It's hard to argue against the fact we live in a THEOPHOBIC culture.

originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: TzarChasm

I disagree with the premise. Psychosis is a human condition, not restricted to any one belief system whatsoever.

the same can be said for theism.

By belief system includes religion as well as the rest, socialism, capitalism, nationalism, to name but a few....

all of which are subject to the filters of psychosis, should psychosis be present. but I am not interested in splitting hairs here. I would rather be theophobic than homophobic or negrophobic. religion is a choice, sexuality and skin color are not.

a reply to: TzarChasm

I'd agree with two of the three. Sexuality? Bull.

Psycho-babble...

originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: TzarChasm

I'd agree with two of the three. Sexuality? Bull.

Psycho-babble...

I take it you don't actually have a rebuttal.

anyway, there are worse things to be than theophobic.

a reply to: TzarChasm

You raised it. I responded.

It is off topic and won't have the thread shifted based on a, frankly, boring challenge. Nice try, though....

Yes, I agree there are worse things than theophobia. Thanks for the acknowledgment of it's existence.

originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: TzarChasm

You raised it. I responded.

It is off topic and won't have the thread shifted based on a, frankly, boring challenge. Nice try, though....

Yes, I agree there are worse things than theophobia. Thanks for the acknowledgment of it's existence.

well, it would be ridiculous to suggest that theology is immune to phobia. so of course one should acknowledge the existence of theophobia, although one should also take care not to vilify it out of hand.

my "boring" challenge eh? the one you failed to refute?

pretending to have the upper hand doesnt give you the upper hand. im not here to compete though, so no need to feel defensive.

a reply to: TzarChasm

Your right. It would be ridiculous.

I have neither the upper hand nor the lower. I have, however, stepped in doo doo before and have learned how to avoid repeating the process.

Not pretense. Merely, thanks but no thanks....

originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: TzarChasm

Your right. It would be ridiculous.

I have neither the upper hand nor the lower. I have, however, stepped in doo doo before and have learned how to avoid repeating the process.

Not pretense. Merely, thanks but no thanks....

either you want a discussion or you dont.

its sounding more like the latter at this point.

a reply to: TzarChasm

Not biting. The thread is the thread. I made my views known. You have yours.

Start a thread of your own if your so inclined. Take care.

originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: TzarChasm

Not biting. The thread is the thread. I made my views known. You have yours.

Start a thread of your own if your so inclined. Take care.

raising the white flag, eh?

in your position, i would too.

a reply to: TzarChasm

It merely holds no interest.

It you like, you can win...