Full Interview: Kim Davis Talks To Megyn Kelly About Gay Marriage Licenses

originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: dawnstar
what do you mean by getting married?

Do you mean being in a contract to get benefits? That is a civil union

Well, NO!

Got it right here. Marriage, clearly printed on my government license.

You can believe whatever you want. Its just not factual.

a reply to: Annee

factual by whos definition?

if anything went against the silly beliefs of a group of militants out to try to make ceaser god then they would just change the definition and call the change "evolution of society"

a reply to: deadeyedick

Why do you keep calling us Militants?

a reply to: Darth_Prime

I was beaten by a lesbian logger.

To me it is militant to go out of ones way to cause trouble.

Everybody has options now but that is not good enough for militants.

a reply to: deadeyedick

So Kim is a Militant? people that Show up to Pride Events with signs that say God Hates F*** are Militants? people that deny Woman's rights are Militants?

i sense a common theme here

originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: Darth_Prime

I was beaten by a lesbian logger.

To me it is militant to go out of ones way to cause trouble.

Everybody has options now but that is not good enough for militants.

Did you or did you not go out of your way to make this thread?

Were you expecting no trouble?

What does God say about hypocrites?

a reply to: Darth_Prime
no kim is not militant but the two standing across the counter screaming at her are militants

yes some sign holders are militant when they go beyond the norm into extreme like wbc

why not just own the fight against Christian views?

originally posted by: DeadFoot

originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: Darth_Prime

I was beaten by a lesbian logger.

To me it is militant to go out of ones way to cause trouble.

Everybody has options now but that is not good enough for militants.

Did you or did you not go out of your way to make this thread?

Were you expecting no trouble?

What does God say about hypocrites?

I have no problem with hypocrites

yes the definition I used was vague and this thread is about as militant as I can get over the interwebs

a reply to: deadeyedick

Wait, What...by your definition

To me it is militant to go out of ones way to cause trouble.

And Kim is not doing that?

originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: Darth_Prime

I was beaten by a lesbian logger.

Do you have context to cite or is everyone who does anything to you that you don't like just always wrong, automatically a militant who attacks poor-little-you, with their 'head in the sand'.

Most of us realize at a young age that our own actions are what cause repeated problems in our lives.

But I guess it's everyone else's fault all the time for some people.

Come on, she is the definition of a militant. The people on the other side of the counter were simply trying to exercise thier equal right to a government service. Kim is trying to wage a one woman Christian jihad against the 'evil' gays who only want to get married.

originally posted by: deadeyedick
a reply to: Darth_Prime
no kim is not militant but the two standing across the counter screaming at her are militants

yes some sign holders are militant when they go beyond the norm into extreme like wbc

why not just own the fight against Christian views?

Of course not, that would be a double standard and the religious right would never do that :p

originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: deadeyedick

Wait, What...by your definition

To me it is militant to go out of ones way to cause trouble.

And Kim is not doing that?

originally posted by: deadeyedick

I have no problem with hypocrites

Ah, so the only important parts of scripture are the ones that don't address your lifestyle as a negative.

I understand you now.

Must be a fun life trying to aim stones with that log in your eye.

See you in hell.

a reply to: deadeyedick

Common-law marriage, also known as sui juris marriage, informal marriage, or marriage by habit and repute, is a legal framework in a limited number of jurisdictions where a couple is legally considered married, without that couple having formally registered their relation as a civil or religious marriage. The original concept of a "common-law marriage" is a marriage that is considered valid by both partners, but has not been formally recorded with a state or religious registry, or celebrated in a formal religious service. In effect, the act of the couple representing themselves to others as being married, and organizing their relation as if they were married, acts as the evidence that they are married.

en.wikipedia.org...

like I said my marriage certificate has the word MARRIAGE in it. Both the state that issued it and the state I live in recognize it as a marriage. My MARRIAGE has lasted throughout my adult life and well, it was till death do we part while probably about 50% of those marriages that would fit your definition won't last half as long! It was a marriage in the truest sense of the word, and no, gov't benefits and such really didn't play much in the decision to do it, nor did pregnancy. and, quite frankly your bigoted views is no justificaton to degrade that marriage into anything less than it was.

a reply to: Megatronus



It's just the Liberal Progressive Gay Agenda taking away Religious Freedom

a reply to: Darth_Prime

ya, it's not like they are trying to take the rights of any heterosexual couples out there who are trying to skimp and save some money and therefore taking the cheapest path to MARRIAGE they can find, or those who wish not to partake in religious ceremonies the right to marry now is it???

originally posted by: DeadFoot

originally posted by: deadeyedick

I have no problem with hypocrites

Ah, so the only important parts of scripture are the ones that don't address your lifestyle as a negative.

I understand you now.

Must be a fun life trying to aim stones with that log in your eye.

See you in hell.

We are all sinners therefore all hypocrites

what stones do you refer to here?

a reply to: dawnstar

I don't think anyone is taking Heterosexual rights away? unless i'm missing something in your post?

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Darth_Prime

ya, it's not like they are trying to take the rights of any heterosexual couples out there who are trying to skimp and save some money and therefore taking the cheapest path to MARRIAGE they can find, or those who wish not to partake in religious ceremonies the right to marry now is it???

Again the government can not invoke any spiritual involvement into a marriage.

Commo0n law marriage without a ceremony is nothing more that a civil union

a reply to: deadeyedick

So does everyone who disagrees with you have an agenda? what about your own agenda? I bet more sinister then Krazys lol.