It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: crazyewok
Obama cant.
I dont see how he can. Such a executive order would be illegal and the states could just ignore it am I correct?
He's done it 23 times already so he can.
According to the 14th amendment EVERY state can ignore EO's that abridge our civil liberties if they wanted to.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: crazyewok
Obama cant.
I dont see how he can. Such a executive order would be illegal and the states could just ignore it am I correct?
He's done it 23 times already so he can.
According to the 14th amendment EVERY state can ignore EO's that abridge our civil liberties if they wanted to.
Well he can make a EO but as you point out that EO means nothing and is a waste of ink if it contradicts the constitution.
originally posted by: n00bUK
To own a gun it should need a gun license that takes age, criminal record, financial background, mental health records. Registration to your council/local authority. Liability insurance on every gun owned. 14 day waiting period after purchase. Universal comprehensive background checks. No private transfer of firearms. Every sale or gift goes through a licensed firearms dealer along with registration change and liability insurance will be checked before transfer.
Police are more dangerous than the American public. Police should have their weapons taken off them and only given to a special force in the Police which deal with gun crimes.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: crazyewok
Obama cant.
I dont see how he can. Such a executive order would be illegal and the states could just ignore it am I correct?
He's done it 23 times already so he can.
According to the 14th amendment EVERY state can ignore EO's that abridge our civil liberties if they wanted to.
Well he can make a EO but as you point out that EO means nothing and is a waste of ink if it contradicts the constitution.
THAT RIGHT THERE? Is the proof of the left/right paradigm being pure BS!!
You being across the pond? You don't have the Constitution, yet explain how what you have happening in your country and the division is any different than the division in the US?
Find a difference other than the 2nd! Then think about why the 2nd is such a HUGE issue!
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: crazyewok
Obama cant.
I dont see how he can. Such a executive order would be illegal and the states could just ignore it am I correct?
He's done it 23 times already so he can.
According to the 14th amendment EVERY state can ignore EO's that abridge our civil liberties if they wanted to.
Well he can make a EO but as you point out that EO means nothing and is a waste of ink if it contradicts the constitution.
THAT RIGHT THERE? Is the proof of the left/right paradigm being pure BS!!
You being across the pond? You don't have the Constitution, yet explain how what you have happening in your country and the division is any different than the division in the US?
Find a difference other than the 2nd! Then think about why the 2nd is such a HUGE issue!
Well we have cerain rights. Though its through a bill not a constitution.
So I guess the nearest argument we have is the fight over our right to free speech.
Certain elements are trying to restrict so not to offend minoritys and we have huge fights and debates over it.
So in that way its a similar fight but diffrent issue.
Is that what you mean?
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: crazyewok
Obama cant.
I dont see how he can. Such a executive order would be illegal and the states could just ignore it am I correct?
He's done it 23 times already so he can.
According to the 14th amendment EVERY state can ignore EO's that abridge our civil liberties if they wanted to.
Well he can make a EO but as you point out that EO means nothing and is a waste of ink if it contradicts the constitution.
So I guess the nearest argument we have is the fight over our right to free speech.
originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: seeker1963
I might think gun culture is silly and alien.
But it does not change the fact it is a black and white right in your constitution.
And I know that if you chip away one right then nothing really stops those chiping away at other rights too.
It starts a slippery slope.
By that logic it to me seems best if you leave the bill of rights alone.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: crazyewok
I might think gun culture is silly and alien.
It's called the freedom culture.
And it is alien to some.
originally posted by: crazyewok
Obama cant.
I dont see how he can. Such a executive order would be illegal and the states could just ignore it am I correct?
O quit your bollocks.
But how would they confiscate the ILLEGALLY purchased guns?