It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What came first, Nothing or Something?

page: 17
20
<< 14  15  16    18  19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 11 2015 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem?

So here's to the perennial quest for resolution. Cheers!


edit on 09 11 2015 by MaxTamesSiva because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 11 2015 @ 05:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: MaxTamesSiva
a reply to: vethumanbeing
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem?

So here's to the perennial quest for resolution. Cheers!

Just do not get Escher or Bach involved.



posted on Oct, 12 2015 @ 05:32 AM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing
How about Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle?

Maybe death will give us the answer or at least we will all be a part of the answer, if we equate death with nothingness and life with something? Just a random speculation, maybe I'll just read Hofstadter book? I give up, for now.



posted on Oct, 12 2015 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: MaxTamesSiva
a reply to: vethumanbeing
How about Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle?

Maybe death will give us the answer or at least we will all be a part of the answer, if we equate death with nothingness and life with something? Just a random speculation, maybe I'll just read Hofstadter book? I give up, for now.


It most certainly will; as you will find out if you completed your contract as you desired initially upon incarnation; good thoughts (read Hofstadter for fun).



posted on Oct, 12 2015 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

When something separated from nothing it was the birth of time.



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 07:53 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Are you guilty ; )



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: cryptic0void
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Are you guilty ; )

I had nothing to do with the outcome of the Cards vs Cubbies Game today: NO; (that ball that hit the ivy direct did not stick in the vines should have been a triple).
edit on 13-10-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 09:09 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Then guilty, denial is the tell ; )



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 09:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: cryptic0void
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Then guilty, denial is the tell ; )

Back to your initial premise "to be naïve is a good thing" (based upon what ideology) as guilt and denial for the true 'naïve' is not a thing considered AT ALL (no comprehension).
edit on 13-10-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 09:27 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Naiveness, like evasiveness, and perhaps passiveness hurts the brain less and hearkens unto a state of innocence.
Either Melville or something I just made up.



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: cryptic0void
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Naiveness, like evasiveness, and perhaps passiveness hurts the brain less and hearkens unto a state of innocence.
Either Melville or something I just made up.

Naivete (have been accused of often being) is everything compared to evolving an evasiveness or true word "Cunning" as is the custard base it profligates to outsmart or outthink another. This is a word idea forum/for fun. I like Melville; Conrad and Edgar Allen Poe, you know the others.



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 09:47 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

David Lindsay



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 09:49 PM
link   
a reply to: MaxTamesSiva

What's the proof?



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 09:53 PM
link   
a reply to: MaxTamesSiva

Is death a philosophy of thought?
I would say I thought naught of the thought I aught.
edit on 13-10-2015 by cryptic0void because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 09:56 PM
link   
a reply to: cryptic0void
(david lindsay) No idea who this is and I am not doing your homework.


edit on 13-10-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 09:59 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Your work is not at home, it roams.
edit on 13-10-2015 by cryptic0void because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 10:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: cryptic0void
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Your work is not at home, it roams.

The roaming WORK is dangerous as is not "HOME" based (odd; I have no idea where *home* is: makes this thing I call grafting/surfing an unknown very frightening potential) but still familiar/safe enough. This is getting into the existential realm of idea forms.
edit on 13-10-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2015 @ 10:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: cryptic0void
a reply to: MaxTamesSiva

Is death a philosophy of thought?
I would say I thought naught of the thought I aught.

Only if one thought ones physical death aught have brought the cessation of all thought; (killed eternal idealization forever in its being-ness).
I DONT THINK SO.
edit on 13-10-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 14 2015 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

Reactive personality formations are entertaining, from the level of reactive personality formations. Self reflexive reflectivity. I thought so! And Lo! So IT was! or wuzn't wizend wozent

edit on 14-10-2015 by cryptic0void because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 14 2015 @ 10:40 AM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

We left them?



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 14  15  16    18  19 >>

log in

join