While working yesterday, I was listening to a local conservative station in Seattle, 770 AM. They call themselves the 'Conservative' station. I have
more or less cubby-holed them into the Republican Establishment genre.
Anyways, they had a guest speaker on extolling the virtues of the TPP . He basically rebutted the job loss issue by stating that the agreement would
open the doors in other countries for U.S. Corporations that were previously closed which would result in more jobs via those new marketplaces.
The other point he raised was the trade deficit. He pointed out that when the economy was booming in the 90's, our trade deficit was very high due to
more disposable income and demand for manufactured goods resulting from that 'booming' economy.
He further pointed out that addressing trade deficits with specific nations-he cited Mexico, then Brazil- thereby avoiding China- by pointing out that
fixing trade deficits with specific countries wouldn't fix the overall trade deficit!!
I'd point out the host didn't rebut or question any of this!
Without delving into each in the OP, there is 'some' truth to all of this. Yet the overview is completely ignored by this individual-I caught this
slightly after the start and missed the name and group he represented....sorry about that- and the fact is to gain these 'concessions' we, per force,
are giving concessions in return. Seeing we're starting this 'accord' already behind in the 'game' with no spoken/promoted long term advantage for the
U.S..
For individual Corporations, a resounding YES. For the U.S. collectively? Obviously NOT, else they'd be promoting that fact to support the pact.
The trade deficit comments are sheer spin, IMO.
In the day, Gov't had the role of over-site when it came to Corporations Anti-trust laws, etc. The regulations, per the right were deemed overly
restrictive, of which I did and do agree, those restrictions were eased, to say the least, and the economy did surge. Where the left's argument is
valid to an extent is at some point, be it incrementally or not, greed and criminality also 'surged' within the Corporate world as a result. Hard to
argue that it didn't.
(Where and when is not germane to this thread nor who is responsible...blah, blah, so please refer to the vast multitudes of thread addressing that
subject already.)
As the large gov't crowd has held sway for some time now- one would think that they would have changed, altered to some degree this imbalance and yes
the right's control of congress and impeded that effort, if in fact, an honest attempt was ever made knowing full well those lip-service efforts were
merely P.R. as there was no chance for success- and the result is even more Corporate control of our economy lead by Obama and company.
Yes the relationship between corporations and socialists have been around for a while now. They eventually 'moved in together' and now they are
getting 'married'....LOL
Guess what? We're not invited to the wedding....
edit on 10-10-2015 by nwtrucker because: (no reason given)
edit on 10-10-2015 by nwtrucker because: (no reason given)