It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Republicans Have The Only Viable Candidates for 2016

page: 7
20
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 2 2015 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: NihilistSanta

Those are Hitlers words before he was in power. Abolishing private property and collective control aren't Socialist (worker ownership of the means of production) but Statist. They are not at all the same thing. In Statism, the government owns the means of production.
edit on 10/2/2015 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 2 2015 @ 05:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

Who cares when he said them that doesn't mean anything. So who enforces worker "ownership" if not the state? This is going way OT and I sense you know you are wrong but I'm sure you will flail away regardless.



posted on Oct, 2 2015 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: NihilistSanta

Your contention is that it doesn't matter when he said them? Really? Nazism's success was due to powerful propaganda. So it matters greatly when he said any given thing but more so it matters what he did once in power so I ask again where was the Socialism in Nazi Germany?

Not that it will make sense to you but... law would enforce worker ownership, the same as it does for capitalism. Socialism is an economic model, that is all it is... it's not an ideology nor a form of governance. So, much like our current laws support raising and maintaining capital, in Socialism laws would support labor.



posted on Oct, 2 2015 @ 05:20 PM
link   
people need to vote the republicans out of congress, and yet nobody talks about that here......apparently they have done everything right....let's see how soon till they shut down the government....only ten more weeks for that just passed "continuing resolution" to end, and then the can really destroy the government like all the anarchists and anti-Americans here on ATS have hoped for.



posted on Oct, 2 2015 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

So you assume that everything he said was a lie because he employed propaganda? If that is the case I can claim he wasnt anti-semetic ( I dont believe this FWIW) but was merely using propaganda.



posted on Oct, 2 2015 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: NihilistSanta

He may not have actually been anti-Semitic, creating an enemy was essential. If it hadn't been the Jews it could have been anyone.



posted on Oct, 4 2015 @ 02:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: seeker1963

This is a hoot! I am having a blast playing with you polarized believers!


I think you're mistaken....to everyone else here you seem to be trying ridiculously hard to bait someone, but it seems that you've only ended up gleefully playing with yourself.


edit on 4-10-2015 by Argus100 because: Typo



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join