It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Cecile Richards admits that 86% of Planned Parenthood’s (non-government revenue) is from abortions

page: 2
35
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:45 PM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

That wasn't what this was about though, this thread is clearly about this 86% revenue number which is what I was addressing.




posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:45 PM
link   
Oh boy it's math time boys and girls.

Ok so value A (Planned Parenthood's Revenue) found here Planned parenthood Revenue $184.7 million

Value B (cost of abortion) found here cost of abortion in the US about $470.00

Now we just learned Value C the 86% revenue from the linked topics above.

Using what we have (A - 86%) /C = 55,017.02



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Xuechnen has not watched it apparently, but yes she did say that.



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
Xuechnen has not watched it apparently, but yes she did say that.


I will be honest, I have not been following the testimony with any deep interest, how does this affect the perception?

I always thought that Planned Parenthood (from a viewpoint of someone who never went to one) was kind of a 'one stop shop' for women's health services. Is her admitting that they do not do mammograms an issue or not?



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:50 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

For me personally I don't think so.

I am sure we are going to see that talk track, but would not offering one service out weigh what they do offer?



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:52 PM
link   
She's dodging questions from Palmer about income, her compensation, PAC funding, donations, etc.

Every time her answer was, I don't know.



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: xuenchen

Go to the 50 min mark and watch it.


What was aid at the "50 min mark" ?

I'm not on a unit that can view videos or live streams at the moment.




posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

What does that have to do with the topic at hand and the revenue from abortions?



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
I am sure we are going to see that talk track, but would not offering one service out weigh what they do offer?


I think the only way it would is if they specifically mentioned that in any context related to the videos that were released over the summer.



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

I had the hearings on the background and I could have sworn she said none of the locations had mammogram machines.

That's because none of their clinics are licensed to perform mammograms.



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:57 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Of course you are not, so you found a source with people tweeting about it and made a thread.

That totally makes sense.

edit on thTue, 29 Sep 2015 13:58:52 -0500America/Chicago920155280 by Sremmos80 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Like how?

Did I miss something about the mammograms?



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: xuenchen

Of course you are not, so you found a source with people tweeting about it and made a thread.

That totally makes sense.


Something damning must have been said under oath I suspect from the reactions so far.




posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bone75

That's because none of their clinics are licensed to perform mammograms.


Then it makes total sense that they have no mammogram machines.



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80

Like how?

Did I miss something about the mammograms?


I have no idea, that is why I asked. I wanted to know if mammograms or the machines used for them was somehow germane to the hearings.



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I already told you what was said, people are just going off your title and it is rather clear.

Just because other people are responding to the ignorance of posting without knowing doesn't make it true.


+2 more 
posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 02:02 PM
link   
If 7/8 of their revenue is made from abortions they really need to change their name to unplanned parenthood.
Maybe they should have greater focus on prevention education. I would much rather pay for condoms.



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

So 3% of their business covers 86% of their funds? So that $500,000,000 that they get from the feds is only 14% of what they take in? That means they make around 3 billion in abortions..



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Ok then we are on the same page lol.

Kinda wondering where the focus on the mammograms is coming from as well.



posted on Sep, 29 2015 @ 02:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
Kinda wondering where the focus on the mammograms is coming from as well.


From the question I overheard. I was wondering what the relevance was to the hearings.

Sounds like it was a red herring.



new topics

top topics



 
35
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join