It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AMPTAH
originally posted by: Barcs
I don't think humans should look at animals at all to determine acceptable human behavior. Why would you look to a less intelligent species to see what to do? It's like asking a 5 year old for dating advice.
Right. We look at less intelligent species to determine what NOT to do.
We don't want to be like them. Just because its natural for them, it doesn't mean it should be natural for us.
We have to rise above our animal nature.
We have to understand what the genetic apparatus is for, what it does, and how it should be used.
Animals don't know any better.
They don't study medicine, and biology, and physiology, etc..
Animals don't care.
If it feels good, it's an animal right.
But, humans are different.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
Oh brother. I'll just let others more qualified answer your questions. If you are actually interested then just do some research. It's simple really. Besides few proofs have already been posted in this thread. Many proofs elsewhere.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
If there were no straight people, you would never have been born.
A silly argument. Even if 100% of the population is homosexual, they would still reproduce.
There are around 10-15% people who are homosexuals which makes it normal. Some have argued that homosexuality is nature's way of controlling population growth (yes some research have shown that).
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: pompel9
I have looked at all the supposed "proofs" of homosexuality in nature, and I haven't seen any actual proofs.
Clearly you have not.
This is basic biology. To make a baby, you need a man and a woman. A woman and a woman can not make a baby. A man and a man can not make a baby. If you have some evidence to the contrary, then please post it.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
This is basic biology. To make a baby, you need a man and a woman. A woman and a woman can not make a baby. A man and a man can not make a baby. If you have some evidence to the contrary, then please post it.
HEEEELLLLLLOOO?????
Many gay men have married and had children before they came out years later.
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: pompel9
Yes. Yes they would. Gay people are not hell-bent on the extinction of our species. If in this hypothetical situation there were only gay people they would either 'take one for the team' or even more likely they would use artificial insemination and surrogate mothers. Gay people make babies. That's a fact.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
To use your words. The are not gay, but bisexuals.
Keep moving the goalpost.
I'll let Lucid Lunacy reply to you.
Have a good night.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
I never brought up bisexuality. You did.
Apparently you have never masturbated before.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Vroomfondel
Either way, why cant some people be hard wired with an additional switch that lets them choose what they want when they want?
If we can accept the idea that people can be hard wired in two different configurations, why not three?
No one is saying that they can't choose. The third one you mentioned is what is called bisexuality.
[edit] By choosing I mean you can't choose to be who you are attracted to. You can choose the BEHAVIOR not the ATTRACTION.
If at Heaven's gate we find out I was right, so be it. And if we find out I was wrong, so be it.
And if we find out that nobody was right or wrong?
originally posted by: AMPTAH
We don't want to be like them. Just because its natural for them, it doesn't mean it should be natural for us.
We have to rise above our animal nature.
Animals don't know any better.
originally posted by: pompel9
originally posted by: TheLamb
Why is that at straight bars and pubs fights always break out yet at gay places there's never a murmur? Football is predominantly straight yet it's marred with violent, racist drunks. ISIS is straight. The Nazis were straight. Why do so many gays go into the caring professions and become eminently qualified and respected doctors and nurses? Why are homosexuals so much more into raising money for charity? If being gay is a choice then it would seem to me to be the better one than being straight from a historical and sociological point of view. Why be straight?
If there were no straight people, you would never have been born.
So I am evil, because I am straight? And you wonder why there are many people that do not like homosexuals.
Masturbation does not make babies.
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: pompel9
The context wasn't stone-aged people. You said if everyone was gay then there would be no baby-making. That's beyond absurd. There is zero chance gay people would willingly allow our species to end via a complete cessation of reproduction. You're also apparently unaware that gay people reproduce all the time via the aforementioned methods.
None of this talk is of any real consequence. There is not going to be any shortage of heterosexuals making babies. There is going to continue to be heterosexual people, and gay people, and new babies being brought into the World. In fact, the global population is projected to increase dramatically. Gay people are not holding that back. According to UN projections and US Census Bureau the world population may rise to 16 billion by 2100: