It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Best Description Of The Reptilians You've Ever Seen

page: 6
3
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 02:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by defrag99
I have intuited this. He's an Alien in human skin; affable; seemingly reasonable; plays a decent game of golf. But he is more focused on process (and profitability) than he is on outcome (or Justice) because his sense of justice will be satisfied when humanity is extinct.

He's an officer of a defense contractor whom everybody likes and respects because they don't think about the consequences of his "brilliant ideas."



Much like ... the "corporate psychopath" then ?
edition.cnn.com...




posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 02:40 PM
link   
but no one has given any kind of evidence of anything at all. The pics? Fake.
The theory itself?
Fantasy/ Speculation....

These forums should be used to examine credible occurrances of the unexplained IMO.

This is just as credible as the guy who believes in Santa!




posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 02:46 PM
link   
I try to take the "what if" approach when jumping into threads as this. I have serious doubt about all this Reptoid stuff, but I'm willing to go along for the ride at times. I know belief is a powerful thing and I'm not here to pee on a persons own beliefs, but come on! Isn't a bit too convenient that these reptoids can look like anybody they choose and that the live under our feet and we have no real knowledge of them or their domination agenda?



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 02:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Der Kapitan
I try to take the "what if" approach when jumping into threads as this. I have serious doubt about all this Reptoid stuff, but I'm willing to go along for the ride at times. I know belief is a powerful thing and I'm not here to pee on a persons own beliefs, but come on! Isn't a bit too convenient that these reptoids can look like anybody they choose and that the live under our feet and we have no real knowledge of them or their domination agenda?


Bingo!!! We have a winner!



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 02:54 PM
link   
And Kompaktor thought we were ALL loonies.



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Der Kapitan
And Kompaktor thought we were ALL loonies.


Nothing wrong with loonies. A pocket full of these and you can party all night.





Sorry, couldn't stop myself.



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Der Kapitan
And Kompaktor thought we were ALL loonies.


I like Kompaktor's posts. We're all interested, or else we wouldn't be here.
His attitude is kinda like mine....if it sounds like nonsense and you have
NO PROOF...well.....



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 03:14 PM
link   


I must say, I do see a resemblance to John Kerry in this particular reptilian specimen.




posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 03:17 PM
link   



See I thought THIS was Kerry. Dang shape-shifters!



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 03:38 PM
link   
goes back to Sun Tzu in 400 B.C.

The ethic of War was a highly developed strategy that had definite limits and boundaries as to, who got hurt.

Exopolitics.org's literature would indicate that other sentient races have less and greater ethical boundaries--different ones--than humans have historically had.

I'm reading Sun Tzu's, "The Art of War," torture is not a topic that is even brought up in the text or the index.

It says, "the supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting," and "He did not conceive war in terms of slaughter and destruction; to take all intact, or as nearly intact as possible, was the proper objective of strategy."

Is this strategy now obsolete?

Not all wars during Earth's history have been prosecuted like Attila the Hun, World War II and the Vietnam war--without regard to the sanctity of civilian populations.

I submit, our History of war is so different from what is now being conducted as war, that some form of outside intervention can be inferred.

Go ahead and make fun of the word, "Reptoids," and show funny pictures of people who look odd.

That won't stop the current philosophy of War as plunder, pillage, rape and destruction.

What happened? When did Ethics go down the toilet?

Ah hah. 1947, officially. Up to that point, Truth was the standard and guideline by which all official USGovernment documents were authored.



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 03:45 PM
link   
You'll need to go back further than '47. It was common for the U.S. Cavalry to attack and wipe out Native American settlements while the warriors were away. George Washington set in motion a pattern of genocidal attacks against Amerind peoples of the Northeast. Gengis Khan was said to have killed everything in his path save for one induvidual to tell the tale of Khan's ruthlessness. Vlad Tepis' exploits are legendary now. And not to mention the long history of attrocities commited by the Japanese against the Chinese and vice-versa. I think the concept of a noble war was only thought of by a few, and really not practiced widely.

[edit on 2-1-2005 by Der Kapitan]



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 04:01 PM
link   
Der Kapitan said: You'll need to go back further than '47. It was common for the U.S. Cavalry to attack and wipe out Native American settlements while the warriors were away. George Washington set in motion a pattern of genocidal attacks against Amerind peoples of the Northeast. Gengis Khan was said to have killed everything in his path save for one induvidual to tell the tale of Khan's ruthlessness. Vlad Tepis' exploits are legendary now. And not to mention the long history of attrocities commited by the Japanese against the Chinese and vice-versa. I think the concept of a noble war was only thought of by a few, and really not practiced widely.

Ghengis Khan was an astute administrator.

www.allempires.com... , QUOTE--

At his death, the Mongol Empire stretched from the Yellow Sea to the Caspian Sea. No other empire in history has seen such an extraordinary expansion in the lifetime of one man. Although Chingis Khan brought much destruction in his conquests, it is clear that he did not intend to commit mass genocide like that of Hitler, even though the death tolls far exceeded anything in history. Chingiss dream was conquest, and whenever surrender was seen, bloodshed was avoided. He was exceptionally respectful to those who supported him, and it was not uncommon for him to befriend defected enemies.

Vlad Tepes was just another serial killer like Dahmer, who ate about 100 people in the US in the 90s.

So that leaves the genocidal policies of Founding Fathers against Amerinds [my own ancestors] and the carnage of World Wars I and II.

My my, we are definitely retrogressing, aren't we?

As Sun Tsu says, "There has never been a protracted war from which a country has benefited."

Today's is no exception. And who exactly is behind today's wars is not clear. It appears to be war for the sake of destruction. Not even Iraqi oil is sufficient an argument to promote bankruptcy of the whole United States, to prosecute it.

Someone is BEHIND the ransacking of this nation; and that person cannot be a human or have any human feelings, connections or ideals.

That somebody has got to be an Alien in human clothing, role and person, well funded and staffed.

And it's not the President. Never was.


Odd

posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 04:03 PM
link   
why have they "got" to be anything? I can name any number of arseholes, and all of them are human.



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 04:15 PM
link   
The Great Khan was an astute leader, yes. But as to warfare- He was brutal and ruthless in his approach to combat. I would dicount Vlad as just a serial killer. He did defend his country from the onslaught of the Turks. Not a bunch of slackers there.

Something may be behind all of this, yes. I find the simplest answer the easiest to swallow: Power corrupts, humans are capable of great good and evil without the manipulation from an outside source.





[edit on 2-1-2005 by Der Kapitan]



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 04:24 PM
link   
You have hit the nail square on the head. Bingo!

edition.cnn.com...

Only, I think there's one guy leading the pack, who's got access to everybody's HR files--everybody's.

Remember "Sneakers" the movie.

Yeah, like that.



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 04:30 PM
link   
We seem to be on the same page, but in different books, per se. I looked at the article and where you ultimately see Reptoid machinations I see human weakness and greed.

[edit on 2-1-2005 by Der Kapitan]



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 04:50 PM
link   
Not exactly.

I see non-human intervention.

If you read down Salla's list of intervening and non-intervening Alien races, take your pick which one or ones are responsible for our Leaders initiating genocidal and omnicidal policies, without respect to the welfare of their constituencies.

Is it the Reptoids or the Tall Greys or the Small Greys or whoever?

How the hell would I know?

But I suspect it's someone [due to the monolithic nature of the problem] that is indistinguishable from a real human.

I mean, I don't see any industrialists dissenting from the pack; nor any legislators; nor any judges; nor any Federal employees.

It's as if every single human on the Federal payroll has bought in to killing us all OFF.

They follow somebody's line of thought, slavishly, from the top to the bottom of the pyramid. There is zero dissent from the Federal quarter.

Somebody's got one boatload of PURE POWER over all those civil servants.

Some ONE. My guess.

Nobody else appears to even be making any guesses, eh?


Odd

posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 05:03 PM
link   
but why must it be alien influence?

Human beings are more than capable of evil and corruption. We've all seen this in action several times... we are not, whatever idealism might lead one to believe, altruistic creatures.



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 05:21 PM
link   


but why must it be alien influence?


That's what I'm sayin'.....Why?



posted on Jan, 2 2005 @ 06:00 PM
link   
Why?

Because there is a historic and factual decision made by the Feds to LIE and DECEIVE the American people--a policy decision--that was made in 1947 and has been followed every since--

relating to extra-terrestrials and relationships with extra-terrestrials.

Officially, they don't exist. Therefore, they can anonymously do whatever they can manage to do, and there is absolutely NO ACCOUNTABILITY--

not legal, not moral, not ethical, not legislative, not consensual--

zero.

Because we the people have ZERO KNOWLEDGE of what the hidden peoples comprise, what they want, what they have, what their rights are, they operate with impunity . . . as none of the rest of us do.

It's the thread of official Federal lies that leads us straight back to the visitors or crash victims at Roswell New Mexico.

It's the thread of lies and deceit about Treaties that our Presidents Truman and Eisenhower signed--the Greata Treaty--that leads us straight back to that source of INTENTION.

Aliens have no reason to wish us well. Look what we did to them.

Read Salla's accounts. Read MKUltra. Read the Jehovah Project.

The covert ops described above are just as barbaric as our present war. The stories coming out of underground bunkers where they breed hybrids and do experiments on the subjects would make most people blanche.

You think our Visitors will not want to "get even"? or at least, "stop the abuse"?

You have a better idea--where omnicidal and genocidal policies are coming from?



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join