I personally think consciousness came first. We know for sure that consciousness is true: we are it. I Am, and so are you. There are other prominent
philosophers and scientists who agree:
"The All is Mind; The Universe is Mental." -The Kybalion.
"All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system
of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind." -Max Planck
This is why "The Word" of the Conscious God was able to create:
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made;
without him nothing was made that has been made." (John 1:1-3)
edit on 20-9-2015 by cooperton because: (no reason given)
Evolution would say that matter came first, then as homo sapiens developed they developed consciousness. God is made in men's minds. When your
dreaming, are you conscious of dreaming? Besides that there is no universal consciousness. If that were so we would all see the same thing, but we
"In the beginning the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" God's Holy Divine Consciousness was the beginning.
"All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made." Afterwards all things were made.
God is a soul as well as spirit and at some point in time (that is for us) he also took on a Body. Because we cannot understand or measure "from
everlasting" and "to everlasting" we cannot understand how one lives in a condition that is past, present and future all at once as God does.
So we ask questions like, which came first.
edit on 20-9-2015 by ChesterJohn because: (no reason given)
Neither. They've both always existed in my opinion. Matter requires consciousness to be formed and consciousness requires matter to have experience.
We as temporary beings seem to think that everything must have a beginning or end but that's not how it is when looking at the bigger picture in my
opinion. Having a beginning or end implies a first and last, there is no such thing within infinity or eternity.
Energy has been evolving for 14 billion years. The collection of matter on Earth has been evolving for 4 billion years.
Since I can dream and have 'experiences' without actually interacting with the matter I am dreaming about, I am going to lean toward consciousness
coming first -- because it may not be dependent on matter.
Is there such thing as consciousness outside of a body though? A brain or similar structure is required for consciousness to arise as far as we can
tell. It's a never ending or beginning process. The physical never had a beginning just as consciousness didn't in my opinion.
a reply to: cooperton
I agree with your first sentence here
I personally think consciousness came first.
However I am not so sure that your next sentence is true
We know for sure that consciousness is true: we are it.
Studies over the last couple of decades into the workings of the human mind and the nature of what we like to call human consciousness are indicating
that much of what we have traditionally considered consciousness is really nothing more than learned behavior and unconscious repetition with little
to no free will involved.
You also suggest that
There are other prominent philosophers and scientists who agree:
While at the same time the prominent philosophers and scientists who disagree are also lined up in a long line.
For me Cooperton, the question is a, if not THE, paramount question of human existence and I do not believe that it can be dismissed by a simple "it's
simple". For me the nature of consciousness in general and specifically 'human' consciousness can only be understood by approaching it's nebulousness
from both directions. And in juxtaposing both thoughts we might not only come to understand it better but also manage to become more 'fully'
in the beginning, there was nothing. out of this nothing, came everything.
out of this nothing mind, matter, consciousness emerged.
one day the universe will cease to exist, and everything in it. some people call this the big crunch of the universe.
This is much like life and death how in nothing exists before you were born, and nothing exists after you die.
one could argue that we are like God in that we created ourself, as in the process of forming a human embryo is in the golden ratio and it is said
that first god had to create the three dimensions.
Some people say that conciousness is the substance of the universe, and if true it would be as if we were a "thought"; and Thought create thoughts,
much like the reproductive act. if the egg of your mother is yourself, and so is the sperm of your father, when they create an embryo that turns into
a fetus(both the embryo is created in the golden ratio with the seed and flower of life as well as the human body when formed is in the golden
They say sacred geometry holds the key to the manifestation of all matter, and this video may help explain to you how the chicken came before the
really, you may be a figment of your own imagination.
edit on 20-9-2015 by Belcastro because: (no reason given)
Neither. Matter and consciousness are the most ill-defined terms in the english language, and in this sense, meaningless. To assert the primacy of
either is assumptive at best, completely false at worst.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.