It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Iran: Missiles Pointed at US Targets

page: 1
25
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+1 more 
posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 07:51 PM
link   
Freebeacon

On all US bases in the Middle East...

Just to add insult to injury to Obama's weekend of "karma's a bitch", the Iranians pile on with this news. Ballistic missile development on down to new torpedoes...the whole gamet to challenge Obama's new line in the sand.

But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!

Only in Obama's and Kerry's puny mind!!!!!!


I am mobile so minimal OP today.



+6 more 
posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Granite

The IS infection should be over with in no time, in fact everybody seems weary of the US and allies next move, so I guess Iran is ensuring that it doesn't fall victim to another one of the devious western 'terrorists' programs.

And Iran has every right as a country to defend it's sovereignty especially from a police state that doesn't know how to mind it's own business..

edit on 6-10-2015 by InnerPeace2012 because: (no reason given)


+10 more 
posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Granite



But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!

No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:06 PM
link   
But, without Iran, you will have a completely Saudi dominated middle east - do you think that would be an improvement over the current (fubar'd) situation?


+4 more 
posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Granite

Meh, can't get worked up by a nation wanting to protect itself. Especially when surrounded by military bases of a destabilizing foreign power who have made a mess of the middle east.



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:08 PM
link   
It's only a matter of time til the smaller kids that have been bullied get together and fight back.



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: InnerPeace2012
a reply to: Granite

The IS infection should be over with in no time, in fact everybody seems weary of the US and allies next move, so I guess Iran is ensuring that it doesn't fall victim to another one of the devious western 'terrorists' programs.

And Iran has every right as a country to defend it's sovereignty especially from a police state that doesn't know how to mind it's own business..


Yes, it took three days to ruin fours years of CIA/NWO/TPTB/Obomber efforts.
What took Evil Empire so long?



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:10 PM
link   
We couldn't do # to Syria besides make a horrible mess. What on Earth makes us think we have any chance pulling a Lybia in Iran? .000000000000003% and that's being gracious.

Ghadaffi warned his fellow Arabs they could be next, or he could be next after Saddam. He nailed it. Sucks for him and his countrymen though doesn't it? Iran having seen history unfold, why wouldn't they point their armament at the threat?

Syria isn't Lybia and neither is Iran, period. To think otherwise is hubris as evidenced by the years and booty spent trying to topple Assad. Before you know it t-shirts will be made with Putin and Assad in the likeness of Che and Castro. My idea, my trademark!

edit on 6-10-2015 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Granite

originally posted by: InnerPeace2012
a reply to: Granite

The IS infection should be over with in no time, in fact everybody seems weary of the US and allies next move, so I guess Iran is ensuring that it doesn't fall victim to another one of the devious western 'terrorists' programs.

And Iran has every right as a country to defend it's sovereignty especially from a police state that doesn't know how to mind it's own business..


Yes, it took three days to ruin fours years of CIA/NWO/TPTB/Obomber efforts.
What took Evil Empire so long?


Exactly, because IS was never the problem, it was Assad all alone..



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Granite

Everyone is pointing weapons at everyone . Then those being pointed at have weapons to shoot down the weapons being pointed at them , then the original pointers have weapons to stop the weapons being pointed at the weapons that were pointed in the first place . So then ............



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite



But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!

No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.

Okay...we will probably get an Israeli attack soon to make "document" mute though.



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   
Double post.
edit on 6-10-2015 by Granite because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite



But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!

No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.

Okay...we will probably get an Israeli attack soon to make "document" mute though.



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite



But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!

No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.

And now , arm them with nuclear warheads which they will soon have enough funding for thanks to the good old US and Obama. Which they have been researching for years ,,,,





posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite



But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!

No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.

And now , arm them with nuclear warheads which they will soon have enough funding for thanks to the good old US and Obama. Which they have been researching for years ,,,,



You have been listing to Benny's propaganda too much Iran has no nuclear weapons program. So how can they place them on the missiles when they aren't making them?



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Granite

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite



But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!

No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.

Okay...we will probably get an Israeli attack soon to make "document" mute though.

As long as Israel minds their own business then they have nothing to worry about. Iran has always said if Israel strikes them then they will retaliate. So the war mongers running Israel just needs to shut up and leave Iran alone.



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Granite



But...but...the Nuke Deal was supposedly written to stop this development!!!

No it wasn't. The Nuke deal was to stop them from developing nuclear weapons they still have the right to make ballistic missiles.

And now , arm them with nuclear warheads which they will soon have enough funding for thanks to the good old US and Obama. Which they have been researching for years ,,,,



You have been listing to Benny's propaganda too much Iran has no nuclear weapons program. So how can they place them on the missiles when they aren't making them?


Benny ? I know no Benny. And what propaganda has this "Benny" been saying to me? Please elaborate on both.



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 08:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

ahh yes, the same nuclear weapons that Israel and friends have been scare mongering about for the last 20 years right??

1992: Israeli member of parliament Binyamin Netanyahu predicts that Iran was “3 to 5 years” from having a nuclear weapon.

1992: Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres predicts an Iranian nuclear warhead by 1999 to French TV.

1995: The New York Times quotes US and Israeli officials saying that Iran would have the bomb by 2000.

1998: Donald Rumsfeld tells Congress that Iran could have an intercontinental ballistic missile that could hit the US by 2003.

Netanyahu Worked Inside Nuclear Smuggling Ring

This time its true though right?? for sure its only 3-5 years this time, again .....



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 09:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: AmericanRealist
a reply to: Gothmog

ahh yes, the same nuclear weapons that Israel and friends have been scare mongering about for the last 20 years right??

1992: Israeli member of parliament Binyamin Netanyahu predicts that Iran was “3 to 5 years” from having a nuclear weapon.

1992: Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres predicts an Iranian nuclear warhead by 1999 to French TV.

1995: The New York Times quotes US and Israeli officials saying that Iran would have the bomb by 2000.

1998: Donald Rumsfeld tells Congress that Iran could have an intercontinental ballistic missile that could hit the US by 2003.

Netanyahu Worked Inside Nuclear Smuggling Ring

This time its true though right?? for sure its only 3-5 years this time, again .....


You do realize how long it takes to research , build the equipment , and produce , dont you ? Gosh , I would hope you would have known or learned before posting.




posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 09:08 PM
link   
Who. The. Hell. Cares?!?!?


Good on Iran. Never know when the US is going to bust open another can of kickass freedom. When, not if.



new topics

top topics



 
25
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join