a reply to:
micpsi
Tis good that you brought up
Parabrahman which was what I had in mind when I approximated Awareness with "Father" to simplify
things a little. Parabrahman is the proper word though a simpler word like
Homeground or
The Source is
friendlier to the layperson. However, Parabrahman lies
outside the field of time, being
T I M E L E S S in nature.
Yes, it is
prior to consciousness but this view obtains only from the Consciousness perspective (i.e. a
bottom-up,
and not
top-down, view). Awareness begets Consciousness (Father begets the son as the Christians would have it), Consciousness
being inseparable from Matter and both co-exist in virtue of Awareness. For Consciousness-Matter to come into being, time and space have to both come
into being as well; for them to co-exist, they have to be extended in time and space. Although epithets like eternity, infinitude, world-without-end,
etc are ascribed and applied to Consciousness, these words denote and involve TIME fundamentally, which means that Consciousness-Matter are relative,
not absolute, in nature. It's impossible for Consciousness (or Satchitananda) to become, or transform into, Parabrahman, that is, to shift or evolve
from the Relative to the Absolute, except... well, let me leave you to work out the exception bit on your own!! Parabrahman is always untouched,
pristine, peerless, for it can never be defiled by time... yes, it is veritably
T i m e l e s s n e s s Itself, and in no
way can eternity, infinitude be ascribed to, or compared with, it. The latter is only a second best, though, more often than not, it has been
unwittingly treated and regarded as the be-all and end-all of Sadhana when in truth, it is really not so.
edit on Octpm15 11 20 by Rextiberius because: editing
edit on Octpm15 11 20 by Rextiberius because:
amendments
edit on Octpm15 11 20 by Rextiberius because: further amendments
edit on Octpm15 11 20 by Rextiberius
because: (no reason given)
edit on Octpm15 11 20 by Rextiberius because: (no reason given)
edit on Octpm15 11 20 by
Rextiberius because: corrections
edit on Octpm15 11 20 by Rextiberius because: (no reason given)