It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Four Russian Navy warships have fired a total of 26 missiles at the position of the terrorist group Islamic State in Syria, Russia’s Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu announced. The missiles were fired from the Caspian Sea.
“Four missile ships launched 26 cruise missiles at 11 targets. According to objective control data, all the targets were destroyed. No civilian objects sustained damage,” Shoigu said.
The missile attacks came from Russia’s fleet in the Caspian Sea, which borders Russia, Iran and three other littoral countries. The precision weapons reportedly hit all intended targets. The attacks apparently required cooperation from Iran and Iraq, as the missiles had to travel through their airspace to reach Syria.
Earlier, Russian warships played a key part in deploying the Russian warplanes to Syria, delivering equipment and supplies to an air base near Latakia and the Navy’s old base in Tartus.
So the question is: The US has been bombing IS targets for the past one year but why are they so pathetically ineffective?!
originally posted by: Gothmog
The question is , is it IS they are bombing or Syrian rebels against Assad...?
originally posted by: Gothmog
The question is , is it IS they are bombing or Syrian rebels against Assad...?
originally posted by: Gothmog
The question is , is it IS they are bombing or Syrian rebels against Assad...?
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Gothmog
The question is , is it IS they are bombing or Syrian rebels against Assad...?
Didn't they say if it looks, acts and runs like a terrorist, its a terrorist?
Only the US is forced to back peddle explaining who's who in the War on Assad--- I mean Terror.
originally posted by: PurpleDog UK
a reply to: Gothmog
That is exactly the question to ask....!!
PDUK