It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

GOP Probe Into Planned Parenthood Funding Comes Up Empty

page: 2
20
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 09:41 AM
link   
This is not a surprise at all.


originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Read your own link "carefully". He stated he found nothing wrong with how they "spent" their money. They deflect from the issue as you do.



HELLO! Who's deflecting???

REVENUE = INCOME It's all there in the OP. Ignoring the word doesn't change anything.




posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

Yes, you made your point. You think that indirect quotes are somehow more important than direct quotes when it presents an argument to keep the silly idea alive that Planned Parenthood broke any laws financially.
edit on 9-10-2015 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 10:50 AM
link   
Looks like PP has good accountants afterall.



Along with a good "cash" system too.




posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert


Not surprised. The Right-Wing has built themselves a bad reputation for becoming outraged, investigating the outrage and then the committees find no wrongdoing.



More time and money wasted on these Right-Wing witch hunts. Is it no wonder the approval ratings of congress remains near an all-time low? Never mind taking care of issues that are affecting the majority of Americans. Our representatives just don't get it!



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 11:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Clearly 9-10 more investigations are in order al a Benghazi.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 11:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Looks like PP has good accountants afterall.



Along with a good "cash" system too.



Or the more logical conclusion is that there was nothing to these allegations in the first place and you and others were deliberately spreading propaganda to push your weaselly agenda.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:12 PM
link   
a reply to: WeRpeons

Here's what troubles me, everyone here will jump to wild baseless conclusions about the most asinine things... but we had hours upon hours of unedited footage of PP reps discussing the sale of infant body parts (which I watched, as I'm sure everyone here with an opinion did as well, right?), which is not only a crime but vile and disgusting. Try to set aside whether or not you support abortion, or whether you prefer donkeys to elephants. If such a claim was made wouldn't you WANT an investigation? That we live in a society where people look at this and say, "move along, nothing to see here," is disturbing.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Gothmog

Any weak thread to grasp to keep the lies going huh?

The PP reps weren't lying in the CMP videos.

That part is only too obvious. At least you aren't claiming they edited the videos anymore. That really weakened your argument.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic


HELLO! Who's deflecting???

REVENUE = INCOME It's all there in the OP. Ignoring the word doesn't change anything.


Did they review the videos?

Not_A_Word



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

Your point of trolling has clearly been made.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink, or in this case read the same damn lines you are quoting.

edit on thFri, 09 Oct 2015 12:41:03 -0500America/Chicago1020150380 by Sremmos80 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

What do the videos have to do with investigating their revenue?


edit on thFri, 09 Oct 2015 12:41:17 -0500America/Chicago1020151780 by Sremmos80 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Gothmog

Any weak thread to grasp to keep the lies going huh?

The PP reps weren't lying in the CMP videos.


Whoever said that the reps were lying? CMP told lies about what they were actually saying.


That part is only too obvious. At least you aren't claiming they edited the videos anymore. That really weakened your argument.


Oh that's still true. This thread just isn't about those videos being edited. Hence I'm not mentioning it. That would be offtopic.
edit on 9-10-2015 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: intrptr

What do the videos have to do with investigating their revenue?

Some investigation.

Don't go there, the evidence is overwhelming.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Clearly 9-10 more investigations are in order al a Benghazi.


Naturally. Republicans LOVE wasting money on frivolous and redundant investigations.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t


Oh that's still true. This thread just isn't about those videos being edited. Hence I'm not mentioning it. That would be off topic.

I starred you just for the masterful dodge.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 12:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
Don't go there, the evidence is overwhelming.


The evidence is overwhelming that this has been a HUGE witch hunt from day 1. Anyone who refuses to see that at this point is actively ignoring evidence to paint that narrative. The OP just further confirms that.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Bah, they investigated finances, not practices. The videos make that clear enough for those not in denial or covering it up.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 01:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Bah, they investigated finances, not practices. The videos make that clear enough for those not in denial or covering it up.


The videos accuse Planned Parenthood of profiting off of aborted tissue donations. Yet that was JUST shown to be untrue by this Congressional committee.



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 01:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Read your own link "carefully". He stated he found nothing wrong with how they "spent" their money. They deflect from the issue as you do.



Did you ever take a basic accounting course? revenue definition = "Fees earned from providing services"
www.accountingcoach.com...

edit on 9-10-2015 by UnBreakable because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2015 @ 01:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: neveroddoreven99
a reply to: WeRpeons

... but we had hours upon hours of unedited footage of PP reps discussing the sale of infant body parts (which I watched, as I'm sure everyone here with an opinion did as well, right?),


I did watch them, but they weren't unedited. And there's a difference between "selling" something, and receiving funds to COVER the cost of organ and tissue donation. Smearing those together, as if they were the same, is very disingenuous on the part of the anti-PP group.



which is not only a crime but vile and disgusting.


IF someone, ANYONE, were selling body parts, it would be vile and disgusting. But, as this and many other investigations have shown, no wrong-doing, legal or medically ethical, has been established.




top topics



 
20
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join