Project Apollo Archive on Flickr

originally posted by: projectbane

originally posted by: wmd_2008
Hi ALL

9,000+ pictures from the Apollo Moon Missions are now on Flickr

Link Apollo Archive

Images are completely raw unprocessed scans at 1800 dpi from Hasselblad negatives- no adjustments have been made to them at all.

Have a look.

Here is a link to a full size image from flickr.

Full Size

Wmd

MOST of these pics are CGI or have been Photoshopped. Do not believe what NASA says.. BUT the pics of Earth from the moon are NOT real at all.

None of those pics are photoshopped.

None.

Photoshop and CGI dd not exist when they were taken and I have many many contemporary versions of the images in books, magazines and newspapers printed at the time of the missions.

The pictures of Earth from space are absolutely genuine and can be proven to be so because they match exactly what should be visible in terms of the angle of the Earth, the position of the terminator, the landmasses visible, and more importantly the date and time specific meteorological fingerprint of the clouds.

Photographs of the lunar surface show details of rocks and craters that were not known about before the missions but have subsequently been confirmed not just by US probes but by Japanese, Indian and Chinese ones.

If you have any evidence that they images were faked, provide it. Sitting there going "fake" is not adequate as proof.

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
It's worth pointing out to people that these images are completely raw unprocessed scans - no adjustments have been made to them at all.

They are absolutely superb!

And you know this as a fact because....?
Where you there? Have you been in custody/eyesight of these photos/negatives since they were taken, produced, and uploaded to the internet decades later?

I'm not saying they are edited or that there is anything to hide.
But come on..

a reply to: mortex

I'm not saying they are edited or that there is anything to hide.
But come on..

Well then...spit it out.
What are you saying?

originally posted by: mortex

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
It's worth pointing out to people that these images are completely raw unprocessed scans - no adjustments have been made to them at all.

They are absolutely superb!

And you know this as a fact because....?

Because I trust the source. Kipp Teague is not a NASA employee. He has specifically stated what he has done to the images. If he's done anything other than what he's claimed, he's a liar and a fraud. He is neither. Feel free to prove otherwise.

Where you there? Have you been in custody/eyesight of these photos/negatives since they were taken, produced, and uploaded to the internet decades later?

Were you? Have you looked at originals? Got hold of vintage copies?

As I already stated I have enough contemporary paper copies of my own to verify the images as correct, and I have spent a lot of time comparing what is in them to other information to prove they are correct. What have you done to show that they aren't?

I'm not saying they are edited or that there is anything to hide.
But come on..

Good, because they aren't and there isn't.

Wouldn't it be nice if one of these Apollo threads didn't devolve into "did not" "did so". Anyone with the smarts of an ant knows humans went to the moon, and honors that accomplishment. As I've said many times on ATS and elsewhere, everyone should try to talk to and/or meet one of the twelve men who walked on the moon, for this is the only time in human history that moon pioneers walk among us.

OP, thanks for a treasure trove of interesting and informative data.

originally posted by: projectbane


MOST of these pics are CGI or have been Photoshopped. Do not believe what NASA says.. BUT the pics of Earth from the moon are NOT real at all.

Oh boy, I'm full of anticipation for your proofs of how NASA was capable of CGI/photoshop in the late 60's and early 70's. Will you go with the standard "they have technology we can only dream about" or "Tech stolen from Roswell aliens" Place your bets, folks!

How do these new versions of the images compare to the ones at the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal? Those are also very high-quality, but if I'm not mistaken they were colour-balanced, because some of the photographic film has a colour cast due to differences in emulsion and processing. www.hq.nasa.gov...

P.S. In fact, the Flickr versions also seem to be colour-balanced (to eliminate the colour cast). I compared their version of images from the Apollo 17 magazine 134/B with the set of thumbnail scans provided at ALSJ, and you can see that the latter has the purple colour cast, while the formed doesn't.

cool thanks OP


I have a Nice Collection of 16MM ( High Quality )
Apollo Mission Footage. from 8 to 17
uncut uncencored , raw live , although some of the Footage
from the Reels from the video is overlapped or Written over. and
differnt various Speeds. some even upside down
or backwards.. LOL strange but true..

all came from a Japnese Site .. that was only up only a few days
before it was shut down. for the Obvious Reasons..
well as its Rumored that all of NASA and the American Goverment
Docs, Videos, Audios, are Stored in Japan
for Safe Keeping AKA the 2nd Orignal Copies.

truthfully i though the Moon Mission was not
what it was supose to be

thats until i seen the 16MM Flim clips from a half and Hour
to an Hour Long High Quality ( 640 x 480 ) Flim 4x6
and about 300+ Megs long to 600+ megs long ..

These Stills are from those Footages Ive Posted long ago on ATS









Not sure IF you would find similar photos like these Video Stills
in that Archive the OP placed on this thread..

I doubt it but maybe ..

i.imgur.com...

have u guys had the same idea? some fun with camera raw... =)

(mine on the left)

originally posted by: egidio88
i.imgur.com...

have u guys had the same idea? some fun with camera raw... =)

(mine on the left)

Hey try my photos of you could , im curious
its right above your post

it came from video to flim reel to AVI Format
from Japan.

I think they are from the Apollo 11 Mission before the Luna Landing.

as the last two are claimed to be the Apollo 11 Luna Lander Drop making the crater
and the fumes from the crash as i was told . IDK ..

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88
i.imgur.com...

have u guys had the same idea? some fun with camera raw... =)

(mine on the left)

Hey try my photos of you could , im curious
its right above your post

it came from video to flim reel to AVI Format
from Japan.

I think they are from the Apollo 11 Mission before the Luna Landing.

as the last two are claimed to be the Apollo 11 Luna Lander Drop making the crater
and the fumes from the crash as i was told . IDK ..

okay =) but first, www.flickr.com... ZOOM INTO THE CRATER. WHAT'S THAT? LOL

SEEN HERE TOO IN FEW MORE PICS OF THE SAME CRATER: www.flickr.com...

originally posted by: egidio88

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88
i.imgur.com...

have u guys had the same idea? some fun with camera raw... =)

(mine on the left)

Hey try my photos of you could , im curious
its right above your post

it came from video to flim reel to AVI Format
from Japan.

I think they are from the Apollo 11 Mission before the Luna Landing.

as the last two are claimed to be the Apollo 11 Luna Lander Drop making the crater
and the fumes from the crash as i was told . IDK ..

okay =) but first, www.flickr.com... ZOOM INTO THE CRATER. WHAT'S THAT? LOL

hmm ahhhh eeehhh

Lunar lander ? and the dust fumes ?

but the Legs are supose to Be still at the landing site..

well that if this suppose lunar lander is unside down.

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88
i.imgur.com...

have u guys had the same idea? some fun with camera raw... =)

(mine on the left)

Hey try my photos of you could , im curious
its right above your post

it came from video to flim reel to AVI Format
from Japan.

I think they are from the Apollo 11 Mission before the Luna Landing.

as the last two are claimed to be the Apollo 11 Luna Lander Drop making the crater
and the fumes from the crash as i was told . IDK ..

okay =) but first, www.flickr.com... ZOOM INTO THE CRATER. WHAT'S THAT? LOL

hmm ahhhh eeehhh

Lunar lander ? and the dust fumes ?

but the Legs are supose to Be still at the landing site..

well that if this suppose lunar lander is unside down.

Well you didn't mention the most importan thing, IT SHOULDN'T BE INSIDE THE FREAKING CRATER, hahahahahahahah... (if it's the lander...which i doubt.)

originally posted by: egidio88

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88
i.imgur.com...

have u guys had the same idea? some fun with camera raw... =)

(mine on the left)

Hey try my photos of you could , im curious
its right above your post

it came from video to flim reel to AVI Format
from Japan.

I think they are from the Apollo 11 Mission before the Luna Landing.

as the last two are claimed to be the Apollo 11 Luna Lander Drop making the crater
and the fumes from the crash as i was told . IDK ..

okay =) but first, www.flickr.com... ZOOM INTO THE CRATER. WHAT'S THAT? LOL

hmm ahhhh eeehhh

Lunar lander ? and the dust fumes ?

but the Legs are supose to Be still at the landing site..

well that if this suppose lunar lander is unside down.
from Apollo 12 Magazine 47/V

Well you didn't mention the most importan thing, IT SHOULDN'T BE INSIDE THE FREAKING CRATER, hahahahahahahah... (if it's the lander...which i doubt.)

let's compare .. that supposed lander crater again



or its something else .

or that the camera that was left at the site took the shot of the crater that the lunar was originally near
and had it dropped at the same exact location .. IDK it something

well looking for clues .. or could it be just some left equipment .. or something completely different..


I know for sure that the Still i made of the fuming crater was showing the crater was a smoke geyser in the video.

originally posted by: egidio88
okay =) but first, www.flickr.com... ZOOM INTO THE CRATER. WHAT'S THAT? LOL

SEEN HERE TOO IN FEW MORE PICS OF THE SAME CRATER: www.flickr.com...

It is, in fact, a spacecraft from another world - but I think you knew that already.

For those of you who don't know, It's Surveyor 3, an unmanned probe that landed a couple of years before Apollo. Apollo 11 landed nearly 3 miles off-target. One of Apollo 12's mission objectives was to prove that pin-point landings were possible, so the crater Surveyor 3 landed in was the designated target. Commander Pete Conrad landed Intrepid on the rim of the crater, just 200 meters from the probe.

Overhead view from LROC

During the landing and first EVA, most of the crater was still in shadow. The next day the sun had risen high enough for Conrad and his sidekick Al Bean to visit Surveyor. The photos they took are on magazine 48 .

They cut pieces off the probe and returned them to Earth to study the effects of long-term exposure to the lunar environment. Those pieces are now on display at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum.

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88
i.imgur.com...

have u guys had the same idea? some fun with camera raw... =)

(mine on the left)

Hey try my photos of you could , im curious
its right above your post

it came from video to flim reel to AVI Format
from Japan.

I think they are from the Apollo 11 Mission before the Luna Landing.

as the last two are claimed to be the Apollo 11 Luna Lander Drop making the crater
and the fumes from the crash as i was told . IDK ..

okay =) but first, www.flickr.com... ZOOM INTO THE CRATER. WHAT'S THAT? LOL

hmm ahhhh eeehhh

Lunar lander ? and the dust fumes ?

but the Legs are supose to Be still at the landing site..

well that if this suppose lunar lander is unside down.

Before people like you JUMP to comclusions maybe just maybe you should read up on the missions first

a reply to: Saint Exupery






Thanks for clearing this up, EXPUERY

At first I thought it was Surveyor
but the crater looked to deep.. at first
even though it was Apollo 12 flim
and something about the timing wating for the light to pass in..

well as NASA said the LM of Apollo 11 is Unknown where
it crashed when dropped


Im surpised that NASA didnt show this to the public !
as it basicaly colored

originally posted by: wmd_2008

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88

originally posted by: Wolfenz

originally posted by: egidio88
i.imgur.com...

have u guys had the same idea? some fun with camera raw... =)

(mine on the left)

Hey try my photos of you could , im curious
its right above your post

it came from video to flim reel to AVI Format
from Japan.

I think they are from the Apollo 11 Mission before the Luna Landing.

as the last two are claimed to be the Apollo 11 Luna Lander Drop making the crater
and the fumes from the crash as i was told . IDK ..

okay =) but first, www.flickr.com... ZOOM INTO THE CRATER. WHAT'S THAT? LOL

hmm ahhhh eeehhh

Lunar lander ? and the dust fumes ?

but the Legs are supose to Be still at the landing site..

well that if this suppose lunar lander is unside down.

Before people like you JUMP to comclusions maybe just maybe you should read up on the missions first

I know Quite Well thank you ..

1) its dark, hardly noticable

2) looks like a Deep Crater with a Dark Shadow cast

3) It was never shown to the Public before ( right ) this

Project Apollo Archive
AS12-47-6968

Apollo 12 Hasselblad image from film magazine 47/V - EVA-1


4) I knew of the Location of Survayer 3

5) I failed to Scroll Down further to see AS12 and Not AS11 as i was Discussing Apollo 11

6) of the Suposed Lunar 11 Crash Still I captured from a 16mm flim video
why is NASA claiming its Unknown where the Crash site is of the Lunar Lander ?

Lunar Module "Eagle"
Jettisoned from the Command Module on 21 July 1969 at 23:41 UT (7:41 PM EDT)
Impact site unknown
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...

yet...

a reply to: Wolfenz

That Apollo 12 image has been available for many years, eg

www.lpi.usra.edu...

You will also find that the position of the sun's shadow in the crater is entirely consistent with the time it was taken, and photographs taken later show the crater fully lit - see my analysis here:

onebigmonkey.com...

Apollo 11's ascent module was sent into lunar orbit after separating from the CSM, but gravitational anomalies called Mascons caused it to crash into the surface - its location is not known. If you are raising a question about that, it is better to post a source for your image and say why you are questioning it.

e2a: You can also find that surveyor crater photograph as part of panorama 9 on page 122 of the Apollo 12 Preliminary Science Report, which was freely available at the time.

www.hq.nasa.gov...

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
a reply to: Wolfenz

That Apollo 12 image has been available for many years, eg

www.lpi.usra.edu...

You will also find that the position of the sun's shadow in the crater is entirely consistent with the time it was taken, and photographs taken later show the crater fully lit - see my analysis here:

onebigmonkey.com...

Apollo 11's ascent module was sent into lunar orbit after separating from the CSM, but gravitational anomalies called Mascons caused it to crash into the surface - its location is not known. If you are raising a question about that, it is better to post a source for your image and say why you are questioning it.

e2a: You can also find that surveyor crater photograph as part of panorama 9 on page 122 of the Apollo 12 Preliminary Science Report, which was freely available at the time.

www.hq.nasa.gov...

Thanks : One Big Monkey

I see you did some homework on your site.

I havent seen that photo before and then again i wasnt looking for it ethier.

Apollo 11's ascent module was sent into lunar orbit after separating from the CSM, but gravitational anomalies called Mascons caused it to crash into the surface - its location is not known. If you are raising a question about that, it is better to post a source for your image and say why you are questioning it.

Ok

So NASA Says its Unknown.

the Photo Still I Captured is Claimed to be a Apollo Lunar landerr
crash. a well known ATS Member Either Phage , or Jim Orberg
himself has said what it was , My first thought it was Gas or Steam
coming out from the Moon, but It was from a 16 MM Apollo 11 Film Reel.

well seeing you have some incite Knowledge of the Apollo Missions

which Apparently Im Lacking alot.. but getting there..

What does these two Photos Represent !

1) a gas plume ? in a crater
2) Apollo 11 Lunar Lander crash site ? and if it is
would NASA be Able to pin point the location just from
the Surrounding crater's of the crash ?
WHAT IS IT ?




Captured Using GOM Player
From a Apollo 11 16MM Film Converted to AVI
Came from A Japanese individual in Japan
found out about it 7 years ago from a Ufo Forum site

Site only lasted like 1 or 2 days then it was 404 ! aka : Shut Down ..


The AVI

Apollo 11 according to the Film Test Pattern Plate at the beginning

size 640 x 480 4x6 High Quality close to HD , very clear ! original film had
noticeable wear in some spots . NO SOUND . and the Speed was all messed up
in some spots too . and the Moon Video Shots were various Speeds
and seem like in some spots over lapped or Re dubbed reused ..like Layers Video
something like what News Stations DID in their Live on the Scene Recorded Videos.
the film is done, Amature ( home Movie Style ) like it Should be. It has all 3 Astronauts
in it some goofing off. entertaining themselves. along the Journey to the moon
and back again.

To bad I couldn't place it here on ATS ( if I knew how ) its about an Hour Long .
not sure of the Policy or High Water I would be in..or they would be in..

So if youycould identify these photos ive posted

I Appreciate it .. thanks.


The Original Tile of the AVI's , I dont know it was All Japanese originally
the only this that was identifiable able was 16mm A11

I had to place my own title.


Phage... JIM O..... HELP.... Please.

Old Wolfy Calling.