i mean the F-16 is a nice plane, it looks nice, i think that both the MiG-29 and the F-16 have the same potentials, and are equal aircraft, i can't figure out which one is better, the F-16 has better supersonic maneuverability and the MiG-29 has better subsonic maneuverability, the F-16 has better avionics, in radar, i don't know, the MiG-29 has greater speed, it can actually outrun an AIM-9, the MiG-29 has a slight lead in speed at sea level, and it also has a better climb rate, it also has a considerabley higher combat radius than the F-16, but the F-16 has a considerable lead in weapons load, about 1000 kg's, really,i don't know which one is better, but it is a good idea to get your most likely oppenent's aircraft to test against, thats why America has MiG-29's and a very few Su-27's