It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: M5xaz
Like I said "you don't care about facts".
FYI you can't be in a pause and also consistently have the hottest years on record at the same time.
Read about it or don't. Your claim doesn't change the facts.
10-warmest-years-globally
"The global temperature was 1.24°F above the long-term average, besting the previous record holders by 0.07°F. "
I love it when they post numbers around an average but never tell us what the margin of error and/or deviation are. Especially when they are so low. 0.07, seriously?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: M5xaz
Like I said "you don't care about facts".
FYI you can't be in a pause and also consistently have the hottest years on record at the same time.
Read about it or don't. Your claim doesn't change the facts.
10-warmest-years-globally
"The global temperature was 1.24°F above the long-term average, besting the previous record holders by 0.07°F. "
I love it when they post numbers around an average but never tell us what the margin of error and/or deviation are. Especially when they are so low. 0.07, seriously?
I am sure if you look into it you could find the answer.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: M5xaz
Like I said "you don't care about facts".
FYI you can't be in a pause and also consistently have the hottest years on record at the same time.
Read about it or don't. Your claim doesn't change the facts.
10-warmest-years-globally
"The global temperature was 1.24°F above the long-term average, besting the previous record holders by 0.07°F. "
I love it when they post numbers around an average but never tell us what the margin of error and/or deviation are. Especially when they are so low. 0.07, seriously?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Helious
I don't know if you are playing at poe or actually believe what you are saying, but what I have said is in line with the scientific consensus so if you plan on debunking scientific consensus you have a long road ahead of you and I wish you luck.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Teikiatsu
What do you expect. WUWT reprinted the article and changed the headline for whatever reason.
If all the fossil fuels were burned at one time like in their hypothetical it may be possible to have those effects.
UAF model used to estimate Antarctic ice sheet melting
originally posted by: Helious
a reply to: Grimpachi
You are wrong on every point. There is no scientific evidence that shows that humans are effecting climate change. None. In simple point of fact, the Earth experiences climate changes from moderate to drastic and science is still at a loss to explain those, before mankind, during and certainly now.
Don't be disingenuous in your arguments because we both know as does anyone informed that reads our posts that what I am saying is the truth. If you care to refute this, which I already know you can't, post me some links so I can quickly discredit them.
Incorrect scientists have been saying we will be seeing massive floods, famine, relocating refugees from the coasts world-wide for decades now.... as far back as the 70's.
They point out the glaciers that are receding but ignore the glaciers that are growing.
They point at mountaintops and omit that the snow is disappearing due to dry are, not because of the heat.
They ignore that the southern hemisphere is colder than the northern.
Their graphs pick starting points that ignore cold points the preceed the graph.
They try to erase the Medieval Warming and the Little Ice Age.
They estimate data
I have no respect for anyone that defers to scientific consensus. I have sat in meetings with PhDs who share the same degrees. They do not reach consensus. They argue their own pet theories and seek to find error in other's. It is a beautiful things to watch.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Teikiatsu
What do you expect. WUWT reprinted the article and changed the headline for whatever reason.
If all the fossil fuels were burned at one time like in their hypothetical it may be possible to have those effects.
UAF model used to estimate Antarctic ice sheet melting
That would be impressive to see, all at once. Such a pity that won't happen. So this is just fear mongering?
Here is some scientific evidence for you.
originally posted by: NewzNose
a reply to: Grimpachi
Google "global cooling in the 70s" and research. Much more than just a "few" papers. I lived it and recall all the hype quite clearly.
You know what's heating the Earth? The sun.
That and all the secrecy going on under our feet.
originally posted by: boncho
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: M5xaz
Despite the fact that all "climate models" have failed.
All of them.
Hey Holmes, you are wrong. Not that you care about facts.
No climate models predicted the current 18 year and counting pause
No climate model is able to predict when it will end.
Failure, utter failure.
Those ARE the facts
You have NONE
Facts have sources. You don't.
originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: charlyv
Here is some scientific evidence for you.
Nice graph. Cherry picking data yet again. Why not get the real one!
Now, argue with that graph. CO2 emissions have always followed increasing temps and this makes a lot of sense. The warmer it gets, the more plants can grow, more plants = more animals = more CO2 in the atmosphere.
Understand this, we have way insufficient complex data to understand anything. Our records for temperature can only go back to the invention of the thermometer and the early ones were not all that accurate.
The climate debate is about two things.
Ripping money from mums and dads to go into the pockets of the elite.
Too hide the real truth and that graph should send a big chill down everyone's spine. We are due for another ice age, like it or not it is coming and there is nothing we can do about it.
This 10,000 year period we are near the end of has been one of the best on record. Mankind has flourished.
So, how long have we got ... well ... there is insufficient data to work that one out!
It could be a thousand years from now, it could be within the current generation's life time.
P