It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'd run far and fast. "they" will be after you soon.
originally posted by: TombEscaper
Here is the question: Why, or how, is it only now that these things have entered into the mass consciousness? For example, if the skeptics are correct (those who insist that millions simply misread or are “misremembering” the name of the Bears), why was this mistake never an issue throughout the decades of existence of the Berenst_in Bears? Why is there not an overwhelming amount of documented historical evidence showing that there has been a long running “name dilemma” throughout the storied existence of the BB’s? If this is nothing more than a case of mistakenly reading the name, why is it that the masses of people who are so insistent of a “Berenstein” rendering had never been corrected or realized their mistake throughout all the decades?
originally posted by: continuousThunder
having been following this whole thing for a couple of months now, the part that fascinates me most is how difficult it seems to be for so many people to grasp... like for real, people, stop bringing up the physical evidence, we're not talking about the physical evidence, we all know it all says stAin, kindly keep your oh so witty quips about government facilitated book changing teams for your stand up routine where i'm sure you get the reception you so richly deserve.
The question this thread poses is so damn on-point - why have we all only suddenly realised? we've had global communication for a long time, most of us have been here on this very website throwing strange ideas around for many years... how did something so ubiquitous take so long to get recognised?
originally posted by: NihilistSanta
I am still working my way through the thread so sorry if this has already been mentioned. I was wondering why is the assumption from the stein camp immediately involve some alternate reality/dimension? To me an explanation that would be plausible and fits the main points raised is that it is the result of some type of mass mind control experiment. This explains a lack of any physical proof of "stein" books in existence. This explains why only some people are affected by the phenomenon. This also could explain why the delay in mass "realization".
Imagine if you will as an experiment done to affect or alter memories on a mass scale through something akin to subliminal triggers. The programming was embedded in some form of media only certain people were exposed to. Sometime around 2005 those people are exposed to a trigger.
This is all hyperbole btw but it seems my suggestion is more plausible as a conspiracy theory than something that alters the fabric of reality haha.
originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
Thank you for reminding everyone! It seems that skeptics of this subject love to jump onto points or arguments which are to varying extents off-topic to the OP. The whole point of this thread is to ask how skeptics of this subject can overlook the fact that it is only now, recently, that we are all discovering that "The Berenstein Bears" never existed.
Even if they believe it was always -"stain," still, there are logical questions here to consider: A. How only now, and not all these years before? B. How could so many people mistake "-stein" for "-stain" in the first place? Who goes up to someone with the last name "Bain" and says: "Excuse me, Sir, do you pronounce B-A-I-N 'Bain' or 'Bein?'"
We remember it so strongly because a lot of us learned to read and pronounce partially due to these books, or/and through reading and pronouncing them to their children. For many of us, our memories are vivid and without question. But to stay on point with this topic, how could so many of us remember the same specific changes and why only recently? What kind of sense does that make? (And yes, you can counter it by saying how absurd it sounds to you, but many skeptics have already voiced this. The point of this thread is to ask you, the skeptics, how do you overlook this aspect of the phenomenon?)
originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: network dude
I'd run far and fast. "they" will be after you soon.
Proof of your limited thinking.
How are you so sure I am not part of "they" already, hmmm?
originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
a reply to: Milah
I too remember Charles SchulTz. I read it many Sunday mornings and watched many of the cartoons as a child. I identified with Charlie Brown as a boy, as did a friend of mine (although he was more like Dennis the Menace lol) At one point I watched a documentary on Charles Schultz's life, and my father had a book on him. There was always a 'T.'
Not sure if this was the docu, but listen to how they pronounce his name:
originally posted by: Doc Lithium
The Google Trends data is interesting and even somewhat conclusive supporting the possible timeline merge.
originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
I too remember Charles SchulTz. I read it many Sunday mornings and watched many of the cartoons as a child. I identified with Charlie Brown as a boy, as did a friend of mine (although he was more like Dennis the Menace lol) At one point I watched a documentary on Charles Schultz's life, and my father had a book on him. There was always a 'T.'
Not sure if this was the docu, but listen to how they pronounce his name: