It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: PublicOpinion
The US has been bluffing for a year about MH17. Their bluff has been called, and they cannot prove their claims.
Explain why the Russian Ministry of Defence muddied the waters with the ridiculous Su-25 claims and the claims of diverted flight path?
I have seen aircraft damaged from gunfire, and the damage to MH17 looks very much like it.
The Dutch are never going to admit that because they are trying to reinforce the NATO story of Russian BUK.
On the contrary, I fully expected they would regurgitate the NATO story. I predicted that outcome a few weeks ago here at ATS.
I don't need the Russians to tell me how to think
Maybe I'm wrong, but judging from the coverup by NATO, I'm probably right.
Here you can see a photo of the same area on July 17. Draw your attention that the antiaircraft system is absent on this photo.
Of course the Russians muddied the waters
Who on Ceres cares about a broken TELAR? Blaim Hollywood maybe? Again:
And where exactly did you add any proof to your claim, that the Russians lied?
Are we still talking Bellingcat-games?
See following for original Russian MOD presented satellite image and the Digital Globe match ups to prove that the Russian MOD lied. And you say that they never muddied the waters?
Russia didn't fake anything yet, at least not that I'm aware of.