Originally posted by marg6043
For those who are not familiar with this story from the bible, it started with the very first couple to walk the earth.
God created Adam and Eve, "in his own image" declared that what He had made "Was very Good" then got so enraged with them that He cursed the
entire human race with an uncortrollable fury that continues to this very day.
Unable to resolve the dilemma of homo sapiens using the free will that He had given them, God in exasperation came down to earth and had Himself
nailed to a cross to appease his own wrath.
And even this action did not change humanity.
Now how childish does this story sounds like? this is what church and the bible has being preaching to us all our life.
We have gotten more educated and smarted than that.
ROTFL! Now this has go to be the best and most clarified accounting of Christianity. Well
done! If I may piggyback on this post to address the topic:
I am just getting around to reading this thread after I posted on this topic to another which was started by Amuk. His question is one we will never
know the answer to until such time there is a reckoning, and it asked simply about about life after death.
Now imagine thousands of years ago we have the man with intelligence but with not much tapped intelligence, and they ask; from where did we come? why
do we die? In the world they know they hunt for an explanation, as man being man, we have philosophers even back then, so they reach as far into the
depth of their imaginations that they can and being believers in a God or Gods, a tale starts to spin and thus the one that lasted in a particular
sect of people receives the most attention.
Now it was a very simple explanation, with the first two people being tempted by a serpent and eating a piece of fruit which probably sounded
acceptable at the time. But with time, as the intelligence is tapped, and man progresses, the questions get a bit tougher, and the story is expounded
upon, let's say philosophically, with each step and age. You can actually see this at play in Amuk's thread, none of us know the answer, but we have
each reasoned through to the best of our logic and come to a conclusion, differing based on the stories we have bought into.
It is not difficult then, to take an established set of beliefs and from there, quote it, and expound on it even more and have others accept the newer
version as an update on fact.
The issue of original sin holds no water, it was in fact a very hot topic among church fathers beginning well after Jesus' death, and it is from
their interpretations that Christians adopt the theory of original sin, a sin as far as I can see is caught up in circular (il)logic.