It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: rockintitz
a reply to: Profusion
You, yourself, will succumb to this theory.
Everyone will.
My logic is better than your logic and your logic is better than my logic.
Unless...
originally posted by: Profusion
originally posted by: rockintitz
a reply to: Profusion
You, yourself, will succumb to this theory.
Everyone will.
My logic is better than your logic and your logic is better than my logic.
Unless...
The fact that you're calling what I presented in the original post a "theory" reveals to me that you have no idea what you're talking about. It's not a theory, it's a mathematical fact. You're also implying that what I presented in the original post is "logic" when it's not logic, it's pure mathematics.
As for the rest of what you wrote, pure assumptions. Nice use of irony.
originally posted by: rockintitz
originally posted by: Profusion
originally posted by: rockintitz
a reply to: Profusion
You, yourself, will succumb to this theory.
Everyone will.
My logic is better than your logic and your logic is better than my logic.
Unless...
The fact that you're calling what I presented in the original post a "theory" reveals to me that you have no idea what you're talking about. It's not a theory, it's a mathematical fact. You're also implying that what I presented in the original post is "logic" when it's not logic, it's pure mathematics.
As for the rest of what you wrote, pure assumptions. Nice use of irony.
Fact?
Is it peer reviewed? Post it.
I'll be sure to quote this post when you reply in any way emotionally to anything.
originally posted by: rockintitz
a reply to: Profusion
Forget about peer review
Forget about your verifications of the verifications of your claims.
So you must be right. And it stops with you.. Right?
Forget about peer review, if you could find one professional statistician and/or expert in statistics in human history that disagreed with the theory I presented in the original post, I would be stunned.
You'll never find one, I'll guarantee it. If you do, I'll leave this forum forever.
originally posted by: JetBlackStare
It's rare that one goes on such a convincing rant without even giving the inspiration for it.
Did your significant other accuse you of cheating? Do you actually beleive Hillary about her emails? Not convinced of aliens?
What is it?
originally posted by: soulpowertothendegree
a reply to: Profusion
Well my mother had a different approach...she hated the word assume, because she said all it did was make an ass out of u and me.
originally posted by: soulpowertothendegree
a reply to: Profusion
Well my mother had a different approach...she hated the word assume, because she said all it did was make an ass out of u and me.
The next time you're watching a video or reading a theory where about ten assumptions are stated as facts before a conclusion is made (which requires all or most of the assumptions to be true), just move on. You're way out there in woo woo land right from the start.