It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The ets have nothing to do with crop formations except the fact that ufos and the orb as seen at them and we can't recreate the formations aspects lol.
Were not putting rare radioactive isotopes in formation soil, were not altering every plant inside of a formation, were not causing the radiation inside the formations, were not burying massive magnets to throw off compasses inside of formations, were not causing fields that kill power inside formations, were not responsible for the spheres of light or ufo sightings, were not responsible for the massive several hundred foot formations that appear within a half hour when pilots are on their way back and it's there
were not responsible for the massive several hundred foot formations that appear within a half hour when pilots are on their way back and it's there
Feel free to mention anything when I again say were not putting rare radioactive isotopes in formation soil, were not altering every plant inside of a formation, were not causing the radiation inside the formations, were not burying massive magnets to throw off compasses inside of formations, were not causing fields that kill power inside formations, were not responsible for the spheres of light or ufo sightings
From scientists with the Italian Committee for the Investigation of Claims of the
Paranormal:
"Three papers published by W. C. Levengood (1994), W. C. Levengood and N. P. Talbott (1999) and by
E. H. Haselhoff (2001) suggested the involvement of some kind of electromagnetic radiation during the
creation of crop circles. Here we discuss the methods and conclusions of the three
articles, pointing out the misrepresentation of the experimental protocols, the misleading application of
statistical procedures, the arbitrary discarding of unwanted results and the weakness of the proposed
physical model to the suggested hypothesis".
www.colinandrews.net...
were not putting rare radioactive isotopes in formation soil, were not altering every plant inside of a formation, were not causing the radiation inside the formations, were not burying massive magnets to throw off compasses inside of formations, were not causing fields that kill power inside formations, were not responsible for the spheres of light or ufo sightings
Wow, you looked for a link that agreed with your idea that isn't fact based
We conclude that the claims about the involvement of some kind of
electromagnetic radiation in the creation of crop circles are not supported by the
available evidence. In particular, the 1/r2 symmetry exists only as a consequence
of the unjustified exclusion of unwanted data; even in this favourable condition,
the suggested model does not fit the data as well as a simple ‘‘best fit’’ straight
line. Even if a 1/r2 trend were found, it should not, anyway, be related to a point
source radiating the exposed crop field, because this implies a complete
transparency of the plants to the striking radiation, so avoiding the absorption of
energy. Moreover, the BOL model was selectively applied only to circular
imprints, while all other geometric crop formations with rectangular or more
complex patterns were deliberately ignored because they cannot fit the BOL
hypothesis.
www.cicap.org...
originally posted by: Telepathy3
a reply to: Chadwickus
I just said ten times that it doesn't matter if he is or not cause real formations have things we can't recreate
Doesn't explain the ufo or orb sightings, the failure of electrical equipment inside formations over decades time, the compasses malfunction inside only the formations, the statement you quoted is some guy talking about nothing but his opinion. He doesn't even address anything